Google Tensor is the custom mobile processor family used in Pixel devices—not Google Cloud’s Tensor Processing Unit. Google’s current Pixel comparison pairs Tensor G6 with the Pixel 11 line and Tensor G5 with Pixel 10. Available benchmark results suggest stronger CPU scores in the tested Pixel 11 Pro models, but not stronger graphics scores across the board. The chip’s performance depends on the phone, workload and test, so no single score describes every use.
Which Pixel phones use Google Tensor?
Tensor is designed for Pixel phones rather than sold as a stand-alone consumer processor. Google’s current comparison identifies Tensor G6 with Pixel 11 models and Tensor G5 with Pixel 10. Earlier generations appeared in these devices:
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
- Tensor G1: Pixel 6 generation.
- Tensor G2: Pixel 7 generation and Pixel Tablet, among other devices.
- Tensor G3: Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro.
- Tensor G4: Pixel 9 generation.
- Tensor G5: Pixel 10 generation.
- Tensor G6: Pixel 11 line.
Google’s Pixel comparison is the source for current phone-to-chip pairings. It does not publish a complete engineering specification table for every generation, and performance can differ between phones using the same chip because the device configuration and software matter.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Google Tensor specs: what is known
Published specifications are uneven across generations. Google’s official announcement gives selected G5 details and claims; the detailed G1 configuration below comes from a secondary technical reference. These should not be mistaken for a complete, directly comparable specification sheet.
#1 Best Overall
- 6.2" OLED 428PPI, 1080x2400px, 120Hz, HDR10+, Bluetooth 5.3, 4575mAh Battery, Android 14
- 128GB 8GB RAM, Octa-core, Google Tensor G3 (4nm), Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510), Mali-G710 MP7
- Rear Camera: 50MP, f/1.7 (wide) + 12MP, f/2.2 (ultrawide), Front Camera: 10.5MP, f/2.2
- 2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900, CDMA 800/1700/1900, 3G: HSDPA 800/850/900/1700(AWS)/1900/2100, CDMA2000 1xEV-DO, 4G LTE: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/38/40/41/46/48/66/71, 5G: 1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/25/26/28/29/30/38/40/41/48/66/70/71/77/78/258/260/261 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Nano-SIM and eSIM
- Compatible with Most GSM + CDMA Carriers like T-Mobile, AT&T, MetroPCS, etc. Will Also work with CDMA Carriers Such as Verizon, Sprint.
Tensor G1
Notebookcheck lists G1 as a 5 nm system-on-chip with two Cortex-X1 cores running at up to 2.8 GHz, two Cortex-A76 cores up to 2.25 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores up to 1.8 GHz. It lists Mali-G78 MP20 graphics and Titan M2 security hardware. These specifications are reported by Notebookcheck, not a current Google specification table.
Tensor G5
Google says Tensor G5 is manufactured on a TSMC 3 nm process. In its official G5 announcement, Google describes the chip as its custom-designed mobile processor and claims up to 60% more powerful TPU performance and an average CPU that is 34% faster than the previous generation. These are Google’s comparisons, not independent benchmark scores; the announcement’s claims should be read in that context.
Google also says Gemini Nano runs 2.6 times faster and 2 times more efficiently for selected Pixel Screenshots and Recorder use cases. Those are company claims for those specific uses, not a general measure of AI performance across all applications. Google says the Tensor security core works with Titan M2 for the Tensor G3 announcement; that detail should not be assumed to describe every generation’s security design.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What is not established by the published specifications
The available official comparison is useful for matching current chips to phones, but it does not provide a complete engineering specification for each generation. Do not infer identical memory, cooling, power limits or benchmark behavior for every phone in a generation from the processor name alone.
