What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Ice Cube called AI “demonic” during a May 2023 interview on the Full Send podcast, criticizing AI-generated music and voice imitation. His remarks focused on whether artists’ voices should be copied without permission—not on every use of artificial intelligence.
What Ice Cube said about AI
In the Full Send interview, Ice Cube discussed contemporary rap, Auto-Tune and computerized performers. He said, “I think AI is demonic,” and predicted that listeners would push back against artificial performances: “I think there’s gonna be a backlash because of A.I. I think people are gonna want things organic and not artificial.” Fox News, The FADER and Fortune reported the comments on May 22–24, 2023.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The reporting places “demonic” in the context of music and performer authenticity. It does not establish that Cube was condemning every application of AI or offering a technical assessment of the technology.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteWhy he objected to AI-generated songs
Coverage connected Cube’s comments to “Heart on My Sleeve,” a track described as using AI-generated vocals that imitated Drake and The Weeknd. The FADER reported that Cube objected to the track and said Drake should sue whoever made it. The example helps explain his concern: a generated performance can sound like a recognizable artist without being that artist’s authorized recording.
#1 Best Overall
Cube argued that listeners want to hear performers’ real voices. His concern was not simply that music is made with technology; it was that a person’s distinctive voice could be copied and used to create or distribute a new performance without that person’s approval or payment.
How he compared AI voice imitation with sampling
Cube became famous rapping over sampled music, and Fortune noted the apparent tension between that history and his criticism of AI-generated music. In the account of his position, the distinction was permission: a sample may be approved or denied by the owners of the music, while using a dead artist’s voice to make a new song without approval is different. The Independent reported his view that someone should not manipulate a person’s original voice without paying them.
Rank #2
| In Cube’s comparison | What matters to his argument |
|---|---|
| Music sampling | Song owners can approve or deny use of a sample, as described by Fortune. |
| AI-generated voice imitation | An artist’s voice could be used to make a new performance without the artist’s approval, as Cube objected. |
This is Cube’s analogy and position, not a ruling about copyright or a complete account of how the law treats samples, voice likenesses or AI-generated works.
Did Ice Cube say he would sue over an AI version of his voice?
Yes. The FADER and The Independent reported that Cube said he would sue people involved if an AI-generated version of his voice were made or distributed. The Independent also quoted him saying, “Somebody can’t take your original voice and manipulate it without having to pay.”
Those reports describe a stated intention, not a lawsuit filed by Cube, a court decision or a finding that a particular legal claim would succeed. His comments alone do not answer whether a specific use of an artist’s voice is lawful.
Quick Recap
Best Value
What the “demonic” remark does—and does not—mean
- It was a May 2023 opinion expressed during a discussion of music and computerized performers.
- It concerned AI-generated songs and voice imitation, particularly the use of an artist-like voice without approval.
- Cube predicted a listener backlash in favor of performances he considered organic or authentic; the remark is not evidence of a measured audience trend.
- His sampling comparison explains his own distinction between approved use and unauthorized imitation; it does not settle the law.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
