Recommended Free Tools
Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is faster overall in the available CPU, graphics and AnTuTu comparisons, with its clearest advantage in demanding graphics workloads. Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 is newer, but its newer release date does not make it the stronger chip: it sits in a different product tier. If gaming or maximum performance is your priority, lean toward a well-cooled phone with the 8s Gen 3. If you are choosing a 7 Gen 4 handset, judge the whole phone—especially its price, screen, battery, camera and support—rather than expecting the chip name alone to predict value.
Which is faster, Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 or Snapdragon 7 Gen 4?
The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 leads the cited comparisons in CPU, graphics and overall AnTuTu performance. NanoReview’s database results show the advantage is much larger in graphics tests than in the PCMark productivity comparison, so the difference you notice depends on what you do and on how each phone is built.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
realme GT 6 Dual SIM 256GB ROM + 12GB RAM (GSM Only | No CDMA) Factory Unlocked 5G Smartphone (Fluid... | $1,029.00 | Buy on Amazon |
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
The scores below are comparative database results across tested phones, not measurements guaranteed for every handset. Cooling, firmware, memory configuration, screen resolution and manufacturer-set power limits can all change real-device results. NanoReview’s PCMark comparison includes 14 tested phone models using the 8s Gen 3 and five using the 7 Gen 4, so the samples are unequal; treat the figures as useful evidence, not a controlled test of two identical phones.
| Benchmark | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Reported difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 total | 1,797,821 | 1,329,936 | About 35% higher for 8s Gen 3 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 1,923 | 1,270 | About 51% higher for 8s Gen 3 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 5,179 | 4,106 | About 26% higher for 8s Gen 3 |
| Geekbench 6 compute | 9,159 | 6,746 | About 36% higher for 8s Gen 3 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 1,033; 8 FPS | 667; 5 FPS | About 55% higher for 8s Gen 3 |
| PCMark 3.0 | 15,526 | 14,769 | About 5% higher for 8s Gen 3 |
These figures use the benchmark versions named in the table. They are not interchangeable: Geekbench single-core focuses on a single CPU core, its multi-core test exercises several cores, compute evaluates accelerator performance, and Steel Nomad Light stresses graphics. PCMark 3.0 is the closest listed comparison to a broad mix of common productivity tasks, and its smaller gap suggests routine use may feel closer than the graphics scores imply. Some PCMark subtests favor the 7 Gen 4.
#1 Best Overall
- For USA Buyers: This Smartphone is not compatible/will not work with any CDMA Networks including: VERIZON, SPRINT, US CELLULAR. Please check with your network provider for 3G or 4G/LTE compatibility check before you purchase.
- Dual-SIM, Network Compatibility, SIM CARD 1 & 2 : [2G : GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 and/or 3G : HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 and/or 4G : FDD-LTE 700(B12) / 700(B13) / 700(B17) / 700(B28) / 800(B20) / 850(B5) / 850(B18) / 850(B19) / 850(B26) / 900(B8) / 1700|2100(B4) / 1800(B3) / 1900(B2) / 2100(B1) / 2600(B7) TDD-LTE 1900(B39) / 2100(B66) / 2300(B40) / 2500(B41) / 2600(B38) and/or 5G : N1 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N20 / N28 / N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N77 / N78 SA/NSA]
- 6.78 inches, LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 1264 x 2780 pixels, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
- 256GB ROM Storage, 12GB RAM
- Android 14, Realme UI 5.0, Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm), Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520), Adreno 735
How much faster is the 8s Gen 3 in practice?
The headline differences are easiest to summarize this way: roughly 35% ahead in AnTuTu 11, 51% in Geekbench 6 single-core, 26% in multi-core, 36% in Geekbench compute and 55% in Steel Nomad Light. The single-core result matters for short, bursty actions such as opening an app or processing a brief task; the multi-core result is more relevant when several demanding operations run together. The graphics result is the most important number for high-resolution 3D games, emulation and other GPU-heavy work.
Those percentages are averages or database comparisons, not a promise that an 8s Gen 3 phone will render every app 55% faster. A display running at a higher resolution can consume more GPU headroom, while a phone with better cooling may maintain its speed longer. Conversely, an aggressively tuned 7 Gen 4 handset can feel responsive in everyday apps even though its peak score is lower.
Why does the older 8s Gen 3 beat the newer 7 Gen 4?
Release date and product tier answer different questions. The 8s Gen 3 was announced in March 2024, while the 7 Gen 4 followed in May 2025; the latter is newer, but the comparison places it in Qualcomm’s 7-series rather than at the same tier as the 8s chip.
