Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Faculty demographics change more slowly than student demographics because faculty are drawn from a long academic career pipeline and then filtered through hiring, promotion, appointment, and retention. The latest figures show persistent racial and ethnic underrepresentation, alongside differences by rank and job security. No single cause explains the gap, and the available figures do not provide a same-year, same-scope comparison between faculty and students.
What the latest faculty data show
In fall 2023, full-time faculty at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the 50 states and District of Columbia were 72 percent White, 13 percent Asian, 7 percent Hispanic, and 7 percent Black, according to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), published in 2026. The figures are rounded. They describe faculty composition, not a direct faculty-versus-student gap; the NCES figures cited here do not include a matched student comparison for the same year and scope. NCES, Characteristics of Postsecondary Faculty
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Other measures show that representation also varies within the faculty workforce. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP), using provisional 2023–24 IPEDS data for fall 2023, reports that women made up 37.2 percent of full professors and 54.5 percent of assistant professors. Underrepresented minorities (URM) made up 9.1 percent of full professors, including 4.5 percent Hispanic or Latino and 4.2 percent Black or African American. AAUP’s URM grouping combines specified IPEDS categories; it should not be read as a single community or identity. AAUP, Data Snapshot: Women Faculty and Faculty of Color, Fall 2023
Appointment security differs, too. In the same AAUP snapshot, 52.1 percent of full-time women faculty and 62.2 percent of full-time men held tenured or tenure-track appointments. The reported shares were 55.9 percent for URM faculty, 56.6 percent for White faculty, and 65.3 percent for Asian faculty. These are descriptive differences in the dataset, not proof of why they occur.
#1 Best Overall
- Keep track of everything from attendance to test scores
- Spiral bound
- Measures 8-1/2" x 11"
Why changing student demographics do not quickly change faculty demographics
The academic pipeline is long and costly
Faculty positions typically follow undergraduate study, graduate education, and competitive hiring. Each stage takes time, and not everyone who begins the path reaches a faculty job. The Associated Press’s April 2024 account of a U.S. Government Accountability Office report described low doctoral stipends, high living costs, and caregiving expenses as barriers experts said can make academic careers harder to pursue, particularly for people from low-income backgrounds. The account also identifies sustained support as relevant, but it does not quantify how much these factors cause the national representation gap. Associated Press, Racial diversity among college faculty lags behind other professional fields, US report finds
Hiring and prestige are unevenly distributed
A 2022 study of tenure-track faculty at U.S. PhD-granting universities, examining hiring and retention from 2011 to 2020, found inequalities in faculty production, institutional prestige, retention, and gender. It also found higher attrition among faculty trained outside the United States or employed at the university where they earned their doctorate. These patterns help explain how access to influential training institutions and hiring networks can shape who enters faculty roles and where. The study does not, by itself, establish racial causes for the national diversity gap. Nature, Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention
Advancement and appointment security shape who stays and rises
Differences across ranks mean that a more diverse cohort entering junior roles does not automatically produce comparable representation among full professors. The AAUP figures show such a rank gradient for women and URM faculty, as well as differences in access to tenured or tenure-track appointments. Promotion opportunities, appointment types, and retention all affect who remains in academic careers long enough to reach senior ranks.
Campus climate affects retention
The GAO report, as summarized by the Associated Press, identifies a supportive campus climate as relevant to whether professors stay. That finding sits alongside the measurable attrition patterns in the 2011–2020 faculty study, but neither source establishes a single cause or ranks the relative contribution of climate, finances, hiring, and career structure. It is more accurate to treat them as interacting conditions than as a proven checklist of causes.
What the statistics can—and cannot—tell you
“Faculty diversity” is not one measure. Race and ethnicity, gender, academic rank, and appointment security describe different dimensions, and a trend in one does not establish a trend in the others. The underlying populations also differ across sources: NCES reports full-time faculty at degree-granting institutions, while AAUP’s 2025 snapshot covers nonmedical instructional staff, with or without formal faculty status, at degree-granting nonprofit Title IV institutions. AAUP uses provisional 2023–24 IPEDS Human Resources data. The figures should not be treated as interchangeable.
Comparisons across schools or years are most useful when they align the population and denominator. Check whether a figure covers full-time faculty or all instructional staff, includes medical faculty, how it handles unknown race or ethnicity, and which institution types and appointment categories are counted. Also align the year and demographic categories. IPEDS categories are measurement labels, not descriptions of monolithic groups. AAUP notes that IPEDS does not collect full-time faculty salary data by race and ethnicity, so its gender-disaggregated salary data cannot support claims about racial salary differences. The snapshot’s binary gender reporting also prevents analysis of nonbinary faculty.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What universities can measure to understand progress
Representation at a single point in time cannot show where people leave the career path. Institutions can make the picture more useful by tracking movement through it, disaggregated by demographic group and institution type:
- Who applies for and enters full-time faculty roles, and at what ranks.
- Who receives tenure-track appointments and who holds contingent appointments.
- Who advances to tenure and senior ranks, and how long those transitions take.
- Who leaves, when they leave, and whether retention patterns differ across groups.
- How faculty report campus climate, alongside the limits of interpreting those reports as causal proof.
Appointment security matters to the academic mission as well as to individual careers. The AAUP reproduces the 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure: “Freedom and economic security, hence, tenure, are indispensable to the success of an institution in fulfilling its obligations to its students and to society.” That principle frames the importance of security; it is not evidence that tenure alone resolves diversity disparities.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
