AWS microservices can make selected parts of an application easier to scale independently, but they do not make a workload scalable by themselves. The benefit depends on clear business-focused service boundaries, explicit contracts, sensible communication and data patterns, and a team able to operate the resulting distributed system. For some workloads, a modular monolith or SOA is the better fit.
How service boundaries affect scaling
AWS recommends dividing workloads around business domains and functionality rather than making services as small as possible. A well-defined boundary lets a team scale or change a part of the application without scaling or redeploying everything else. AWS Well-Architected summarizes the potential benefit this way: “More specific segments lead to greater agility, organizational flexibility, and scalability.” The same guidance cautions that more segments can bring higher latency, harder debugging, and additional operational work. AWS Well-Architected: REL 3, Define how to interact with services.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
For example, if product catalog traffic grows much faster than checkout traffic, separate services may let the catalog scale independently. That advantage depends on the catalog being sufficiently independent: if every catalog request requires several synchronous calls to checkout, the extra service boundaries may add delay and failure paths instead of improving the design.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Use business capabilities as a boundary test
A candidate service should own a coherent capability, have a clear purpose, and interact with other services through explicit contracts. A contract defines more than an endpoint: it includes the expected request and response, errors, compatibility expectations, and the behavior consumers can rely on. AWS guidance treats service segmentation, domain-focused services, and API service contracts as connected reliability practices. AWS Well-Architected: REL 3, How do you design your workload service architecture?
#1 Best Overall
- Adjustable Depth: 23-40'' adjustable depth is used for servers and network equipment, ensuring enough space for AV equipment, components, and cabling, while allowing you to access ports and equipment from multiple sides.
- Strong Load Capacity: Ground-Mounted Load Capacity: 500 lbs, Wall-Mounted Load Capacity: 150 lbs. The av rack is made of carbon steel for better weldability performance and can help save space while meeting your need to place multiple devices.
- User-friendly Design: Ergonomic design makes the open frame av rack easier to use. The additional top panel is able to place other items with more available space. Roller design moves anywhere and anytime, is convenient, and is more energy-saving.
- Complete Accessories: We provide the accessories you need, including 2 x Pallets, 145 x M5*10 Cross Head Screws, 4 x Casters, 4 x M10*50 Expansion Screws,10 x M6*12 Cage Nuts, 1 x Grounding Wire, 1 x User Manual.
- Wide Application: The server rack wall mount maximizes the use of available space, suitable for retail venues, classrooms, offices, and other places where space is limited.
If a proposed service is split out only because a codebase feels large, but its data and behavior remain tightly intertwined with neighboring components, the split may create distributed coordination without meaningful independent scaling or ownership.
Choose how services communicate
AWS describes API-driven, event-driven, and data-streaming approaches for microservices. These patterns serve different needs; the right choice depends on response-time requirements, coupling, recovery behavior, and data consistency. Amazon Web Services, Implementing Microservices on AWS (July 31, 2023).
| Pattern | Useful when | Important design concern |
|---|---|---|
| Synchronous API call | A caller needs an immediate response to continue its work. | Each network dependency can add latency and another possible failure point. Limit unnecessary call chains and define contract and timeout behavior. |
| Asynchronous event-driven flow | A producer can record a change and let other services react without waiting for each one to finish. | Consumers may process events later, so workflows must account for eventual consistency, retries, and recovery. |
| Data streaming | Services need to publish or consume continuing streams of data. | Specify what consumers can expect about data availability, processing, and recovery; streaming is not automatically a substitute for a request-response API. |
These are architectural patterns, not interchangeable implementation details. Use synchronous communication for a genuine immediate dependency, and consider asynchronous flows where decoupling and independent progress matter more than an immediate end-to-end result.
Rank #2
- ADJUSTABLE DEPTH: 4-Post 25U open frame server rack with 4 vertical rails and adjustable mounting depth 22" to 40" (56,0cm to 101,7cm); Compatible with various servers / switches / data / AV and other IT equipment; EIA/ECA-310-E Compliant
- EASY ASSEMBLY: Mobile network rack with easy-to-follow assembly instructions and online video; Compact flat-pack shipping to avoid damage and facilitate installation; Total product height of 50.8in (129cm) with casters, 48in (122cm) without casters
- COLD ROLLED STEEL: Durable 4 Post 19in open frame rack designed for ventilation with 25U mounting height and 1200lb (544kg) weight capacity (stationary); 3 install options included: casters, levelling feet, or base-plate to secure rack to the floor
- HARDWARE INCLUDED: Rolling computer/data rack includes cage nuts and screws to mount equipment, easy to read Units (U) and depth adjustment markings, cable management hooks for organization, and required assembly tools
- THE IT PRO'S CHOICE: Designed and built for IT Professionals, this 25U rack is backed for 2-years, including free lifetime 24/5 multi-lingual technical assistance
Design data ownership and consistency explicitly
With independently operated services, data design becomes part of the service boundary. AWS Prescriptive Guidance identifies network communication, polyglot persistence, horizontal scaling, eventual consistency, and cross-store transaction handling as relevant considerations. AWS Prescriptive Guidance: Data persistence for microservices.
Decide which service is authoritative for each business record and how other services learn about changes. Separate stores can support independent service design, but a business operation spanning multiple stores may not have one simple atomic transaction. If updates propagate asynchronously, readers and workflows need to tolerate a period in which related views have not yet caught up. Where strict consistency is essential, identify that requirement early; it can constrain how independently the services can operate.