The listed CPU configurations help explain the performance lead. The 8s Gen 3 has one prime core reaching up to 3.0 GHz, four performance cores up to 2.8 GHz and three efficiency cores up to 2.0 GHz. The 7 Gen 4 lists one core up to 2.8 GHz, four up to 2.4 GHz and three up to 1.84 GHz. The comparison also lists 8 MB of L3 cache for the 8s Gen 3 against 3 MB for the 7 Gen 4. Clock ceilings and cache capacity are relevant specifications, but they do not by themselves predict sustained speed in a specific phone.
Both chips are listed as 4 nm. That shared process label does not mean they will perform identically or use power identically: chip design and the phone’s thermal and power settings still matter. A handset can reduce performance when it gets hot, and manufacturers can choose different operating limits for the same processor.
What does the CPU gap mean for ordinary tasks?
For messaging, web browsing, video playback and social apps, both platforms should be capable when paired with adequate RAM and well-optimized software. The 8s Gen 3’s higher single-core score may make heavy pages, camera processing or app launches feel quicker, but the difference can be subtle when the 7 Gen 4 phone has a fast display, clean software and sufficient storage.
Multi-core performance matters more for exporting video, compressing files, compiling code, batch photo edits and multitasking. Even there, the 26% database advantage is a ceiling for comparison rather than a guaranteed time saving. The phone’s storage speed, thermal behavior and application optimization can narrow or widen the observed gap.
Is the 8s Gen 3 better for gaming?
For demanding 3D games and graphics-heavy workloads, the 8s Gen 3 is the stronger choice based on the listed GPU benchmark results. Its Adreno 735 is paired with Qualcomm-listed gaming features including real-time hardware-accelerated ray tracing, Snapdragon Game Super Resolution and Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0. The 7 Gen 4 uses an Adreno 722.
The 8 FPS versus 5 FPS figures in Steel Nomad Light are results from that graphics test, not a promise of frame rates in a particular game. Game engines, graphics settings, screen resolution, cooling and software optimization can all change gameplay. A phone with the stronger chip can still throttle or run a game less smoothly than expected if its cooling or power policy is restrictive.
There is also a nuance in the stability metric: NanoReview reports 98% stability for the 7 Gen 4 and 90% for the 8s Gen 3 in Steel Nomad Light. Stability is a score from that test, not a direct measurement of battery life or proof that the 7 Gen 4 will maintain higher frame rates in every game. Consider it alongside the 8s Gen 3’s higher graphics result, not as a replacement for it.
What should gamers check beyond the processor?
Look for a substantial cooling system, a battery policy that does not aggressively restrict performance, and phone-level tests conducted after an extended gaming session. Check whether the handset uses a high-resolution panel that places extra load on the GPU and whether the game supports the graphics features you care about. A 120 Hz or 144 Hz panel can look smooth, but the chip and game may not sustain that rate at the chosen resolution and quality settings.
For emulation, the 8s Gen 3’s stronger CPU and GPU results provide more headroom, especially in demanding 3D titles. Compatibility still depends on the emulator, drivers, game and operating system, so benchmark leadership should be treated as an advantage rather than a guarantee that every title will run perfectly.
What do the memory, display, storage and connectivity specifications mean?
Published platform ceilings describe what a chip can support; they do not guarantee that a phone manufacturer implements every capability. The comparison source lists a substantial memory-bandwidth advantage for the 8s Gen 3, while actual display, storage and wireless performance depend on the handset’s components and configuration.
| Feature | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | What to check in the phone |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5X; up to 24 GB; listed maximum bandwidth 67.2 GB/s | LPDDR5X; up to 16 GB; listed bandwidth 33.6 GB/s | Installed RAM capacity and memory configuration |
| Display support | Up to 4K at 60 Hz or QHD+ at 144 Hz | Up to 2880 × 1800 in the comparison data | The actual panel resolution and refresh rate |
| Storage support | UFS 4.0 in Qualcomm’s brief | UFS 2.2, 3.1 and 4.0 listed by NanoReview | The storage standard the manufacturer selected |
| Connectivity | Snapdragon X70 5G; up to 6.5 Gbps downlink; Wi-Fi 7 | 5G and Wi-Fi 7 listed; up to 4.2 Gbps download in NanoReview’s comparison | Supported carrier bands, modem implementation and antenna design |
The memory-bandwidth figures are listed maxima, not a claim that every task runs twice as fast. Bandwidth is the rate at which data can move between memory and the processor; it can help workloads that move large amounts of data, but app performance also depends on the CPU, GPU, software and memory configuration. Likewise, a chip’s maximum supported RAM is not the amount installed in a particular phone.
