Instead of Cubic
Cubic alternatives
Cubic combines AI pull-request reviews with codebase scans for bugs and security issues. It checks changes against the full codebase and team rules, learns from senior developers’ past comments and team feedback, and can auto-approve low-risk pull requests, score merge confidence, and let coding agents fix findings. Its plans include custom review agents and wikis, with integrations such as Jira, Linear, and Asana. Cubic supports GitHub, but not GitLab, Bitbucket, or GitHub Enterprise Server; a review covers at most 200 eligible files. The free plan allows 20 reviews a month for public repositories, while paid plans start at $30 per developer per month, billed yearly.
- 1
CodeRabbit
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+4Teams needing multi-host reviews and IDE or command-line feedback — CodeRabbit adds GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud, and Azure DevOps support, plus reviews in IDEs and the command line.
- 2
Review Board
Free plan APILinuxMac+3Teams seeking self-hosted code and document review — Review Board covers both code and document review and offers cloud or self-hosted deployment, unlike Cubic’s GitHub-focused AI reviews.
Free plan · paid from $6/user/mo · 60-day trial Visit site - 3
Graphite
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+3Teams using stacked pull requests and a merge queue — Graphite adds stacked pull-request tooling, a customizable PR inbox, and a stack-aware merge queue with CI optimizations.
Free plan · paid from $20/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial Visit site - 4
LiveReview
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+4Teams prioritizing staged-diff risk reviews across multiple hosts — LiveReview prioritizes changes by blast radius and analyzes staged diffs without uploading full repository context.
- 5
Octopus
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+4Teams needing self-hosted GitLab or Forgejo reviews — Octopus supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Forgejo, and adds source-cited codebase chat and a review CLI.
- 6
PullFlow
Free plan ExtensionLinuxMac+2Teams coordinating human and AI reviews across chat and IDEs — PullFlow syncs review activity across GitHub, Slack, and VS Code, where people and third-party AI agents can join PR threads.
Free plan · paid from $5/user/mo Visit site - 7
reviewdog
Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1Teams routing existing analyzer findings into code reviews — reviewdog routes local or CI code-analysis findings from changed lines into review comments, rather than offering Cubic’s AI codebase reviews.
Free plan Visit site - 8
AI Code Reviewer
Free plan Open source LinuxSelf-hosted - 9
Bito
Free plan ExtensionLinuxMac+3 - 10
DeepSource
Free plan APILinuxMac+3 - 11
- 12
CodePress Review
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted - 13
Greptile
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+3 - 14
Codacy
Free plan ExtensionWeb - 15
CodeKang
Free plan Self-hostedWeb - 16
Mesrai
Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+2 - 17
Korbit AI
Free plan Self-hostedWeb - 18
Merlin AI Code Review
Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted - 19
Revue
Free plan APILinuxWeb+1 - 20
Sourcery
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+4 - 21
Ito
Free plan Web - 22
Mira
Free plan Self-hostedWeb - 23
PR-Agent
Free plan APISelf-hosted - 24
Robin Review
Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb - 25
ThinkReview
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+3 - 26
PR Quorum
Free plan APIWeb - 27
Tenki Code Reviewer
Free plan LinuxMacWeb - 28
niri
Free plan Linux
Alternatives may fit better if your team uses another code host, wants self-hosting, or needs reviews outside pull requests. Review allowances can pause when exceeded unless an admin enables paid flex capacity. Compare which hosts and deployment options each product supports, where reviewers can work, and how it handles code context and team workflows. Consider whether you need broader review surfaces, stacked pull requests, or integrations with your existing tools, and weigh those differences against each product’s pricing and Cubic’s review limits.