Palaeontologists identify a candidate new dinosaur species by comparing its preserved anatomy with dinosaurs already described and asking whether it has reliable diagnostic features that distinguish it. Naming the species is a separate formal step: zoological rules govern how a name is established and anchored to a specimen, but a correctly formed name does not by itself prove that the animal was biologically distinct.
How do scientists decide whether a dinosaur is new?
They start with comparison, not naming. A specialist examines the fossil’s observable features and compares them with the anatomy of previously described dinosaurs. The key question is whether the candidate has characters that diagnose it—features, or a combination of features, that distinguish it from known taxa.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) describes this as specialist work: “much research may be needed to be sure a species has not already been described, and to decide if it is sufficiently different from existing species to describe.” The characters that matter vary by animal group, so there is no single feature or checklist that automatically makes a dinosaur a new species.
Recommended Free Tools
Age and location can help place a fossil in context, but neither alone establishes a new species. The case rests on anatomical evidence and how that evidence compares with existing descriptions.
#1 Best Overall
What makes a fossil feature diagnostic?
A diagnostic feature is evidence for distinguishing a taxon, not simply an unusual-looking detail. Researchers need to assess whether the feature is genuinely different from those in previously named dinosaurs and whether the fossil preserves it clearly enough to interpret. More complete remains may provide more anatomical points of comparison, but a complete skeleton is not a formal requirement for naming a species.
Interpretations can change as additional specimens or comparative studies become available. In evaluating competing taxonomic views, useful questions include:
- Which anatomical characters are claimed to distinguish the specimen?
- Do those characters also occur in related or previously named dinosaurs?
- How much relevant anatomy is preserved, and can it be interpreted reliably?
- Do other specimens assigned to the proposed species support the same interpretation as its name-bearing type?
- Has later comparative work changed how the evidence is understood?
Variation related to growth, pathology, individual differences or fossil distortion can complicate interpretation. Those possibilities have to be assessed case by case; they cannot be resolved by a naming rule alone.
What is a holotype, and what does it establish?
A holotype is the single specimen designated as the name-bearing reference when a species is described. The ICZN explains that “Type specimens are the objective standard of reference for the application of zoological names.” In other words, the type anchors the use of the name so that researchers can refer to the same specimen when discussing it.
Rank #3
That role is nomenclatural, not a guarantee that the specimen is average, complete or biologically representative. A type need not represent the typical individual, a particular sex or life stage, or even an entire animal. Other specimens included in the original type series may be designated paratypes, but they do not bear the name. If no single holotype was fixed and multiple specimens formed the original series, those specimens may be syntypes.
Fixing a holotype therefore answers “which specimen anchors this name?” It does not, on its own, settle “is this a distinct species?” That second question depends on the quality and interpretation of the comparative anatomical evidence.
Why a legally usable type may not make a convincing species
The rules can permit a name to be based on part of an animal, including a tooth. But a fragment can be too incomplete or widespread among related animals to provide persuasive diagnostic evidence. Legal eligibility as a type and scientific strength of a species diagnosis are different questions.
A 2024 Journal of Paleontology paper discussing Troodon formosus makes that distinction. Its authors note that the Code allows a name based on a part such as a tooth, while arguing that the relevant type tooth is undiagnostic for modern identification. They also describe nomen dubium—a name of doubtful application—as a subjective declaration of doubt, not an objective status automatically imposed by the ICZN. That is the paper’s assessment of this case, not a universal ruling about every fragment-based dinosaur name.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What must a formal species description include?
For species-group names published after 1999, the ICZN requires an explicit fixation of a holotype or syntypes and, when the type material is extant, a statement that it is or will be deposited in a named collection. The Code also recommends documenting relevant details such as specimen dimensions, locality, collection number, collector, geological age and stratigraphic position.
These details make the description and its evidence traceable for future study. A specimen’s deposition in a collection is not the same as being on public display; collection access and exhibition are separate matters.
Who decides whether a dinosaur species is new?
Taxonomic judgment belongs to specialists comparing fossils and scientific descriptions. The ICZN supplies rules for establishing and applying zoological names; it does not routinely decide whether each proposed dinosaur is biologically new. A published name can follow the formal rules while the distinctness or usefulness of the species remains open to scientific debate.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallWhen a later study challenges a name, the useful issue is the evidence: which features diagnose the specimen, how those features compare with other dinosaurs, and whether the type allows the name to be applied reliably. The presence of a formal name alone does not end that discussion.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