Display ceilings are not a recommendation to buy a phone by resolution alone. The 8s Gen 3 platform’s stated support for 4K at 60 Hz or QHD+ at 144 Hz does not tell you which panel a manufacturer will use. The 7 Gen 4’s listed 2880 × 1800 ceiling also does not establish the quality, brightness or refresh rate of an actual screen.
For storage, Qualcomm’s 8s Gen 3 brief lists UFS 4.0 support, while NanoReview lists several supported UFS generations for the 7 Gen 4. The handset maker determines which storage technology appears in a model, so verify the phone specification rather than inferring its storage speed from the processor.
Connectivity specifications also need handset-level checking. The 8s Gen 3 brief identifies an X70 modem and a maximum downlink figure, while the comparison lists a maximum download figure for the 7 Gen 4. Those peak figures do not guarantee a connection at those rates: carrier spectrum, supported bands, network conditions, local availability and phone antenna design affect what you can actually receive. Both are listed with Wi-Fi 7 support.
Are their AI and camera capabilities different?
Both platforms are positioned to support AI features, but the available vendor claims use different baselines and do not establish which chip is faster in a direct 8s Gen 3-versus-7 Gen 4 AI test. The 8s Gen 3 brief describes a Hexagon NPU and fused AI accelerator architecture, with INT4, INT8, INT16 and FP16 support. Qualcomm’s 7 Gen 4 announcement describes support for on-device generative-AI assistants, large language models and Stable Diffusion image generation.
Qualcomm says the 7 Gen 4 provides a 65% AI improvement over its predecessor. That is a vendor comparison against the previous 7-series generation, not a measured advantage over the 8s Gen 3. It cannot be used to rank these two chips directly.
The specifications here do not establish that either processor will produce better photos in every phone. Camera results depend on the phone’s sensors, lenses, image-processing pipeline and manufacturer tuning, as well as the software features actually enabled on the device. Check sample photos and camera-specific specifications for the handset you are considering rather than treating the chip’s AI positioning as a camera verdict.
How do thermals, software and memory affect sustained performance?
Peak silicon capability is only one part of a phone’s behavior. A thicker chassis, vapor chamber or other cooling hardware can help a device hold higher clocks during a long game or repeated benchmark runs. A slim phone with limited thermal capacity may begin quickly and then lower power after it heats up. Firmware can also change the balance between temperature, fan or surface comfort, battery drain and speed.
RAM capacity affects how many apps remain available without reloading, while memory bandwidth affects how quickly large data sets move. Neither specification guarantees a particular multitasking experience. Check the exact RAM amount and whether storage expansion or memory-compression features are involved; virtual memory does not replace physical RAM performance.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Software support is another handset-level requirement. The platform announcements describe capabilities, but the phone maker controls operating-system updates, driver tuning and whether features such as generative AI, ray tracing or frame-generation tools are enabled. A newer 7 Gen 4 model may receive support for longer simply because it launches later, but update length is determined by the manufacturer rather than the chip name.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Which chip should you choose in a phone?
Choose by handset and price, not by processor name alone. The available comparisons make the 8s Gen 3 the performance pick, especially for graphics-heavy tasks; they do not establish the best-value phone because no handset prices or phone-to-phone test results are provided.
Choose an 8s Gen 3 phone if performance is your priority
- You play demanding 3D games, use graphics-intensive apps or care about the strongest listed benchmark performance.
- You want the higher listed CPU clocks, L3 cache and memory bandwidth, while understanding that a phone’s cooling and power limits affect sustained results.
- You have compared the actual handset’s screen, cooling, RAM, storage, battery and software support—not just its processor.
- You run emulators, high-resolution games or compute-heavy creative apps that can use the extra GPU and CPU headroom.
Consider a 7 Gen 4 phone if the complete handset suits you better
- You are considering a newer-generation 7-series handset and its price, design, display, camera or other features fit your needs.
- Your workload is mainly routine phone use, where the smaller PCMark gap is more relevant than the larger graphics-test difference.
- You value the manufacturer’s on-device AI features, but have verified which features the particular phone supports; a platform announcement does not guarantee that every feature appears in every model.
- The 7 Gen 4 model offers materially better battery capacity, cameras, ergonomics or update terms than the 8s Gen 3 alternatives you are comparing.
A practical buying checklist
- Write down the exact model and regional variant; names can hide different RAM, storage or modem configurations.
- Confirm the installed LPDDR5X capacity and the storage standard, rather than relying on the SoC’s maximum support.
- Check panel resolution and refresh rate, since a high-resolution display changes graphics load and battery use.
