Tesults

Tesults is a hosted test-results and test-case workspace for engineering and QA teams. It fits organizations that need automated-run analysis alongside manual checks, artifacts and delivery notifications. The broad workflow is compelling, but teams with large suites or strict data-location requirements should examine its plan limits before adopting it.

Overview

Tesults combines automated test reporting, regression analysis, artifact storage and manual case management in one service. It can keep logs, screenshots and other files with the result they explain, rather than forcing teams to assemble evidence from separate systems.

Its analysis compares runs to expose regressions and automatically flags likely flaky tests. Execution-trend reports provide a view beyond a single build, which is useful for teams tracking whether reliability is improving or recurring failures are being ignored.

Key features

Manual QA is integrated with the automated workflow. Teams can create and manage cases, import and export them as CSV, and assign test runs to team members. That combination suits release processes where scripted tests and human checklists must be visible together.

Integrations include GitHub Actions, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Mattermost, PagerDuty and Jira. Framework support covers a wide range, including JUnit 4 and 5, pytest, Jest, Playwright, Cypress, Postman, GoogleTest, ROS 2, NUnit, xUnit, MSTest, RSpec, Mocha, Selenium, Espresso, XCTest, Rust test tools and others. The breadth should accommodate mixed-language suites without requiring every project to change its test framework.

API endpoints support run explanations, flaky-test identification and run comparisons. An MCP server can query test data through compatible AI tools, giving teams an additional way to investigate results. Mobile apps for iOS and Android provide access to results and dashboards when a browser is inconvenient.

Security controls include two-factor authentication, authenticated internal and external APIs, and project-member roles with different permissions. Tesults stores data in AWS data centers in the United States, encrypts communication with TLS over HTTPS, and encrypts authentication-related data at rest. Data remains in US data centers unless a team requests access from outside the United States, in which case it may be temporarily cached on global CDNs and in the browser.

Pricing

The Free plan costs nothing, billed for a lifetime, and allows unlimited users. It limits each run to 100 test cases, each project to 5 targets, and lists and runs to 10. It includes 100 test cases per list and run, one release record, one release checklist, 50GB of total file storage, 100K total uploads and 30 days of automated-result history. This is suitable for a small project or an initial workflow, but the short history and fixed capacity make it a poor fit for sustained regression analysis on larger suites.

Standard costs $19.00 per active user per month when billed yearly, or $20.65 per active user per month when billed monthly. It removes limits on test cases, targets, lists and runs, includes 50GB per user per month and 100K uploads per user per month, keeps 90 days of results and archives 12 runs per target. It is the sensible step for teams that have outgrown the Free caps without needing a year of history.

Plus costs $37.00 per active user per month annually, or $40.22 monthly. It raises storage to 100GB per user per month, uploads to 200K per user per month, history to 365 days and archived runs to 36 per target, while retaining unlimited test cases, targets, lists and runs. Choose it when long-term trend and regression comparisons justify the higher per-user cost.

Enterprise uses a custom tailored fixed price, with customized storage, upload, retention, rate limits and support. It is intended for organizations whose governance or volume needs do not fit the standardized tiers. Tesults offers no free trial.

Platforms

Tesults is available through the web, API, iOS and Android. That mix supports CI integration, browser-based administration and mobile result access.

Who it's for

Tesults is a strong match for engineering and QA groups combining automated pipelines with manual release checks, especially those working across several test frameworks and needing flaky-test triage, run comparisons and artifact retention in one place. Small teams can start free if 30 days of history, five targets and 100-case runs are sufficient.

Look elsewhere if a project requires storage outside the United States, an open-source self-hosted deployment, or materially longer retention without moving to a higher paid tier. Teams with many active users should also model per-user pricing rather than judging the plan by its headline monthly rate.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Unified automation and manual QA: cases, assigned runs, release checklists and CI results share one workflow.
• Useful failure analysis: run comparison and flaky-test detection target two common sources of wasted debugging time.
• Broad ecosystem: framework coverage and notifications for Slack, Teams, Mattermost, PagerDuty and Jira suit heterogeneous teams.
• Strong integration surface: APIs and an MCP server support programmatic and compatible AI-assisted queries.

Cons

• Free-tier ceilings: 100 cases per run, five targets and 30 days of history quickly constrain growing suites.
• Per-user billing: Standard and Plus costs scale with every active user, even though paid plans remove core quantity limits.
• US-centered storage: teams with residency requirements outside the United States may face operational and compliance complications.
• No trial period: prospective customers must evaluate a free plan with reduced capacity or commit to paid billing.

Alternatives

Browse the Test Analytics Software category for a wider shortlist.

ReportPortal is the better choice when an open-source, self-hosted deployment and community support matter; its free community edition runs with Docker, Kubernetes or Google Cloud Marketplace.

Choose TestBeats when a credit-based model and published small-team tiers are preferable, including its $18 per month Pro 200 plan.

Allure Report suits teams seeking a free, Apache-licensed open-source reporting tool.

Buildkite is an alternative for teams that also need hosted CI capacity, with a free plan covering up to five users and 10 concurrent jobs.

Qualflare offers a free starter tier and paid test-reporting plans for teams wanting project and user caps defined around QA management.

Testspace is another hosted test-management option with published user, project and session allowances.

Argos is the alternative when open-source, MIT-licensed SDKs and platform components are a priority.

BrowserStack Test Reporting & Analytics is worth considering when BrowserStack-oriented reporting and defined test-log retention are more important than Tesults' manual-case workflow.

Verdict

Choose Tesults if your engineering or QA team wants automated result analysis, flaky-test triage, artifacts and manual test management tied to the same runs. Its framework coverage and integrations reinforce that all-in-one approach. Look elsewhere when self-hosting, non-US storage or a longer low-cost history is a primary requirement, or when per-active-user pricing will make a larger team expensive.