The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →New Relic and Sentry overlap in application performance monitoring, but they are built around different scopes. Sentry centers on application errors, traces, and developer investigation workflows; New Relic positions itself as a broader observability platform spanning application and infrastructure telemetry. Choose by the signals your team needs and the incident workflow you want—not by a universal winner.
How do New Relic and Sentry differ?
New Relic describes a platform with more than 50 observability capabilities, including application performance monitoring (APM) with distributed tracing, infrastructure monitoring, error tracking, browser and mobile monitoring, synthetic monitoring, log management, serverless monitoring, and AIOps. Its pricing page reports more than 780 integrations; that is New Relic’s own count, not an independent audit. See New Relic’s pricing and product scope.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sentry’s materials emphasize application errors, traces, and workflows for investigating software behavior. Its integration catalog includes connections for source control, deployment, project management, notifications, and data workflows, with examples such as GitHub, Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, PagerDuty, Datadog, and Splunk. The catalog changes over time, so confirm that the integrations your team needs are currently available. Browse Sentry’s integration catalog.
| Decision area | New Relic | Sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Published emphasis | Application and infrastructure observability, with logs and digital experience monitoring among its listed capabilities. | Application errors, traces, and developer workflows. |
| Infrastructure breadth | Infrastructure monitoring is among the platform’s listed capabilities. | The reviewed materials do not establish Sentry as a like-for-like substitute for every infrastructure-monitoring capability. |
| Integration examples | The pricing page reports 780+ integrations, a vendor-published figure. | Catalog examples include GitHub, Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, PagerDuty, Datadog, and Splunk. |
Which product fits your monitoring scope?
Consider Sentry when application diagnosis is the priority
If the core need is to investigate code-level errors and follow requests through application services, Sentry merits evaluation. Its January 2026 technical article describes traces following service and database calls, including messaging paths. That explains the intended workflow; it does not independently verify trace completeness for every language, framework, or architecture. Read Sentry’s explanation of distributed tracing.
#1 Best Overall
- Used Book in Good Condition
Sentry’s Application Metrics announcement distinguishes application-level signals from infrastructure metrics such as CPU and memory. It describes metrics as a way to track known behaviors over time and connect a spike to a trace. The announcement lists 5 GB of Application Metrics per plan; this is an allowance for that product, not a total data-ingest allowance, and should not be compared directly with New Relic’s monthly ingest figure. Read Sentry’s Application Metrics announcement.
Consider New Relic when you want broader telemetry in one platform
If the monitoring requirement extends beyond application errors and traces to infrastructure, logs, browser or mobile experience, synthetics, or cloud services, New Relic’s published scope is broader. Verify that its actual integrations and telemetry cover your stack; a broad capability list does not guarantee the specific runtime, framework, or deployment support you need.
Rank #2
- Used Book in Good Condition
How should you compare pricing?
New Relic lists four editions—Free, Standard, Pro, and Enterprise—and describes pricing as usage-based. Its pricing page, last updated August 20, 2026, lists 100 GB of monthly data ingest, one full-platform user, and unlimited basic users in the Free edition. It lists $0.60 per GB for Data Plus beyond the included allowance. These are New Relic’s published terms, not a quote for a particular workload; check the live page before budgeting. Check New Relic’s current pricing.
New Relic’s billing documentation describes data-plus-user and data-plus-compute models. It identifies Core Compute as in preview, so do not treat that option as generally available without confirming its status. Review New Relic’s billing models.
The cited materials do not establish Sentry’s current live price schedule. Build a like-for-like estimate using current vendor pricing rather than inferring cost from the 5 GB Application Metrics figure or comparing it directly with New Relic’s included data ingest.
- Estimate the volume of traces, errors, logs, and other signals you expect to send.
- Include the retention period your team requires and the number of users who need advanced access.
- List relevant add-ons, synthetic checks, and other paid capabilities.
- Check which signals and user roles are included in each plan, then recalculate against observed usage.
What should you validate before choosing?
Use the same representative application and incident scenarios to evaluate both tools. Confirm details in the live product documentation and catalogs rather than assuming broad product descriptions apply to your setup.
- Map telemetry scope. Decide whether you need application traces and errors alone or also infrastructure, logs, browser experience, mobile, synthetics, and cloud-service telemetry.
- Confirm stack coverage. Check the exact languages, framework versions, runtimes, and deployment model used by your application.
- Test trace behavior. Verify sampling, propagation across services and queues, span limits, and frontend-to-backend correlation in your architecture.
- Walk through an investigation. Starting from an alert or error, see whether an engineer can reach the relevant trace, logs, release, and code context.
- Verify integrations. Check current support for your source control, ticketing, deployment, alerting, and incident-management tools.
- Model cost from real usage. Include ingest, retention, advanced-user access, synthetic checks, and required add-ons for each product.
Is either product the better choice?
There is no supported universal winner. The available product materials are vendor documentation and announcements, not an independent head-to-head test or controlled benchmark. They do not establish that either product is faster, more accurate, easier to deploy, or cheaper for a generic web application. Compare the tools against your stack, required telemetry, access needs, and incident workflow, then price the usage you expect.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
