Benchmarketing usually means using comparisons with industry practices or peers to find ways to improve marketing. The word also has a critical technical sense: promoting a product with selective or unrepresentative benchmark results. This guide uses the first meaning, while explaining how to spot the second.
What is benchmarketing?
The term is uncommon and used inconsistently. In a marketing-strategy context, it describes comparing a company’s marketing performance with relevant practices or results, then using the comparison to identify gaps and guide action. Kirk Donlan, Product Marketing Manager at SAP Engagement Cloud, defines it as comparing performance with industry best practices to identify improvement areas and set goals; that is a vendor’s educational definition, not a neutral industry standard. Read SAP Engagement Cloud’s guide, “What is Benchmarketing?”
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
In a critical technical usage, benchmarketing means selectively presenting benchmark results to make a product look better than the evidence warrants. The two meanings share a concern with comparison, but one is a decision-making method and the other is a way a comparison can be distorted. Kevin Webber discusses the critical usage in “Ethical Benchmarks and The Texas Sharpshooter.” A dictionary-derived entry also records multiple senses, reinforcing that context matters. See the Kaikki.org entry.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Why compare marketing performance?
A channel metric can describe activity without showing whether marketing is advancing a business goal. A click-through rate, for example, does not by itself establish whether campaigns are generating qualified leads, building pipeline, or contributing to revenue. Comparisons are more useful when they help answer a business question: where is performance below a relevant reference point, and what change could plausibly improve the outcome?
#1 Best Overall
SAP Engagement Cloud’s guidance emphasizes strategic measures such as revenue growth, pipeline, lead generation, and conversion rather than relying only on channel-level activity. The appropriate KPI depends on the objective and on how the organization can reliably measure progress toward it.
How to benchmark marketing performance
- Start with a business objective. Define the outcome to improve, such as generating pipeline or increasing qualified conversions. A benchmark without a decision attached to it can become a number to chase rather than a useful guide.
- Choose KPIs that connect to the objective. Select measures that indicate progress toward the outcome, and document exactly how each is calculated. Distinguish leading indicators, such as qualified lead volume, from final outcomes, such as revenue.
- Establish your baseline. Record your own performance for a clearly defined period using the same metric definitions and tracking method you intend to use for comparison. Include relevant historical data where it helps show seasonality or change over time.
- Select a relevant comparison group. Compare against peers or industry practices only when their context is sufficiently similar. Check the factors in the next section before treating an external value as a useful reference.
- Identify a specific gap and choose a tactic. Turn the comparison into a testable action—for example, revising a campaign’s audience, offer, or landing page. A benchmark can suggest where to investigate; it does not prove which tactic will work for your organization.
- Track the result and review it on a sensible schedule. Use the same KPI definitions and measurement approach before and after the change. Decide whether to keep, adjust, or stop the tactic based on your objective and observed results, then repeat the cycle as needed.
How to compare marketing KPIs with industry averages
An “industry average” is useful only when you know what population and measurement produced it. Before comparing your result with a published figure, check:
Rank #2
- Metric definition: Are numerator, denominator, exclusions, and reporting rules the same?
- Industry and business model: Are the organizations comparable in what they sell, how they acquire customers, and how they earn revenue?
- Platform and campaign type: Does the comparison cover the same channel, placement, objective, and campaign format?
- Conversion event: Does “conversion” mean the same action in both datasets?
- Attribution model: Are conversions assigned to marketing activity using comparable attribution rules and time windows?
- Geography: Do audience, market, and currency conditions match closely enough to make the comparison meaningful?
- Time period and sample: Is the data recent and based on a clearly described, adequately relevant set of campaigns or organizations?
- Statistic type: Is the figure a mean, median, percentile, or another summary? These are not interchangeable: a mean can be pulled by unusually high or low results, while a median describes the midpoint.
These are also useful questions to ask of benchmark vendors. BenchMarketing describes contextual dimensions and its own data and services on its product page, but those are first-party claims, not independent validation of its dataset. See BenchMarketing’s “Marketing Benchmarks & Competitive Insights” page.
How to tell whether a benchmark is misleading
A benchmark can be numerically accurate for one test and still be a poor basis for a broad marketing claim. Treat it cautiously when:
- The sample or period is cherry-picked. A selected slice may not represent normal conditions or the full range of results.
- Comparisons use mismatched setups. Differences in campaign configuration, audience, workload, conversion event, or measurement rules can drive the result.
- One metric stands in for overall performance. A favorable result on a single KPI does not establish superiority across business outcomes or other channels.
- Trade-offs are hidden. A result may depend on costs, quality, reach, or other factors that matter to the decision but are not shown.
- Methodology is unclear. If the source does not explain where data came from, how the sample was assembled, when it was collected, or what statistic is reported, the comparison is difficult to assess.
Ask what was measured, under which conditions, against what comparison group, and what the result does not establish. A vendor benchmark page may be a useful source of context, but its methodology and product claims should not be treated as independently verified simply because they are published by the vendor.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to use a benchmark responsibly
Use external comparisons to generate questions, identify a possible gap, and select an experiment—not to replace your own baseline or business objective. A sound benchmark informs a decision; your organization’s consistently measured results determine whether the change helped.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
