What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
At a June 26, 2024 House hearing, then-Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo argued that the United States cannot set AI standards alone. She pointed to discussions with Korean and Japanese counterparts and U.S. work with the European Union, urging like-minded countries to align on AI safety guidelines. Her remarks support a case for international coordination—not a claim about which country is ahead in the global AI race.
What Raimondo said about AI standards
Raimondo made the argument while answering a question about international efforts to establish AI standards. The June 26, 2024 House hearing transcript records her saying: “We can’t do this — we cannot do this alone.” She referred to a meeting with Korean and Japanese counterparts that day and said the United States had started working with the EU. She called for like-minded countries to align around AI safety guidelines.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The transcript is marked unedited and cautions that statements may be inaccurate, incomplete, or misattributed. The quotation should therefore be understood as the wording recorded in that transcript, rather than as a separately verified transcript of the exchange. Read the House hearing transcript.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Why international coordination matters to her argument
AI standards are one part of a broader policy challenge: how to develop safety guidelines across borders when AI systems and their effects are not confined to one country. Raimondo’s point was that the United States would need partners to pursue alignment. Her reference to Korea, Japan, and the EU illustrates engagement; it does not establish a complete list of participating countries or show that those governments had adopted identical rules.
#1 Best Overall
A July 2023 joint op-ed by Raimondo and then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken made a broader version of the case, arguing that no country or company can shape AI’s future alone and calling for action to shape AI development. That is wider administration context, not the source or setting of her June 2024 hearing statement. Read the Raimondo–Blinken op-ed.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How this fits with her separate supply-chain remarks
Wireless networks and allied cooperation
In prepared remarks at the Virginia Innovation Forum on February 13, 2024, Raimondo discussed a different policy area: diversifying wireless supply chains. She said the United States could not do that alone and needed allies and partners. She presented open, interoperable wireless networks as a way to encourage innovation, strengthen supply chains, improve security, and potentially lower consumer costs. These remarks concern wireless infrastructure, not the AI-standards exchange at the House hearing. Read her Virginia Innovation Forum remarks.
Rank #2
- Used Book in Good Condition
Semiconductors and AI demand
In prepared remarks on CHIPS Act implementation on February 26, 2024, Raimondo connected rising generative-AI demand with the need for leading-edge chips. She described U.S. manufacturing and packaging capacity as strategic gaps at that time. Her remarks cited a Department of Commerce figure that training one frontier AI model could require tens of thousands of leading-edge chips. That is a figure presented in her 2024 remarks, not an independently established current measurement or a present-day assessment of U.S. capacity. Read her CHIPS Act implementation remarks.
Recommended Free Tools
Quick Recap
What the remarks do—and do not—establish
- They establish her policy position: the United States should work with other countries on AI safety guidelines and standards.
- They identify examples of engagement: Raimondo mentioned Korean and Japanese counterparts and U.S. work with the EU, without presenting those examples as an exhaustive coalition.
- They do not rank countries: the cited remarks do not establish whether the United States is winning or losing the global AI race, or provide comparative measures of AI capability.
- They do not prove outcomes: the sources describe Raimondo’s arguments and policy priorities; they do not measure whether coordination has produced common standards or improved safety.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
