Analyze My Writing

Analyze My Writing is a browser-based analyzer for English text, combining basic counts with readability formulas, lexical analysis, passive-voice clues, and cloze-test generation. It suits students, editors, teachers, and writers who want a broad set of measurements without paying or registering. Its main trade-off is that browser and system limits determine how much text you can process at once, and users must be adults.

Overview

Analyze My Writing turns pasted English text into a substantial diagnostic report. It counts words, sentences, and characters, measures punctuation and word or sentence length, and goes beyond simple statistics with readability scoring, vocabulary patterns, parts-of-speech tagging, and possible passive-voice detection. That range makes it more useful for examining prose than a counter-only utility, especially when you need several established readability measures in one place.

The privacy position is comparatively clear for submitted text: the policy says text is not saved or stored, and the site does not use cookies or third-party cookie code. Operational logs may still record an IP address, browser and ISP details, timestamps, referring and exit pages, and possibly click counts. The terms require users to be at least 18.

Key features

Statistics and phrase patterns

Word, sentence, and character totals give an immediate sense of length, while punctuation counts and length measures help identify dense or uneven prose. Common-word, word-pair, and word-triple lists expose repetition and recurring phrasing. A word cloud is a quick visual summary, though the lists are the more actionable tools when editing.

Readability and language analysis

Gunning Fog, Flesch-Kincaid, SMOG, Coleman-Liau, and Automated Readability indices provide several ways to estimate reading difficulty rather than relying on one score. Fry and Raygor graphs add visual interpretations that can help teaching and classroom analysis. Lexical-density calculations, parts-of-speech information, and tagged sentences are useful for studying vocabulary balance and sentence construction. The passive-voice feature flags possible instances and highlights words that commonly signal passive constructions; treat that as an editing prompt, not an automatic correction.

Cloze tests

The tool can remove every nth word, remove selected words, or remove a random percentage to create cloze exercises. Selected-word mode is limited to text under 5,000 characters, so it fits short passages and targeted lessons better than long assessments.

Pricing

Free — free. No registration is required, and text submissions are unlimited. The amount of text in one submission is limited by the browser and system, so this is not a defined large-document quota. There is no free trial because the service is free, and no paid tier or renewal term is stated. This plan is a strong fit for occasional analysis, classroom exercises, and editing projects that can be split into manageable passages.

Platforms

Analyze My Writing runs on the web and supports English sentence analysis. It is best suited to users who want a browser workflow rather than a desktop application or an integration endpoint.

Who it's for

Writers and editors can use the combination of readability scores, repetition reports, lexical density, and passive-voice signals to revise prose. Teachers and students get cloze-test creation plus supporting material for interpreting readability and lexical density. It is less suitable for minors, non-English text, or workflows that require a fixed upload-size allowance for very long documents.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Broad coverage from basic counts through five readability indices, Fry and Raygor graphs, lexical-density and tagging tools, and passive-voice indicators.
• Pros: Unlimited use without registration, with a stated policy that submitted text is not stored.
• Pros: Multiple cloze-test modes support teaching and self-study.
• Cons: One-text capacity depends on the browser and system rather than a published character or file quota.
• Cons: Selected-word cloze tests cannot handle text of 5,000 characters or more.
• Cons: English-only analysis and an 18-plus usage requirement narrow its audience.
• Cons: Possible passive-voice matches are signals to review, not definitive grammatical judgments.

Alternatives

For a broader directory of tools focused on reading difficulty, see Readability Checkers. Choose Readability Formulas instead if you want free online calculators and a Readability Scoring System across extension, macOS, web, and Windows; its free offering is freemium and its current pricing page is unavailable. ATOS Analyzer is a better fit for passages or books when a defined 25,000-character text limit and 10MB upload cap suit your workflow.

Pick Eclipse Readability Studio if you prefer a free, open-source desktop application for Linux, macOS, or Windows. ProWritingAid suits writers wanting extension-based assistance, but its free plan limits reports to 500 words, two runs per day, 10 rephrases per day, and three Sparks per day. Choose Readability Analysis Tool (RAT) for a GPLv3 open-source desktop tool with DOCX support and German readability rules.

TextGears is the stronger choice when you need API or web access and paid long-text features such as unlimited checks, translations, paraphrases, custom dictionary rules, and an option not to store texts; its PRO plan starts at $2.48 a month. AnchorKite Readability Checker is a simpler browser option that needs no signup and can work offline after loading. For programmatic document scoring, consider ApyHub Readability Scores Documents API, which offers API plans with monthly atom quotas and team or key limits.

Verdict

Choose Analyze My Writing when you want a free, registration-free English analyzer with unusually wide coverage, from phrase frequency and readability formulas to lexical density, passive-voice clues, and cloze exercises. Look elsewhere if you need desktop software, API access, non-English rules, support for minors, or a guaranteed large-document quota.