BIZD is the index-tracking option; PBDC is actively managed and seeks current income. Neither is established as a universal winner. To compare them, look beyond the headline yield: consider how each portfolio is selected, how reported expenses treat underlying BDC costs, how concentrated the holdings are, and performance over a matched period. Both funds invest in the business development company (BDC) sector, so neither removes that sector’s credit, leverage, interest-rate, valuation, or liquidity risks.
How BIZD and PBDC choose their holdings
BIZD tracks an index
VanEck says BIZD seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Its August 31, 2026 fact sheet listed 33 index constituents and a 73.08% combined weight in the top ten. VanEck’s holdings page listed 35 holdings as of October 1, 2026, a reminder that reported counts can change. VanEck BIZD fund page · VanEck BIZD fact sheet and overview
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
PBDC uses active management
Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) is actively managed and seeks current income. Its June 30, 2026 fact sheet listed 22 issuers and named Mike Petro, CFA, as portfolio manager. The September 1, 2026 summary prospectus says the manager considers credit performance and risk, earnings and dividend prospects, interest-rate effects, leverage, balance sheets, valuation, financial strength, cash flows, and market conditions. Franklin Templeton PBDC fund page · PBDC summary prospectus, September 1, 2026
What the expense ratios include
The expense figures need context because the reported totals include acquired fund fees and expenses (AFFEs): indirect expenses attributable to the BDCs held by the ETF. They are included in the reported expense ratio, but are not paid directly from the ETF in the same way as its management fee. Compare the direct management fee with the reported total, and keep the document date attached to each figure.
| Fund and source date | Management fee | Other expenses | AFFEs | Reported total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIZD — VanEck fact sheet, August 31, 2026 | 0.40% | 0.02% | 9.27% | 9.69% gross and net expense ratio |
| PBDC — Franklin Templeton / Putnam fact sheet, June 30, 2026 | 0.75% | Not stated in the fact sheet | 12.74% | 13.49% total expense ratio |
| PBDC — SEC summary prospectus, September 1, 2026 | 0.75% | 0.00% | 11.02% | 11.77% total annual fund operating expenses |
VanEck’s October 2, 2026 fund page also reported a 9.69% total expense ratio for BIZD. The PBDC fact sheet and prospectus report different AFFE estimates and totals; they are separate disclosures from different dates, not figures to combine or silently substitute. The underlying BDC expenses are indirect, but their inclusion makes the reported total much higher than the ETF’s management fee alone. VanEck BIZD fund page · PBDC fact sheet · PBDC summary prospectus
Why the published yields do not identify a winner
Yield measures differ, and the available figures are from different dates. A 30-day SEC yield is a standardized annualized measure based on recent income; a distribution yield relates a recent distribution to the fund’s share price; and a 12-month yield reflects distributions over a trailing year. They answer different questions and can move at different speeds.
| Fund and reporting date | 30-day SEC yield | Distribution yield | 12-month yield | Distribution schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIZD — VanEck, October 2, 2026 | 9.74% | 14.20% | 12.67% | Quarterly |
| BIZD — VanEck fact sheet, August 31, 2026 | 9.27% | Not stated | 11.28% | Not stated in this snapshot |
| PBDC — Franklin Templeton / Putnam, June 30, 2026 | 10.55% | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated in this snapshot |
These snapshots do not support a current yield ranking: PBDC’s SEC yield is from June, while BIZD’s October figures include three different measures. VanEck says BIZD distributions may vary. Check both issuers’ latest standardized yield disclosures and distribution notices before comparing income; a distribution yield is not a guaranteed return or a stand-alone measure of fund quality. VanEck BIZD fund page · VanEck BIZD fact sheet and overview · PBDC fund page
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Holdings overlap, but concentration differs
Both funds hold major BDC names, but the published snapshots are not from the same date. The weights below describe those specific snapshots, not a synchronized comparison of current portfolios.
Rank #3
| Fund and snapshot date | Reported issuer or holding count | Largest listed weights |
|---|---|---|
| BIZD — VanEck holdings page, October 1, 2026 | 35 holdings | Ares Capital 14.08%; Main Street Capital 5.38%; Blue Owl Capital 5.33%; Blackstone Secured Lending 5.13% |
| PBDC — Franklin Templeton / Putnam fact sheet, June 30, 2026 | 22 issuers | Ares Capital 11.13%; Blue Owl Capital 10.23%; Blue Owl Technology Finance 10.21%; Hercules Capital 7.74%; Golub Capital 7.55% |
PBDC’s listed top-ten weights sum to roughly three quarters of its exposure, based on the individual weights in its June 30 fact sheet. BIZD’s August 31 fact sheet separately reported a 73.08% top-ten combined weight. These figures point to substantial concentration in each portfolio, but their different dates and reporting contexts do not establish a precise head-to-head concentration ranking. Both remain focused on BDCs and financials rather than providing broad-market diversification. VanEck BIZD holdings page · VanEck BIZD fact sheet · PBDC fact sheet
Matched-period performance favors PBDC, but does not settle the choice
For the three years ended June 30, 2026, PBDC returned 6.98% annualized at NAV and BIZD returned 5.18% annualized at NAV, according to their respective official fact sheets. This is a matched historical period, but it does not show that active management will outperform going forward or that past performance predicts future results. PBDC began on September 29, 2022; BIZD began on February 11, 2013, so PBDC has a shorter operating history. BIZD’s fact sheet reported a 5.36% three-year return for its index over the quarter-end period, before fund fees and brokerage expenses; that is an index figure, not an investor’s fund return. VanEck BIZD fact sheet · PBDC fact sheet
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Risks that come with BDC exposure
The ETF wrapper does not remove the risks of the underlying companies. BDCs commonly lend to or invest in less mature private companies and thinly traded public companies. The SEC-filed PBDC prospectus describes several material risks:
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware match- Credit risk: portfolio companies may struggle to pay interest or repay principal.
- Interest-rate risk: income from floating-rate assets can decline when rates fall.
- Leverage risk: borrowing can magnify gains and losses.
- Valuation and liquidity risk: some BDC assets are difficult to value, and a BDC’s market price can diverge from its reported net asset value.
- Layered costs: PBDC indirectly bears its share of the BDCs’ management, operating, and incentive fees as well as its own management fee.
VanEck likewise describes BDC investments in less mature private or thinly traded public companies as riskier than investments in established public companies. Holding a basket may spread company-specific exposure, but it cannot eliminate sector-wide credit, rate, market, or liquidity risks. PBDC summary prospectus, September 1, 2026 · VanEck BIZD fact sheet
Best Value
Which fund may fit your priorities?
- Consider BIZD if you prefer a fund that seeks to track a BDC index and want exposure structured around that index’s constituents.
- Consider PBDC if you prefer active selection and a stated current-income objective, and accept that manager decisions and the fund’s shorter record add different considerations.
- For either fund, compare the latest expense disclosures and yields on the same basis, review current holdings, and decide whether concentrated BDC-sector exposure suits your risk tolerance and portfolio.
These are comparison criteria, not personalized investment advice.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
