Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
SOXX and FTEC solve different portfolio problems. SOXX is a focused bet on semiconductor companies, while FTEC spreads assets across the wider U.S. information-technology sector. Choose SOXX when you intentionally want chip-industry exposure and can tolerate larger cyclical swings. Choose FTEC when you want a broader technology allocation, a much lower published expense ratio, and lower issuer-reported volatility. Neither fund is a complete stock-market portfolio, and FTEC’s larger holding count does not eliminate mega-cap concentration: its three largest reported positions represented 44.74% of assets on September 30, 2026. The right choice depends on the role the ETF must play, not on which had better recent performance; both issuers warn that past performance does not guarantee future results.
What are SOXX and FTEC designed to own?
SOXX is a semiconductor-sector ETF. Its prospectus says the iShares Semiconductor ETF seeks to track an index composed of U.S.-listed equities in the semiconductor sector. FTEC is a broad U.S. information-technology ETF: Fidelity says it seeks to track, before fees and expenses, generally the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index and invests at least 80% of assets in securities included in the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index.
![[Brandon Turner]-The Book on Rental Property Investing- How to Create Wealth and Passive Income Through Intelligent Buy & Hold Real Estate Investing! (SoftCover)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51mMR6cQZCL._SL160_.jpg)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
That difference is the starting point for every other comparison. SOXX concentrates exposure on chip designers, manufacturers, equipment makers and related semiconductor businesses. FTEC can own those businesses, but also holds software, hardware, technology-services and other information-technology companies. It is therefore a sector fund, not a total-market fund, even though its basket is much broader than SOXX’s.
How do their mandates, indexes and breadth compare?
SOXX follows the NYSE Semiconductor Index, whereas FTEC follows the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The first index is built around one industry; the second covers the U.S. information-technology sector under a broader index methodology.
#1 Best Overall
| Attribute | SOXX | FTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Primary mandate | Semiconductor-sector exposure | Broad U.S. information-technology exposure |
| Benchmark | NYSE Semiconductor Index | MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index |
| Published holdings count | 30 on March 31, 2026 | 281 on March 31, 2026 fact sheet; 298 basket holdings on the September 30, 2026 holdings page |
| Geographic description | U.S.-listed semiconductor equities | U.S. information-technology securities |
| Portfolio breadth | Narrow industry focus | Multiple technology industries, but still one economic sector |
The two FTEC holding figures are not necessarily contradictory. They are from different dates and issuer presentations, and a fund’s holdings count can change as index constituents, corporate actions and counting conventions change. Use the latest holdings file when making a trade decision rather than treating an older count as permanent.
“U.S.-listed” also matters. It describes where SOXX securities trade, not a guarantee that every operating company generates all of its revenue in the United States. FTEC’s index is described as a U.S. information-technology index, but neither fund should be treated as geographic diversification across the global stock market.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsWhich ETF has the lower fee?
FTEC is substantially cheaper on the published figures available for 2026. SOXX’s March 31, 2026 fact sheet lists a 0.34% expense ratio. Fidelity’s fund summary lists FTEC’s total annual operating expenses at 0.084% (the summary is identified as a 2025 fund document).
| Cost measure | SOXX | FTEC | Illustration on $10,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published annual expense ratio | 0.34% (iShares, March 31, 2026) | 0.084% (Fidelity fund summary) | About $34 versus $8.40 per year, before compounding and assuming the rates remain unchanged |
| Difference | FTEC is 0.256 percentage points lower on these published figures | About $25.60 less per year on $10,000 at the stated rates | |
The dollar illustration is not a promise of what an investor will pay. Expenses are reflected in fund assets, the ratios can change, and investment gains or losses make the account balance move. A lower fee helps only if the fund’s exposure is appropriate for your objective; paying less for the wrong sector allocation is not diversification.
Is SOXX more concentrated than FTEC?
Yes. SOXX’s 30-stock portfolio is concentrated by industry and by security count. FTEC’s roughly 281-to-298 reported holdings spread exposure across more technology companies, but its largest positions still make the fund meaningfully top-heavy.
SOXX’s concentration is intentional
With only 30 holdings, a company-specific event or a broad semiconductor cycle can affect a substantial portion of SOXX at once. The concentration is the feature an investor is buying: the fund is designed to make a portfolio more sensitive to semiconductor conditions rather than to dilute that exposure across unrelated industries.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →FTEC is broader, not evenly diversified
Fidelity’s September 30, 2026 holdings page reported NVIDIA at 17.61%, Apple at 15.95% and Microsoft at 11.18%. Together those three positions represented 44.74% of the basket, calculated from the published weights. The exact percentages will change as prices move and the index rebalances, but the snapshot demonstrates why a large holding count should not be confused with equal weighting.
