Oxand Simeo

Oxand Simeo is an asset-management platform for connecting portfolio condition and risk to investment planning. It is best suited to infrastructure, property and public-asset managers weighing long-term priorities. Lite offers a no-cost starting point, but it stops short of scenario simulation.

Overview

Simeo AIP centralises asset data and models ageing, risk, cost, climate impact, energy and carbon to inform multi-year plans. That makes it a stronger fit for organisations deciding how to allocate investment across a portfolio than for teams seeking only a basic inventory or condition register.

Oxand brings 25 years of asset expertise. The platform supports API, self-hosted and web deployments, with managed cloud hosting on Microsoft Azure France and EU data residency. A Kubernetes-ready self-hosted option gives organisations another deployment route.

Key features

AIP combines predictive models, multi-scenario simulation and budget optimisation with carbon and sustainability constraints. Teams can compare possible investment paths against financial and environmental priorities, while multi-failure-mode analysis and executive dashboards help carry asset-level risk into management decisions. These planning tools are the main reason to choose AIP over Lite.

Inventory adds full inventory control, bulk import, REST and GraphQL API access, and field inspections through the Simeo GO mobile app. Its unlimited buildings and sites suit larger operational inventories, but it is distinct from AIP's investment modelling focus.

Integrations include IBM Maximo, Infor EAM, CARL Software and SAP PM for CMMS; SAP and Oracle ERP; and GIS, BIM, IoT and SCADA systems. Native ERP connectivity can help fit Simeo into existing enterprise workflows. Buyers should establish which modules and connections their chosen deployment requires.

Security measures include AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS in transit, mandatory MFA, role-based permissions and enterprise SSO. Oxand describes continuous security monitoring, incident response targets, customer notification for security incidents, and backups on daily, weekly, monthly and yearly schedules. Its infrastructure is ISO 27001-certified; the platform says it aligns with ISO 55001 requirements and the NIS2 directive.

Pricing

Simeo uses a freemium model. Simeo Lite costs nothing and covers up to three buildings without infrastructure setup. It provides a portfolio condition and risk snapshot, but no simulation, so it suits small portfolios that need an initial assessment rather than investment-scenario analysis.

Simeo Inventory is paid, with custom pricing, and covers unlimited buildings and sites. Its inventory controls and field-inspection tools are relevant to larger portfolios needing operational inventory; it does not replace AIP's stated simulation and investment-planning role.

Simeo AIP uses a custom enterprise subscription scaled to portfolio size and selected modules, with no fixed list price. It is the appropriate tier for organisations that need predictive modelling, scenario analysis, budget optimisation and multi-year investment planning. The trade-off is that pricing depends on the deployment's scale and module choices rather than a published fixed fee.

Platforms

Simeo is available through web, API and self-hosted deployments. Managed cloud runs on Microsoft Azure France with EU data residency; Kubernetes-ready self-hosting provides an option for organisations that need to manage deployment themselves. Inventory field inspections use the Simeo GO mobile app.

Who it's for

Oxand identifies infrastructure operators, real estate and social-housing portfolio managers, utilities, healthcare estates and public asset managers as intended users. Simeo is most compelling when those teams must connect asset condition and risk to multi-year capital choices. A small portfolio seeking only a snapshot can start with Lite; teams needing simulation should look beyond it to AIP.

Pros and cons

• Pros: AIP links asset ageing, risk, cost and environmental impacts to multi-scenario investment planning, helping portfolio managers compare competing priorities.
• Pros: Inventory combines unlimited buildings and sites with bulk import, APIs and mobile field inspections, supporting larger operational inventories.
• Pros: Managed EU-resident cloud and Kubernetes-ready self-hosting offer different deployment approaches, backed by encryption, MFA, permissions and SSO.
• Cons: Lite is capped at three buildings and excludes simulation, limiting its usefulness for larger portfolios or investment planning.
• Cons: Inventory and AIP have custom pricing, so buyers must establish the cost for their portfolio and chosen modules.

Alternatives

For a broader shortlist, browse Capital Planning Software.

• Trimble Viewpoint Vista is worth considering when cloud-hosted or on-premises deployment and a wider set of listed platforms, including Android, iOS and Windows, matter more than Simeo's asset-condition and risk modelling focus. Its pricing is by contacting sales.
• Gordian VFA Capital Planning is a paid alternative available on Android, iOS and web; its plan is offered by demo request.
• Oracle Primavera Cloud is a paid option with Android, iOS, API and web platforms and named-user monthly plans, making it a candidate when that subscription structure fits better.
• Siemens Origin is another paid option, available on Android, API, iOS and web.
• Euna Budget offers paid Professional and Enterprise plans; its Enterprise plan is positioned for large, complex jurisdictions needing added configurability, dedicated guidance and strategic support.
• Facilities Planner is a paid alternative with API and web platforms.
• Intellis FOUNDATION is a paid iOS and web option with configurable Conditions, Needs, Projects and Plans modules.
• Nakisa Capital Projects Suite is a paid API and web option with tailored-demo pricing.

Verdict

Choose Oxand Simeo if your organisation needs to turn asset condition and risk into multi-year investment decisions, particularly across infrastructure, property or public portfolios. AIP's scenario modelling and sustainability constraints are its clearest strengths; look elsewhere if you need a fully capable simulation tier at a published price, or if a three-building snapshot is not enough and custom enterprise pricing is unsuitable.