- Verify supported 5G bands, Wi-Fi features and antenna design for your carrier and location.
- Look for sustained gaming tests, temperature readings and performance-after-throttling results, not only a launch-day benchmark.
- Compare battery, charging, camera hardware, software-update policy and current local price. There is no universal cost winner without matching specific phones and dates.
Before buying, compare Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 phones and the specific 7 Gen 4 handsets available in your region. Check the exact model number and manufacturer specification sheet for panel, RAM, storage, supported 5G bands, battery and charging details, then look for handset-level gaming or sustained-performance testing. There is no reliable universal price verdict here: the better value depends on the actual phones and current offers, which vary by model, market and date.
How should you interpret benchmark scores before buying?
Use benchmarks to set expectations, not to predict an exact experience. The figures identify an overall performance pattern across the tested database devices, but do not reveal the conditions for every handset or settle battery life, heat, game compatibility or long-term software support.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →- Compare like with like. Keep the benchmark name and version attached to a score. An AnTuTu 11 total should not be compared casually with a different AnTuTu version, and a graphics score does not answer a CPU question.
- Look for the handset behind the result. Cooling, firmware, RAM, screen resolution and power limits can change a score. A database comparison across phones is not the same as testing two chips in otherwise identical devices.
- Match the test to your use. Steel Nomad Light is relevant to graphics performance; Geekbench separates single-core, multi-core and compute results; PCMark offers a broader productivity comparison.
- Check sustained behavior. A short peak score does not show how a device behaves after extended gaming. Look for phone-level testing that reports performance over time and the conditions under which it was measured.
- Do not infer battery life from one metric. The stability result in one graphics test is not a battery-life comparison. Battery capacity, display, radio use, software and power management all affect endurance.
- Remember the sample size. Fourteen 8s Gen 3 phones versus five 7 Gen 4 phones in the listed PCMark comparison means the averages can shift as more models are tested.
Qualcomm describes the 8s Gen 3’s features and architecture in its platform brief. For the 7 Gen 4, Qualcomm’s May 15, 2025 announcement describes its on-device AI positioning. Those materials are useful for understanding what each platform supports, while NanoReview supplies the comparative benchmark and specification figures cited here. Vendor feature claims and database test results answer different questions: support does not guarantee an implementation, and a benchmark does not describe every phone’s day-to-day behavior.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 support on-device generative AI?
Qualcomm’s announcement says the platform supports on-device generative-AI assistants, large language models and Stable Diffusion image generation. Whether a feature is available to you depends on the phone maker’s implementation and software.
How much faster is Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in AnTuTu and Geekbench?
NanoReview lists 1,797,821 versus 1,329,936 in AnTuTu 11, about 35% higher for the 8s Gen 3. Geekbench 6 is 1,923 versus 1,270 single-core, about 51% higher, and 5,179 versus 4,106 multi-core, about 26% higher.
Is Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 better for gaming?
The cited Steel Nomad Light result is 1,033 and 8 FPS for the 8s Gen 3 versus 667 and 5 FPS for the 7 Gen 4. That favors the 8s Gen 3 for demanding graphics, although cooling, resolution, drivers and game optimization determine actual frame rates.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Can a Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 phone be better than an 8s Gen 3 phone?
Yes. The processor comparison does not rank whole phones: a better screen, camera, battery, support policy or price can make a 7 Gen 4 model the better purchase for a particular person. Compare the exact models available where you live.
Will either chipset get the same 5G speeds everywhere?
No. Peak modem figures are platform specifications, not guaranteed real-world speeds. Local network coverage, supported carrier bands, congestion and the phone’s antenna design all affect connection performance.
Does the 8s Gen 3 guarantee UFS 4.0 storage in a phone?
No. Qualcomm’s brief lists UFS 4.0 support for the platform, but the manufacturer chooses the storage components for each handset. Verify the exact phone’s specification before buying.
Are both chips manufactured on a 4 nm process?
Yes, both are listed as 4 nm in the comparison. The shared process label does not erase differences in architecture, clocks, cache, cooling or power management.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsWhich Snapdragon chip is better for emulation?
The 8s Gen 3 has the stronger listed CPU and GPU results, giving it more headroom for demanding emulation. Compatibility and sustained performance still depend on the emulator, drivers, game, cooling and phone software.
The Bottom Line
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is the clear performance choice: it leads the listed AnTuTu, Geekbench and Steel Nomad Light results and offers higher CPU ceilings, cache and memory bandwidth. Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 is newer and may be the better purchase when its complete phone delivers superior cameras, battery, software support or value. Compare the exact handset, not just the Snapdragon badge.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

