Intel Core Ultra 7 355 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Which Laptop Processor Is Faster?

Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.

On specifications, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the stronger choice for heavily threaded work and integrated-graphics performance. It has 12 cores and 24 threads versus 8 cores and 8 threads in the Intel Core Ultra 7 355, and its Radeon 890M has 16 graphics cores compared with four Xe cores in Intel’s integrated graphics.

That is a specification-based conclusion, not a measured universal win. No controlled, same-laptop test of these exact processors establishes a definitive winner for CPU speed, game frame rates, thermals or battery life. Laptop cooling, firmware power limits, memory configuration and any discrete GPU can change the result, so use the processor comparison to narrow your choices and then compare complete laptop reviews.

#	Preview	Product	Price
1		ASUS TUF Gaming A14 Copilot+ PC Gaming Laptop, 14” WQXGA 16:10 165Hz Display, AMD Ryzen™ AI 9 HX...	$1,449.00	Buy on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Which processor is faster overall?

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the better starting hypothesis for sustained multicore workloads such as compiling, rendering, compression and other jobs that can use many threads. Its 12-core/24-thread design gives those applications substantially more parallel hardware than the Core Ultra 7 355’s 8 cores and 8 threads.

The AMD processor also has the stronger integrated-graphics specification. Radeon 890M provides 16 graphics cores, while the Intel chip lists four Xe cores. That advantage should make AMD laptops more promising for gaming without a discrete GPU, although game engines, drivers, memory bandwidth and laptop power settings determine actual frame rates.

#1 Best Overall

ASUS TUF Gaming A14 Copilot+ PC Gaming Laptop, 14” WQXGA 16:10 165Hz Display, AMD Ryzen™ AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 4060, 16GB LPDDR5X, 1TB PCIe® Gen 4.0 SSD, Wi-Fi 6E, Windows 11, FA401WV-WB94

• READY FOR ANYTHING – Power through your day with Windows 11 and the AMD Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 Processor, delivering up to 50 TOPs of AI performance. Take your gaming to the next level with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and NVIDIA Advanced Optimus.
• Copilot+ PCs.* A new AI era begins. - Turn your ideas from text prompts into generated artwork. With Recall, search across time to find the content you need. Understand new languages instantly with Live Captions. With Copilot+ PCs, you will be all set to transform the way you create, find and communicate.
• FAST MEMORY AND STORAGE – Multitask quickly with 16GB of LPDDR5X memory and speed up loading times with 1TB of PCIe Gen 4.0 SSD. Upgrading the storage is a breeze with the additional SSD slot.
• NEVER MISS A MOMENT – Keep up with the pros thanks to its WQXGA 165Hz display. With G-SYNC the display synchronizes with the GPU’s output to reduce lag, minimize stuttering, and eliminate visual tearing for ultra-smooth gameplay.
• BLOW AWAY THE COMPETITION – High core count CPUs create more heat when at full load. The TUF Gaming A14 is equipped to handle its high-power CPU with an upgraded pair of 89-blade dual fans.

$1,449.00

Buy on Amazon

There is no defensible universal winner for every workload. The available independent pages do not test both chips in the same laptop under identical conditions, and boost clocks alone cannot predict single-threaded performance, responsiveness or battery runtime.

How do the Core Ultra 7 355 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 specifications compare?

The following figures are manufacturer specifications. They describe what each processor family supports, not guaranteed settings in every notebook. Laptop makers can configure power, memory and cooling differently.

“Up to” values are ceilings, not promises about a particular product. A thin laptop may ship with less memory, a lower sustained power limit or a slower memory configuration than the processor supports.

What do the core, thread and clock differences mean in practice?

Why AMD has the advantage in parallel workloads

The HX 370 combines four Zen 5 cores with eight denser Zen 5c cores and exposes 24 threads. Software that can keep many threads busy can divide work across more execution resources. Examples include large software builds, 3D rendering, batch photo exports, video encoding, archive creation and some scientific or engineering applications.

More threads do not make every program proportionally faster. Serial sections, synchronization, storage speed and software scaling limit gains. A laptop that cannot sustain the processor’s configured power may also give up much of the theoretical advantage after several minutes of work.

How Intel’s hybrid layout affects workloads

The Core Ultra 7 355 uses four performance cores and four low-power efficient cores, for eight threads in the listed configuration. That layout can be entirely adequate for office applications, web work, coding, light creation and mixed workloads, particularly when the laptop is quiet and well tuned. Its lower thread count is most consequential when an application can continuously occupy many workers.