FTEC therefore offers diversification among technology industries and issuers, while retaining substantial exposure to mega-cap technology companies. It can reduce single-industry concentration relative to SOXX, but it does not remove the risks of a technology-sector sell-off or a decline in its largest constituents.
Which fund has shown higher historical volatility?
On the issuer-reported three-year statistics in the available 2026 materials, SOXX was more volatile than FTEC. These are backward-looking measurements for a stated window, not forecasts and not universal risk scores.
| Risk statistic | SOXX | FTEC | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Three-year beta | 1.58 | 1.00 | Issuer-reported sensitivity to the relevant market reference over the stated three-year period |
| Three-year standard deviation | 26.87% | 17.97% | Issuer-reported historical dispersion of returns over the same type of window |
A beta of 1.58 does not mean SOXX will rise or fall 1.58 times the market every day, and a 1.00 beta does not make FTEC stable in all conditions. Standard deviation is also dependent on the dates and calculation method. The figures are useful for comparing the funds’ recent behavior, but they cannot tell you which will have the better return next year.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWhy semiconductor drawdowns can be sharper
Chip companies are tied to capital spending, inventory cycles, product transitions and demand from end markets such as computers, phones, vehicles and data centers. When expectations change, a focused semiconductor basket can reprice quickly. FTEC’s software and services holdings may respond differently, which is one reason its broader composition produced the lower reported volatility in the cited period. That relationship can reverse in a different market regime.
Does FTEC give you enough semiconductor exposure?
FTEC can provide semiconductor exposure because its information-technology universe includes chip companies, but the available fund materials do not establish a single fixed semiconductor percentage. If a specific chip allocation is the objective, SOXX is the more direct instrument; if semiconductors are only one part of a technology allocation, FTEC may be sufficient.
Do not infer “enough” from the number of semiconductor names alone. A broad technology fund can own several chip companies while their combined weight remains much smaller than in a semiconductor-sector fund. Check the current holdings and sector breakdown before buying, especially if your thesis depends on a particular sub-industry or company.
When a targeted chip tilt makes sense
- You have a diversified core portfolio elsewhere and want a deliberate semiconductor satellite.
- You understand that a 30-holding industry fund can suffer larger drawdowns than a broad technology basket.
- You are comfortable reviewing the position when the semiconductor thesis, valuation or portfolio risk changes.
When broad technology exposure is the better fit
- You want participation in technology without making chips the dominant industry exposure.
- You value the much lower published expense ratio over a long holding period.
- You prefer the lower three-year volatility reported for FTEC, while accepting that it remains a concentrated sector fund.
What portfolio role should each ETF play?
SOXX is usually best understood as a targeted satellite allocation. FTEC can serve as a broader technology-sector allocation, either as a core position within a technology sleeve or as a satellite alongside a genuinely diversified stock-market fund.
| Portfolio need | More natural fit | Reason | Important limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct semiconductor-sector exposure | SOXX | The mandate and benchmark are specifically semiconductor-focused | Industry and security concentration can amplify losses |
| Broad U.S. technology allocation | FTEC | It owns a much larger set of information-technology companies | Its largest three reported holdings totaled 44.74% on September 30, 2026 |
| Lowest published operating cost | FTEC | 0.084% versus SOXX’s 0.34% in the cited materials | Fees do not change the underlying sector risk |
| Higher sensitivity to chip-cycle upside and downside | SOXX | The focused basket makes semiconductor outcomes more influential | Historical volatility was higher in the cited three-year statistics |
| Diversification across the whole stock market | Neither by itself | Both are technology-sector ETFs | Add a broad-market allocation only if it matches your overall plan |
Holding both can create overlap rather than a clean hedge. FTEC’s semiconductor holdings may already include several companies found in SOXX, so adding SOXX increases the chip tilt unless you reduce another technology position. Review the combined portfolio, not each ticker in isolation.
How should you decide between SOXX and FTEC?
Use the following sequence before placing an order. It keeps the decision tied to portfolio purpose instead of recent headlines or return rankings.
- Define the job of the position. Write down whether you want a semiconductor tilt, a broad technology sleeve or diversification outside technology. If the answer is the last option, neither ETF directly solves it.
- Set a tolerable drawdown in advance. SOXX’s 26.87% three-year standard deviation and 1.58 beta indicate larger historical swings than FTEC’s 17.97% and 1.00. Treat those figures as context, then decide what loss would make you sell at the wrong time.
- Inspect current weights. Read the latest holdings and sector data. For FTEC, pay particular attention to mega-cap weights; for SOXX, examine how much of the portfolio is exposed to the same semiconductor cycle.
- Compare the dated costs. Use the latest prospectus or fund summary rather than assuming 0.34% and 0.084% will remain unchanged. Calculate the fee in dollars for your intended balance and holding period.
