Choose n8n if you want the documented option to self-host and prefer billing based on workflow executions; choose Make if you want a visual scenario builder and are comfortable estimating usage by module-action credits. Neither is a universal winner: their billing units, hosting responsibilities and plan limits differ, so compare them using a real workflow you expect to run.
How n8n and Make charge for usage
The central cost difference is what each service counts. n8n says paid plans are priced by monthly workflow executions regardless of workflow complexity. Make counts credits, with most non-AI module actions using one credit each. A single Make scenario run can therefore consume a few credits or thousands, depending on its steps and the applicable AI usage rules.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
| Platform | Usage unit | What to count in your estimate |
|---|---|---|
| n8n | Workflow executions per month, regardless of complexity, according to n8n’s pricing page. | How many times workflows run in a month. Check the execution allowance and other limits on the plan you are considering. |
| Make | Credits, generally one per non-AI app operation, according to Make’s credits guide. | Count the module actions in each scenario run, then multiply by expected monthly runs. Apply the guide’s AI-specific rules where relevant. |
For Make, third-party AI app modules generally use one credit per operation, while the AI provider charges separately for tokens. Make’s own AI Provider usage depends on tokens and operations, and built-in AI costs vary by connection type. Do not treat a scenario run as one credit or assume all AI activity follows the same rate.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsEstimate one representative workflow
- Write down the trigger and actions. For n8n, record the number of times the workflow is expected to execute monthly. For Make, count module actions in one typical run.
- Multiply by expected frequency. Include ordinary and peak periods, retries or other repeat runs if they apply to your workflow.
- Include AI and provider costs. For Make, use the credit rules for the specific AI connection and account separately for third-party provider charges where applicable.
- Compare the result with live plan limits. Check execution or credit allowance alongside scheduling, concurrency, duration and other features your workflow needs.
Hosting: managed cloud or self-hosted control
n8n documents both n8n Cloud and self-hosting. Its pricing page lists Starter and Pro as hosted plans, Business as self-hosted, and Enterprise as available hosted or self-hosted. With self-hosting, you choose where the instance runs and take responsibility for operating the associated infrastructure. That can matter if your organization has specific data-location or infrastructure requirements, but it also adds maintenance work to the decision.
#1 Best Overall
Make’s pricing page presents its visual workflow service and plan tiers; the material cited here does not establish an equivalent customer-operated self-hosting option. If you need infrastructure to run in a particular environment, verify the current deployment options directly rather than assuming the services offer the same hosting model.
Workflow building and integrations
n8n: customization and APIs
n8n describes itself as a workflow automation tool that connects apps and APIs and manipulates data with little or no code. Its documentation also describes customizable workflows and custom nodes, and gives npm, Docker and n8n Cloud as ways to try or use the product. These are vendor-described capabilities, not an independent assessment of how easy a particular workflow is to build.
Rank #2
Make: visual scenarios
Make calls its workflows scenarios and foregrounds a no-code visual workflow builder. Its pricing page lists integrations, routers and filters; paid tiers add capabilities such as one-minute scheduling, API access, priority execution or team features depending on tier. Whether its visual approach fits your work depends on the scenario’s branching, data handling and integrations, not simply on the builder description.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →For either platform, verify the exact trigger, action and API behavior you need in the current integration documentation. A headline app or integration count does not establish that a connector supports the specific event, field, authentication method or operation your process requires.
Rank #3
Plan limits and governance to check
Plan names and headline allowances are only part of the comparison. Before committing, check the limits that affect how your workflow runs and who can administer it.
- Usage allowance: monthly workflow executions for n8n or credits for Make, including how AI-related usage is counted.
- Active workflows: confirm the number of workflows or scenarios your plan allows.
- Scheduling and throughput: check minimum schedule interval, concurrency, execution duration and peak-time treatment on the exact tier.
- Records and operations: review log retention, storage and data-transfer allowances where those affect your process.
- Collaboration and governance: compare team roles, SSO, audit or execution logs, environments, version control, secrets handling and enterprise controls.
- Integration fit: test the specific connectors and API operations the workflow depends on.
n8n’s pricing page lists higher-tier governance and operations capabilities including SSO/SAML/LDAP, environments, Git version control, queue mode, external secret stores and log streaming. Availability varies by tier. Make’s pricing page describes tier-specific scheduling, execution, variable, search and team features. Check the live pages for the exact limits and entitlements: n8n pricing and Make pricing.
Rank #4
- Book - powershell for sysadmins: workflow automation made easy
- Language: english
- Binding: paperback
Displayed plans and prices
The following are the vendor-published figures displayed on the pricing pages checked October 4, 2026. They are not independent price comparisons, and plan details may change. n8n’s examples below use annual billing; Make’s paid prices are the displayed examples at a 10,000-credit monthly volume.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware match| Platform and plan | Displayed price | Displayed usage allowance | Hosting or notable detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| n8n Starter | €20/month, annual billing | 2.5K executions/month | Hosted |
| n8n Pro | €50/month, annual billing | 10K executions/month | Hosted |
| n8n Business | €667/month, annual billing | 40K executions/month | Self-hosted |
| n8n Enterprise | Custom; contact sales | Not stated as a fixed allowance on the cited pricing page | Hosted or self-hosted |
| Make Free | Free | 1,000 credits/month | 15-minute minimum interval between scheduled runs |
| Make Core | $12/month at the displayed 10,000-credit volume | 10,000 credits/month | Tier features and limits apply |
| Make Pro | $21/month at the displayed 10,000-credit volume | 10,000 credits/month | Tier features and limits apply |
| Make Teams | $38/month at the displayed 10,000-credit volume | 10,000 credits/month | Includes team-oriented features; check current plan details |
| Make Enterprise | Custom | Not stated as a fixed allowance on the cited pricing page | Contact Make for terms |
Do not compare these figures as if executions and credits were interchangeable. Estimate the workload first, then compare the plan that meets it, including any hosting or governance requirements.
AI features: compare the workflow and controls
Both vendors list AI capabilities: n8n’s pricing page includes AI and agent features, while Make lists AI applications, AI Agents and AI Toolkit. Feature availability alone does not establish output quality, reliability or suitability for a particular business process. Map the actual workflow, required approvals and data controls, then account for how its AI operations are metered.
Which tool fits your needs?
| If your priority is… | Consider | Why—and what to verify |
|---|---|---|
| Running the automation on infrastructure you control | n8n | n8n documents a self-hosted option. You will need capacity to operate the instance and should confirm the plan and infrastructure meet your data-location and security requirements. |
| Billing that counts workflow runs rather than each action | n8n | Its paid pricing is based on monthly workflow executions regardless of complexity. Model the number of runs and check tier limits. |
| Building through a visual scenario canvas | Make | Make describes a no-code visual workflow builder. Confirm that the exact connectors, schedule and scenario behavior you need are supported on your tier. |
| Estimating usage from the individual steps in a workflow | Make | Credits generally reflect module actions, so a step-by-step scenario estimate can help. Apply the AI-specific rules and account for provider charges where relevant. |
| Team administration or enterprise governance | Either, subject to tier | Compare the precise roles, SSO, logs, secrets, versioning and other controls available on the proposed plans rather than assuming they are included. |
The practical choice is conditional: n8n may fit better when self-hosting, customization and execution-based billing align with your needs and you can operate the infrastructure. Make may fit better when its visual scenario builder and module-credit model suit your workflow and usage estimate. In either case, validate one real workflow against current plan gates before choosing.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.