Why a higher boost clock is not a speed guarantee

AMD lists a peak of 5.1 GHz and Intel lists up to 4.7 GHz, but those are maximum boost figures under qualifying conditions. They do not tell you how many cores can reach that frequency, for how long, at what temperature or under which laptop power mode. Architecture, cache behavior, memory latency and sustained cooling all affect measured performance.

Is the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 better for gaming?

For gaming that uses only integrated graphics, AMD has the more promising specification. Radeon 890M’s 16 graphics cores and 2.9 GHz listed peak are substantially more substantial on paper than Intel Graphics with four Xe cores and a 2.5 GHz maximum dynamic frequency.

Those figures cannot be converted directly into frames per second. Integrated GPUs share system memory, so dual-channel operation, LPDDR speed, memory capacity and firmware allocation matter. Game engines also respond differently to drivers, shader throughput and CPU scheduling. A review that reports only a theoretical graphics score is not enough to choose between these laptops.

What to check in an integrated-graphics gaming test

• Use the same game version, graphics preset, resolution and upscaling setting.
• Confirm whether each laptop runs in its highest performance mode or a quieter battery mode.
• Check average and one-percent-low frame rates, not only a peak number.
• Note whether memory is operating in a dual-channel configuration and whether some RAM is reserved for the GPU.
• Look for sustained results after 20–30 minutes, because heat can reduce clocks after a short benchmark.

What changes when a discrete GPU is installed?

A discrete GPU usually determines most of the frame rate at the screen’s native resolution. The processor still influences minimum frame rates, simulation-heavy games, shader compilation and high-refresh competitive play, but the integrated Radeon-versus-Intel comparison no longer describes the graphics processor doing the rendering. Compare laptops with the same discrete GPU and similar power rating before attributing a result to the CPU.

Which processor offers better battery life and thermals?

Neither processor can be declared more efficient from the published power numbers alone. Intel specifies 25 W processor base power and 55 W maximum turbo power. AMD specifies a 28 W default TDP and a configurable range from 15 W to 54 W. Those figures describe processor operating limits, not the energy consumption of a complete laptop.

Battery runtime depends on the display’s brightness and refresh rate, battery capacity, SSD, wireless activity, firmware, background applications and whether the system is plugged in. A laptop maker can configure either chip for a quiet, low-power profile or allow higher sustained power with more fan noise. Compare full-system battery tests performed at the same brightness and workload instead of comparing processor TDP labels.

How do their AI engines compare?

AMD lists an XDNA 2 NPU with up to 50 TOPS and up to 80 TOPS for the total platform. Intel lists a 49 TOPS NPU and 40 peak graphics TOPS. The dedicated-NPU figures are therefore close on paper, while the total figures use different platform components and should not be treated as a common benchmark.

TOPS means trillions of operations per second under a specified numerical format; it is not an application benchmark. Actual local transcription, image generation, background blur or language-model speed depends on the model, precision, framework, driver and whether the software uses the NPU, GPU or CPU. Choose a laptop whose software explicitly supports the accelerator you need, then consult an application-specific test.

Which chip supports more memory and platform headroom?

AMD lists support for up to 256 GB, compared with up to 128 GB for Intel. AMD’s listed memory options are LPDDR5X-8000 or DDR5-5600; Intel lists LPDDR5X-7467 or DDR5-6400. This gives AMD a higher documented capacity ceiling and a higher listed LPDDR5X speed, while Intel’s listed DDR5 speed is higher.

These are processor support limits, not an assurance that a notebook can be upgraded to those amounts. Many thin laptops solder memory to the motherboard, and manufacturers may offer only a subset of the supported capacity. Check the exact model’s memory type, channel configuration and serviceability before buying, especially for virtual machines, large datasets or professional creative applications.

How should you expect each processor to perform in common workloads?

Compiling and software development

Large projects that build many independent files are a favorable case for the HX 370’s additional threads. Build-system settings, compiler cache, storage and thermal duration still matter. For small projects, editor responsiveness and single-thread latency may dominate, and the available specifications do not establish a winner.

3D rendering, encoding and compression

CPU renderers, software encoders and archive tools often scale across many workers, so AMD’s core and thread configuration is the safer specification-based choice for sustained jobs. Check whether the application can use a discrete GPU or hardware media engine; in those cases, the complete platform may matter more than CPU parallelism.

Office work, browsing and light creation

Both processors provide ample capability for documents, communication, web applications and ordinary photo work. At this level, keyboard quality, display readability, fan noise, wake behavior, storage and memory capacity can have a larger effect on the experience than the processor name.

Content creation on battery

Short exports may finish before heat becomes a limit, while long exports expose the laptop’s sustained power policy. Compare the same application and project on battery and AC power, and record whether the manufacturer’s performance mode changes between those states.

What do available benchmark databases actually prove?

