Employers sometimes cut pay to avoid layoffs, but a pay reduction is not a dependable one-for-one substitute for eliminating jobs. It can preserve roles when the financial problem is temporary and the savings are sufficient; it may fail when demand or staffing needs have changed, or when reduced pay leads to lower morale and employee departures.
What the evidence says about pay cuts and layoffs
A 2025 study by Antoine Bertheau, Marianna Kudlyak, Birthe Larsen, and Morten Bennedsen examined a survey linked to administrative records for 3,013 Danish firms with at least five employees. The authors found that employers adjusted headcount more often than pay after adverse shocks, although pay cuts were not unusual among firms reporting lower revenue in 2020.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
- Among firms reporting revenue reductions in 2020, 29% used some form of pay cut; 15% cut wages and 19% cut bonuses or other pay. These categories can overlap.
- About 20% of job-stayers in the linked worker-occupation-firm records experienced a nominal wage cut in 2020.
- On the layoff margin, 90% of surveyed firms agreed that avoiding the loss of skills was a concern, and 75% were concerned they might not be able to hire a suitable replacement quickly.
- When asked what total pay-cost reduction could have prevented layoffs, 61% of firms could not give a quantitative answer.
The authors’ conclusion is not that wages never fall or that layoffs are necessarily inefficient. As they put it, “We find that most firms are able to cut wages but often choose not to.” Some pay cuts may prevent some layoffs, but the study does not establish a universal conversion between a percentage reduction in pay and jobs saved. Its findings describe Danish firms during the pandemic-era shock; they should not be treated as a prediction for every employer or economy. Read the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco working paper.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteWhy a company may choose layoffs instead
A pay reduction may not address the reason for the cuts
If a business is reorganizing, eliminating a function, or changing the skills it needs, lowering everyone’s pay may not preserve the roles it intends to remove. The Danish study also records layoffs associated with reorganization, efficiency, and worker productivity considerations. In the survey, 41% of firms reported reduced sales and financial difficulties as a reason for pandemic-crisis layoffs; this was one reason among several, not a complete account of every layoff.
#1 Best Overall
- This book is in perfect condition. It has never even been opened. It is straight from the store, unmarked, in pristine condition.
Layoffs target specific costs; broad cuts spread the burden
A layoff can remove a particular role or position. A general pay reduction distributes the loss across a larger group, including employees whose work the company still needs. That approach can affect morale, effort, and retention across the organization. Employers in the study also expressed concern that lower pay could prompt employees to quit, including people they wanted to keep.
The savings may not be enough—or may not last
A pay cut produces useful savings only if its size, coverage, and duration address the financial need. If demand has fallen for the long term or a role is no longer required, a temporary reduction may postpone rather than solve the underlying problem. The study found that many firms could not quantify how much lower pay would have prevented layoffs, underscoring that there is no reliable general formula.
Rank #2
How to compare a pay cut with reducing headcount
For an employer genuinely weighing these options, compare the likely outcomes rather than assuming that a smaller payroll automatically saves jobs.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware match- Cash and time: Estimate the net savings from each option and how long the savings would be needed.
- Temporary pressure or lasting change: Decide whether the problem is a short-term cash-flow squeeze or a continuing reduction in demand or need for particular roles.
- Skills and roles to retain: Identify the work the organization still needs and how difficult or slow it would be to hire suitable replacements.
- Scope and employee response: Consider who would face a cut, whether it would be broad or targeted, and the risk of reduced morale, effort, or voluntary departures.
- Work expectations: Be explicit about whether hours, workload, or responsibilities would change. A pay cut with unchanged work can be especially difficult to explain and sustain.
- Legal and contractual obligations: Check local wage-and-hour rules, minimum wages, notice requirements, employment contracts, collective agreements, and how the change could affect overtime or worker classification.
Do not promise that a pay cut will save jobs unless a credible, transparent financial plan connects the reduction, its duration, and the positions it is intended to preserve.
Alternatives an employer can consider
Hong Kong Labour Department guidance suggests cost-saving measures that may reduce the need for retrenchment, including natural attrition, voluntary exits or retirement, retraining and redeployment, suspending recruitment, reviewing budgets and operating costs, negotiating supplier costs, reducing overhead, and seeking employee ideas for efficiency. It also discusses paid leave and mutually agreed unpaid leave in specific situations. These are options listed in Hong Kong guidance, not universal recommendations or legal entitlements elsewhere. See the Hong Kong Labour Department guidance.
The same guidance advises frank and sincere discussions if wage reductions are unavoidable and says consent should be obtained in advance in the Employment Ordinance context it addresses. In the United States, the Small Business Administration’s 2015 guidance notes that changes to wages, schedules, and furloughs can have different implications depending on worker classification and state rules. That page is an orientation, not a substitute for checking current federal and state requirements. Read the SBA guidance.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Can an employer legally cut your pay instead of laying you off?
There is no single worldwide answer. Whether an employer can reduce pay depends on the jurisdiction, applicable wage-and-hour rules, contract terms, collective agreements, notice obligations, and potentially whether the worker is classified as exempt or nonexempt. The guidance cited above is specific to Hong Kong and the United States, and the SBA page dates to 2015; neither establishes the rules for other locations or every current situation.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →If you are an employee facing a proposed reduction, ask for the new rate, effective date, expected duration, and any changes to hours or workload in writing. Check your contract and the relevant labor agency’s current guidance; for advice about your specific rights, consult qualified local employment counsel. Employers should likewise confirm applicable rules before changing pay.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