Rank #2
- Google Pixel 10 Pro is the ultimate Pixel experience, featuring advanced AI with Gemini, unbelievable camera quality, impeccable design in two sizes, and the next-gen Google Tensor G5 chip[1]
- Unlocked Android phone gives you the flexibility to change carriers and choose your own data plan[2]; it works - Google Fi, Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, and other major carriers
- Get a head start on syncing your data before it even arrives: After you purchase your new Pixel, look for an email that explains how to transfer your photos, videos, passwords, and more in just a few quick steps[11]
- Pixel’s pro camera system makes everything look amazing, even in low light; capture more of the scene with advanced Google AI models, and bring out incredible details with 100x Pro Res Zoom, stunning 50 MP images, and super steady videos in 8K[10]
- Pixel 10 Pro is built with durable aluminum and Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for scratch and drop resistance; the 6.3-inch Super Actua display with 3,300-nit peak brightness is easy on the eyes, even in direct sunlight[3,13,18]
Tensor G5 vs G6 benchmark results
There is no single directly comparable score set covering all the evidence below. Geekbench Browser aggregates user-submitted results, Notebookcheck currently lists one G6 sample, and Tom’s Guide reports its own review testing. The numbers are useful within their stated methods and workloads, but should not be combined into a simple ranking.
Geekbench 6 CPU scores
| Source and basis | Phone | Single-core | Multi-core |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geekbench Browser user-submitted chart, accessed 2026 | Pixel 10, Tensor G5 | 1,905 | 5,400 |
| Notebookcheck, one listed result, 2026 | Pixel 11 Pro XL, Tensor G6 | 2,687 | not stated by Notebookcheck |
| Tom’s Guide review result | Pixel 11 Pro | 2,649 | 7,164 |
| Tom’s Guide review result | Pixel 11 Pro XL | 2,713 | 7,453 |
| Tom’s Guide review result | Pixel 10 Pro | 2,335 | 6,375 |
| Tom’s Guide review result | Pixel 10 Pro XL | 2,322 | 6,286 |
The Geekbench Browser figures are chart results based on user submissions, not a controlled lab run; submissions can change over time. The Geekbench Pixel chart identifies the Pixel 10 result as Geekbench 6. Notebookcheck’s Pixel 11 Pro XL entry currently shows one sample, so its 2,687 single-core result is not an average or a stable estimate of the phone’s performance distribution.
Tom’s Guide’s review comparison reports higher Geekbench 6 CPU scores for its tested Pixel 11 Pro models than for its Pixel 10 Pro comparison phones. That supports a CPU improvement in those reviewed devices and test results, not a guarantee for every workload or every phone configuration.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteGraphics results
| Phone | 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited score | Frame rate |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel 11 Pro | 3,113 points | 18.65 fps |
| Pixel 11 Pro XL | 3,249 points | 19.46 fps |
| Pixel 10 Pro | 3,134 points | 18.77 fps |
| Pixel 10 Pro XL | 3,462 points | 20.73 fps |
These are Tom’s Guide review results for the same 3DMark workload. In that comparison, the tested Pixel 11 Pro models scored slightly lower than their Pixel 10 Pro counterparts, despite posting higher CPU scores. CPU gains therefore do not establish a graphics gain.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to interpret Tensor benchmarks
A benchmark is a result for a particular device, software build, test version and workload. Before comparing scores, check the following:
- Match the test: compare Geekbench 6 with Geekbench 6, and graphics results only when the 3DMark workload is the same.
- Match the phones: model, memory, cooling, software build and power settings can affect results.
- Check the sample basis: a single uploaded result is not an average; a user-submitted chart and a reviewer’s test have different methods.
- Separate CPU, GPU and AI: improvement in one category does not establish improvement in another.
- Distinguish short tests from sustained use: a synthetic run alone does not show long-session gaming performance, thermal behavior, battery drain or everyday responsiveness.
For example, the Geekbench Browser Pixel 10 chart, Notebookcheck’s single Pixel 11 Pro XL result and Tom’s Guide’s review table are not interchangeable samples. Each answers a narrower question about the devices and method it reports.
Is Google Tensor good for gaming?
The cited evidence is not enough to give a blanket yes-or-no verdict for gaming. Tom’s Guide’s 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited results show slightly lower graphics scores for its tested Pixel 11 Pro models than for its Pixel 10 Pro comparison phones, even as its Geekbench CPU scores are higher. That is a mixed result for those models and tests—not a measurement of every game, sustained frame rate, heat or battery life.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →For a gaming decision, prioritize tests of the specific Pixel model and games you care about, especially sustained performance rather than a brief synthetic score. The figures here do not independently establish battery life, long-session thermal behavior or overall phone quality.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
