The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Hostinger’s Laravel VPS is a self-managed virtual server with an optional Laravel template, CloudPanel, and root access—not a fully managed Laravel application platform. On the US page, two-year prepaid plans start at $6.49 per month and renew at $11.99; the benchmark evidence available here covers one KVM 2 server, not a live Laravel application under load. It may suit developers comfortable managing a Linux server, but the renewal cost, operational work, and security setup matter as much as the introductory rate.
What the Laravel VPS includes—and what it does not
Hostinger’s VPS onboarding offers an Ubuntu 22.04 option with a Laravel template that includes CloudPanel. The product page also lists root access, Git integration, one-click updates, automatic weekly backups, and a malware scanner. It describes the VPS as self-managed, so the server owner remains responsible for configuring and operating the application and server. Tutorials, a knowledge base, an AI assistant, and 24/7 general customer-success support are offered, but these do not make it managed Laravel hosting. Hostinger’s Laravel VPS product page describes the current offer.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
HostAdvice’s reviewer found Laravel and CloudPanel available on the tested server and identified CloudPanel and the terminal as the useful management routes. In that setup, the Laravel “Manage App” flow led toward Laravel Cloud, a separate service, rather than the expected VPS application controls. The reviewer also saw the malware scanner marked “Not installed,” while account logs showed weekly backup creation entries. Those are observations from one reviewed setup, not a guarantee of what every account will show. Before relying on either feature, identify CloudPanel and verify the scanner’s status in your own VPS.
US plan prices and resources
The following rates are from Hostinger’s US product page, accessed October 7, 2026, for two-year terms. The monthly rate is the total plan price divided by the term; all plans are paid upfront, and listed prices exclude VAT. Introductory offers and renewal rates can change, so confirm the current amount and term at checkout. Prices may differ outside the US.
#1 Best Overall
| Plan | Introductory monthly rate | Renewal monthly rate | vCPU | RAM | NVMe storage | Listed bandwidth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KVM 1 | $6.49 | $11.99 | 1 | 4 GB | 50 GB | 4 TB |
| KVM 2 | $8.99 | $14.99 | 2 | 8 GB | 100 GB | 8 TB |
| KVM 4 | $12.99 | $28.99 | 4 | 16 GB | 200 GB | 16 TB |
| KVM 8 | $25.99 | $49.99 | 8 | 32 GB | 400 GB | 32 TB |
Hostinger presents KVM 1 for simple Laravel applications and KVM 8 for more resource-intensive projects. Neither label establishes a universal workload threshold. Select resources based on PHP processes, database activity, scheduled jobs and queue workers, storage, and expected traffic; budget for the renewal rate rather than only the introductory one.
What the reported performance tests establish
HostAdvice reports benchmarking one KVM 2 instance in 2026. Its test server had two vCPUs from an AMD EPYC 9354P host, 7.8 GB usable from 8 GB allocated plus 2 GB swap, and 96 GB usable from 100 GB NVMe. It ran Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS with kernel 6.8.0-137-generic. The reviewer framed the target as a single small-to-mid-sized Laravel project with modest real traffic, but the measurements below are system benchmarks, not tests of Laravel page speed or application traffic.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
| Test category | HostAdvice’s reported result for the tested KVM 2 |
|---|---|
| CPU, single thread | 1,624.55 events/second; 0.61 ms average and 0.64 ms 95th-percentile latency |
| CPU, two threads | 2,864.02 events/second; 0.70 ms average and 1.10 ms 95th-percentile latency |
| Sequential memory | 5,865.22 MiB/s write; 7,155.43 MiB/s read |
| Sequential disk | 740 MiB/s (776 MB/s), 740 IOPS write; 749 MiB/s (785 MB/s), 748 IOPS read |
| Random 4K mixed disk | About 9,400 IOPS in each direction and about 36.7 MiB/s per direction |
| Network runs | Run one: 990.06 Mbps download and 910.87 Mbps upload; run two: 985.24 Mbps download and 947.82 Mbps upload. Reported idle latency was 0.31 ms and 0.27 ms, respectively, with zero packet loss. |
| Stress tests | CPU, memory, and disk tests each ran for 180 seconds with two workers and zero reported failures. |
These results describe that tested configuration only. They do not establish performance on another tier or in another region, future performance, uptime, PHP response time, or the throughput of a particular Laravel codebase. Benchmark units cannot be translated directly into visitor counts, requests per second, or perceived page speed. HostAdvice’s 2026 review provides the test configuration and measurements.
How to choose a tier and location
There is no evidence-based single best tier for every Laravel site. Compare the following against your own workload and operating budget:
- Compute and memory: Allow for PHP processes alongside the database, scheduled tasks, and queue workers.
- Storage: Match NVMe capacity to application files, logs, uploads, and database growth.
- Bandwidth and geography: Compare listed bandwidth with expected traffic and choose a data center near the audience. Hostinger lists locations in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America; no latency result for your visitors is established by the benchmark.
- Term and renewal: Compare the upfront commitment, introductory total, renewal amount, and applicable taxes for your region.
- Administration: Decide whether you can handle Linux server configuration, deployment, updates, backups, and security checks yourself.
HostAdvice notes that its checkout offered a location selector and latency estimates, but those do not substitute for measuring the experience of your own audience. Choose based on visitor geography and your application’s needs, not a presumed universal latency outcome.
Verdict: best suited to hands-on developers
This is a plausible option if you want root access and a preconfigured starting point, and are prepared to administer the server. The KVM 2 benchmark gives a useful, narrowly scoped view of one configuration; it is not proof of Laravel application performance across the plan range. The principal trade-off is convenience at setup versus ongoing responsibility: understand the renewal price, confirm which management route controls your app, and verify that security features are active before depending on them.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