- Check overlap with existing funds. A total-market or technology fund may already own the companies you are considering. Adding SOXX to FTEC can increase concentration in shared chip names.
- Choose a rebalancing rule. Decide what would make you trim or add—such as a portfolio weight limit or a scheduled review—before market volatility tests your discipline. Do not use past returns as a substitute for that rule.
- Confirm the current fund documents and trading details. Holdings, expenses, index membership and corporate actions change. Verify the latest issuer pages and your broker’s order information immediately before trading.
What risks and common mistakes should investors avoid?
Assuming a sector ETF is a complete portfolio
Neither SOXX nor FTEC includes the full range of industries found in a broad stock-market index. A technology allocation can complement a diversified portfolio, but it should not automatically be labeled diversified simply because it owns many tickers.
Treating FTEC’s holding count as equal diversification
FTEC’s hundreds of holdings reduce dependence on a single narrow industry relative to SOXX, yet the September 30, 2026 top-three weights show how much capital can still sit in a few mega-cap companies. A holding-count comparison without weight analysis can materially understate concentration.
Reading historical risk statistics as guarantees
Beta and standard deviation describe a particular three-year period reported by each issuer. They do not predict the next semiconductor cycle, protect against losses or make one fund suitable for every investor.
Ignoring changing dates
The published numbers in this comparison carry dates for a reason. FTEC’s holdings count differed between its March 31 fact sheet and September 30 holdings page, and expense ratios can be revised. Refresh the documents before making a decision.
Buying on a return forecast
Chip demand, artificial-intelligence infrastructure, software growth and interest-rate expectations can all change market leadership. Neither issuer’s “past performance is no guarantee of future results” disclosure should be treated as a formality; it is the central warning against turning a historical chart into a forecast.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What does the announced SOXX share split change?
The iShares SOXX page announced a forward split with a record date of November 3, 2026, the split occurring after the close on November 4, and split-adjusted trading scheduled for November 5, 2026. Recheck the issuer notice and your broker before those dates because corporate-action details can change.
Recommended Free Tools
A forward split changes the number of shares and the per-share denomination. It does not, by itself, change the fund’s underlying holdings, economic exposure or the value of an investor’s position at the moment of the adjustment. A broker may display temporary processing information around the event, so use the final corporate-action instructions rather than assuming an order will be handled normally.
Which ETF is the better choice for different investors?
Choose SOXX if your priority is a deliberate semiconductor bet
SOXX is the clearer choice when you specifically want the semiconductor industry to drive a portion of portfolio results and accept concentrated, cyclical risk. Its higher published fee and historical volatility are the trade-offs for that precision.
Choose FTEC if your priority is broad technology exposure at low cost
FTEC is the more natural fit when you want exposure across U.S. information technology, prefer the lower published operating expense and want less historical volatility than SOXX. You still need to manage mega-cap concentration and remember that the fund remains a sector allocation.
Choose neither as a stand-alone “diversified” stock portfolio
If your objective is exposure across sectors, countries and company sizes, start with an appropriately broad-market strategy and treat either ETF as an optional tilt. The decision between SOXX and FTEC is about the type and intensity of technology exposure, not about replacing every other equity holding.
Bottom line: SOXX or FTEC?
SOXX is the focused semiconductor choice: 30 holdings, a 0.34% published expense ratio and higher issuer-reported three-year volatility. FTEC is the broader and cheaper technology choice: hundreds of holdings, a 0.084% published operating-expense figure and lower reported volatility, but meaningful mega-cap concentration. Match SOXX to a purposeful chip tilt and FTEC to a broader technology role, then verify current holdings, fees and corporate-action notices before trading.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I hold SOXX and FTEC at the same time?
Yes, but the combination is not automatically diversified. FTEC already owns semiconductor companies, so adding SOXX generally increases the combined portfolio’s chip and technology exposure; check the overlap and total weights before deciding how large each position should be.
Can FTEC replace a total-market ETF?
No. FTEC is designed around U.S. information technology and does not provide the same exposure to financials, health care, energy, industrials, consumer sectors or other areas of the broad market. It can be a technology sleeve, not a complete substitute for an all-sector allocation.
Why do FTEC holdings counts differ between documents?
The cited figures come from different dates and issuer documents: 281 holdings on the March 31, 2026 fact sheet and 298 basket holdings on the September 30, 2026 holdings page. Index changes, corporate actions and counting conventions can all affect the displayed total, so use the newest file for a current snapshot.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Does a SOXX split make the fund cheaper or less risky?
A split changes the share denomination and the number of shares outstanding in an investor’s account, not the underlying portfolio exposure. It does not lower the expense ratio or remove semiconductor-sector risk; confirm the final adjustment details with the issuer and broker.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