CPU-Monkey’s side-by-side information reflects the published differences in cores, clocks, cache, graphics and power, but it is not a controlled review of identical laptops. It is useful for checking specifications, not for declaring a measured winner.

Notebookcheck maintains separate database pages: its Core Ultra 7 355 entry describes an eight-core Panther Lake notebook SoC, while its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 page reports a composite performance rating of 42.2 points. Because the pages use separate systems and test conditions, that rating cannot be read as a direct 355-versus-370 benchmark.

When a review claims that one processor is faster, inspect the test methodology. A result from a high-power 16-inch laptop may not transfer to a thin model using the same chip at a lower sustained limit.

How should you compare complete laptops before buying?

1. Identify the exact processor configuration. Confirm the model number, memory amount and whether the laptop includes a discrete GPU. Two machines with the same CPU name can have different power limits.
2. Read sustained CPU tests. Prefer repeated renders, long compilation runs or looped benchmarks that show performance after the initial burst. A single short score mainly measures boost behavior.
3. Match the power mode. Record whether the test uses Balanced, Performance or a vendor-specific mode, and whether the machine is plugged in.
4. Check cooling evidence. Look for temperature, fan-noise and clock data under load. A thin chassis may throttle sooner than a larger one with the same processor.
5. For gaming, match the graphics configuration. Compare identical discrete GPUs, or use integrated-graphics tests with the same resolution, preset and memory arrangement.
6. Evaluate battery tests as complete systems. Confirm battery capacity, screen brightness, refresh rate, wireless state and the workload used in the rundown.
7. Verify memory and upgrade options. The processor’s maximum does not guarantee that the laptop has that capacity or allows later upgrades.

What mistakes lead to a poor processor choice?

• Choosing by boost clock alone: a peak frequency does not show sustained all-core speed or efficiency.
• Treating TOPS as an AI benchmark: application support and software optimization can outweigh a one-TOPS difference.
• Assuming TDP equals battery life: display, battery size and firmware often dominate light-use runtime.
• Ignoring RAM configuration: integrated graphics are particularly sensitive to memory bandwidth and channel mode.
• Comparing unlike laptop classes: a high-power gaming chassis and an ultrathin notebook may produce very different results with the same chip.
• Using a database score as a head-to-head test: separate database pages do not control for cooling, memory or power.
• Forgetting the discrete GPU: when a laptop includes one, its power rating and cooling can matter more for games and GPU-accelerated creation.

Which processor should you choose?

Intel itself cautions that “Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families.” The same principle applies here: the Core Ultra 7 and Ryzen AI 9 names identify product families, but the laptop’s implementation determines the result.

What do the launch dates mean for availability?

AMD lists the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 launch date as July 28, 2025. Intel lists the Core Ultra 7 355 for Q1 2026. A launch date does not guarantee that every region, retailer or chassis is available at the same time, so check the exact model and warranty coverage where you intend to buy.

For a purchase decision, the practical conclusion is straightforward: start with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 when your priority is multicore throughput or integrated graphics, but do not pay a premium based only on specifications. For office work, battery life or discrete-GPU gaming, select the laptop with the better measured implementation rather than assuming the processor label decides the outcome.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do these processors include a discrete graphics card?

No. Both are laptop processors with integrated graphics; a manufacturer may pair either one with a separate graphics chip. If you plan to play demanding games or use GPU renderers, evaluate the discrete GPU model and its configured wattage separately.

Can the Core Ultra 7 355 ever outperform the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370?

Yes, a laptop with stronger cooling, a higher sustained power allowance or better firmware can outperform a poorly configured rival in a particular test. That possibility is why processor specifications should be checked against long, same-workload measurements rather than treated as a guaranteed ranking.

Are the advertised maximum memory capacities what most laptops ship with?

No. They are processor-level support ceilings. Laptop makers commonly offer smaller, sometimes soldered configurations, so verify the exact installed capacity, memory type and upgrade path in the model’s service documentation.

Does a 5.1 GHz boost guarantee a faster laptop than a 4.7 GHz model?

No. Boost frequency is a peak condition, not an all-core or sustained speed rating. Temperature, power limits, architecture, cache and the number of active cores determine how quickly a real application completes.

Quick Recap

Bestseller No. 1

ASUS TUF Gaming A14 Copilot+ PC Gaming Laptop, 14” WQXGA 16:10 165Hz Display, AMD Ryzen™ AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 4060, 16GB LPDDR5X, 1TB PCIe® Gen 4.0 SSD, Wi-Fi 6E, Windows 11, FA401WV-WB94

$1,449.00

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370CPU comparisonintegrated graphicsIntel Core Ultra 7 355laptop buying guidelaptop processors