Plan for failures, debugging, and operations
Each remote interaction introduces the possibility that a dependency is slow, unavailable, or returning an error. More services also make it harder to trace a request across components. AWS advises balancing the benefits of smaller segments against increased latency, debugging difficulty, and operational complexity. AWS Well-Architected: REL 3, Define how to interact with services
Rank #3
- Adjustable Depth: Depth adjustable from 23" to 40", this open frame server rack accommodates servers and network equipment while providing ample space for A/V gears and cable management. Enjoy easy access to ports and devices from multiple angles.
- High Weight Capacity: Supports up to 300 lbs on the floor (200 lbs when adjusted to maximum depth) and 200 lbs when wall-mounted (depth cannot be adjusted in wall-mounted mode). Made from carbon steel for superior welding performance and durability, this open frame rack is designed to save space while accommodating multiple devices.
- User-Friendly Design: Designed with your convenience in mind, this open frame server rack features an top shelf for extra storage and improved space utilization. The rolling casters let you move it effortlessly wherever you need it, making setup and movement a breeze.
- Widely Applicable: Maximize your space with this adaptable open frame server rack, designed to make the most of every inch. Ideal for retail spots, classrooms, offices, and any area where space is at a premium, it delivers practical solutions for your storage needs.
- Everything You Need: Our open-frame rack comes with fully equipped accessory kit for easy setup and secure installation: 2 x Trays, 4 x Casters, 1 x set of Screws, 16 x M6*12 Cage Nuts, 1 x Grounding Wire, 1 x Internal & External Hex Wrenches, and 1 x User Manual.
Reliability and scalability should be designed together. AWS recommends considering differentiated availability requirements and building resilience and recovery into workloads. AWS Well-Architected: Planning for recovery and AWS Well-Architected: Track change management. Not every capability needs the same availability target: a core purchase path may warrant stricter protection than optional recommendations or supplemental content.
AWS illustrates this with Amazon.com product information pages, which it describes as composed of hundreds of microservices providing discrete portions of the page. If one service is unavailable, some content can be omitted while core purchase functionality remains. This is a qualitative example from AWS, not a measured industry benchmark or a recommended service count for other systems. AWS Well-Architected: Planning for recovery
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Microservices, SOA, or a modular monolith?
Microservices are one option, not a default destination. AWS says the choice between microservices and monoliths should be made case by case, considering scale, complexity, and use case. Amazon Web Services, Implementing Microservices on AWS (July 31, 2023). A modular monolith can establish clear internal boundaries while keeping deployment and communication simpler. SOA may suit an organization that already structures systems around shared services and integration needs.
Rank #4
- 22U Universal 19 inch equipment Rack Cabinet with Locking Wheels for AV, Networking, Computer Server, Home Theater Rack-mountable Gear.
- Compatible with American 5mm and European 6mm rack mount standards. Screws packs for both are included.
- Open Front and Back, 22U Rack Spacing Design with Protective-Vented Side Panels. Front and Real Rail Rack. No Door. Textured-Matte Black Finish. Holds AV/Networking Equipment up to 18-inches Deep.
- Front locking 3" Caster Wheels move easily on carpet. 1U Blank Panel is included. Dimensions Assembled: 18” x 20” x43” with wheels. Weight Capacity is 440lbs with wheels and 550lbs without wheels.
- This Standard 19" 22U Rack is Ideal for businesses, DJs, Sound Studios,home theaters with needs to organize Server/Network Equipment, Power Amplifiers, Microphones, DVD Players, Electronics etc. Compatible with ALL AxcessAbles rack drawers, shelves, rack accessories as well as all standard 19" rack accessories in the marketplace.
| Consideration | Microservices | SOA | Modular monolith |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent scaling and deployment | Strong fit when particular capabilities need separate scaling and releases. | Can support service-level separation; the degree depends on the architecture. | Typically scales and deploys as one application, even when internal modules are distinct. |
| Latency and coupling | Network calls add latency; asynchronous patterns can reduce direct coupling. | Integration style and service boundaries determine the coupling. | Internal calls generally avoid network hops within the application. |
| Data consistency | Requires explicit ownership and cross-service consistency decisions. | Depends on how services and shared data are organized. | Can simplify transactions within one application and data boundary. |
| Failure isolation and observability | Can isolate components, but distributed failures and tracing require deliberate design. | Depends on service autonomy and integration design. | Fewer distributed interactions, though a failure in the application may affect a larger portion of it. |
| Operational ownership | Teams need to deploy, maintain, monitor, and support services independently. | Requires clear ownership and coordination across service providers and consumers. | Can be simpler to operate while preserving internal modularity. |
Decide whether to split services now
Before introducing independently deployed services, use this checklist to test whether the workload and team are ready:
- Scaling need: Is a specific capability under different load from the rest of the application, or likely to be?
- Boundary clarity: Can the capability be defined around a business domain with a clear contract and manageable dependencies?
- Latency tolerance: Can the user-facing or internal workflow tolerate the network interactions the split introduces?
- Data behavior: Are data authority, consistency expectations, and cross-store workflows understood?
- Failure behavior: Can nonessential functionality fail without taking down critical workflows, and can the system recover?
- Team ownership: Can a team take responsibility for deployment, maintenance, observability, and support of each service?
If those answers are unclear, begin with a modular monolith or a smaller number of well-bounded services. AWS microservices are easier to scale selectively when the architecture and operating model support that independence; adding service boundaries alone does not provide it.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsQuick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
