Driver FixRecommendedSound, Wi-Fi or graphics acting up? Check drivers firstFind missing or outdated drivers fast.Check DriversHalloween DealsAmazon USHalloween week deals: useful picks before month-endAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsSlow PC?RecommendedPC slow today? Run a repair scan before it gets worseResolve common Windows issues and optimize system performance.Scan Now×
Skip to content
World desk3 min

SpaceX Reveals How Close Other Satellites Get to Starlink

SpaceX says a third-party satellite was predicted to pass about 9,000 meters from Starlink five hours before closest approach. That changing estimate was not a confirmed impact or a complete measure of risk.
Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

SpaceX says one satellite on a predicted close-approach path with Starlink was estimated to pass about 9,000 meters away five hours before closest approach in late 2025. That figure describes a changing prediction—not a confirmed impact, or a complete measure of collision risk.

What SpaceX says happened

In a Stargaze update, SpaceX described a late-2025 conjunction involving a Starlink satellite and a maneuvering satellite operated by another party. The company said the other operator was not sharing ephemeris—predicted position-and-velocity data for its spacecraft—and that the predicted separation changed as the encounter approached. Five hours before closest approach, SpaceX’s system assessed the geometry as a safe miss with zero collision probability.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Those details are SpaceX’s account; the event and its prediction were not independently verified in the available reporting. The 9,000-meter estimate should therefore be understood as one snapshot in a changing forecast, not as a confirmed distance at the moment of closest approach.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Why a close-approach distance is not a collision probability

A conjunction is a forecast, not an impact

A conjunction is a predicted close approach between two orbital paths. Operators can use different alert thresholds, so the word “conjunction” alone does not mean a collision is imminent. Nor is there one universal distance at which every operator must maneuver.

#1 Best Overall
Bundle: for STARLINK Gen 3 Standard Satellite Internet Setup – Advanced Dish - Wi-Fi 6 Router + 150FT Extension Cable – High-Speed, Low-Latency Connection
  • Gen 3 Satellite Dish: Third-generation antenna delivers a stronger, more stable signal and faster performance.
  • Wi-Fi 6 Router: Modern router technology supports faster speeds, increased device capacity, and better efficiency.
  • Extra 150FT Cable Included: Extended reach for more flexible installation in large spaces or hard-to-access locations.
  • High-Speed, Low-Latency Internet: Stream HD content, video conference, or work remotely with confidence.
  • Ideal for Rural and Remote Areas: Perfect for homes, cabins, RVs, boats, and off-grid setups where wired internet isn’t available.

Uncertainty matters as well as distance

A Conjunction Data Message (CDM) represents a predicted close approach between two trajectories. A miss distance describes the forecast geometry; collision probability also depends on how uncertain each spacecraft’s predicted position is. Starlink’s technical documentation says its system generates CDMs using trajectory position and covariance information. When both trajectories include covariance, a CDM can contain a collision-probability value. If covariance is missing or a calculation fails, the probability field may be null even when the message includes a relative miss vector.

That distinction is important when an operator is not sharing ephemeris: a distance estimate on its own does not provide all the inputs needed to interpret risk. Starlink documentation says CDMs can draw on operator-provided ephemerides or Stargaze optical observations; those different inputs can produce distinct estimates for an event.

How many other maneuvering satellites does SpaceX say it encounters?

SpaceX’s Stargaze update says Starlink encountered conjunctions with about 650 unique maneuvering third-party satellites during 2026, and that only about half shared ephemeris. These are company-reported figures, not an independently audited inventory of every encounter involving Starlink or other satellites.

What’s actually slowing this PC down?

Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Sharing predicted trajectories helps operators assess the encounter and coordinate a response. But computing a forecast is only part of the work: operators also need to communicate, decide which spacecraft will maneuver, and do so on mission-appropriate timelines.

What maneuver thresholds do operators use?

Collision-probability thresholds are policy inputs to maneuver decisions, not universal definitions of a safe miss. NASA says operators may request conjunction alerts at different probability levels, often from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 1,000,000 or lower.

Source and date Reported threshold or comparison What it establishes
SpaceX, FCC filing recorded in FCC DA 24-1193 (2024) SpaceX reported a maneuver threshold of 1 in 1 million. A threshold SpaceX reported to the FCC; it is not a universal operator standard.
Starlink Progress 2024 report Starlink says its screening system commands a maneuver above a 1e-6 collision-probability threshold, and describes that threshold as more than 1,000 times more conservative than the standard used by other operators. This is Starlink’s characterization. It does not establish that all other operators use one shared threshold.
FCC 22-91 (2022) An earlier SpaceX description gave a Gen2 trigger of 0.00001 (1/100,000). This is a dated historical statement, distinct from the 1-in-1-million threshold SpaceX reported in 2024.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

How operators coordinate a maneuver

NASA’s Starling 1.5 experiment offers a documented example of shared screening and maneuver responsibility. NASA says its spacecraft used SpaceX’s screening service, accepted responsibility for moving, and autonomously planned and executed a maneuver that resolved a close approach with a Starlink satellite. The experiment demonstrates a coordination approach; it does not independently verify SpaceX’s separate late-2025 account.

“Usually, SpaceX takes the responsibility to move out of the way when another operator shares their predicted trajectory information.”

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

— Nathan Benz, Starling 1.5 project manager at NASA Ames, March 26, 2025

Benz said NASA’s spacecraft accepted responsibility during the experiment and autonomously planned and executed the maneuver. NASA program officer Lauri Newman described the broader goal: “A fully automated system that is flexible and adaptable between satellite constellations is ideal for an environment of multiple satellite operators, all of whom have differing criteria for mitigating collision risks.”

What the FCC reporting requirement does—and does not—mean

FCC DA 24-1193 requires SpaceX to submit semiannual reports for Gen2 covering conjunction events, satellites screened from deployment, reentries, and disposal failures. That is a regulatory reporting requirement; it does not mean the FCC publishes every conjunction event in real time.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More from the Wire

  1. World desk4 min
    How to Spot an AI Voice Scam Before Sending MoneyDon’t rely on how a caller sounds. Pause, call back through a known number, and verify the emergency with another trusted person before sending money.
  2. Mountain View desk4 min
    Google’s SynthID Detector: How to Check AI-Generated Images, Video and AudioGoogle’s SynthID Detector looks for an embedded watermark in supported images, video and audio. Here is what its results do—and do not—show.
  3. Redmond desk20 min
    How to create a link to File or Folder in Windows 11Windows 11 gives you several ways to point to a file or folder without moving or duplicating it. You can create a desktop shortcut,…
Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You DownFree scan - exact matches
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They SpreadFree repair scan

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.