The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Market breadth measures how many securities are participating in a market move—or how many meet a defined trend condition. It adds context to a headline index: an index can rise because a few heavily weighted companies gained even while many other stocks lagged. Breadth helps describe participation, but it is not a standalone forecast of what prices will do next.
What market breadth tells you
Breadth is an internal-market measure. For a clearly defined group—such as S&P 500 constituents, Nasdaq-listed issues, or stocks in one sector—it tracks the number or share of securities advancing, declining, or meeting another condition.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This differs from a capitalization-weighted index, whose largest companies have the greatest influence on its value. Nasdaq’s October 13, 2021 discussion illustrates why the universe matters: it compared the S&P 500 with an advance/decline line based on S&P 1500 stocks. A market-wide breadth reading and an index-specific reading answer different questions.
How to measure market breadth
Advancing and declining counts
For each security in the selected universe, compare its current session close with its previous session close. Count a higher close as an advance and a lower close as a decline. Report the counts together with the universe and date so readers know what was measured.
#1 Best Overall
Unchanged issues need an explicit convention. TradingView’s documented convention classifies issues with no price change as declining. Other data sources may handle them differently.
Net advances and the advance/decline ratio
Two calculations summarize the daily counts:
- Net advances = advancing issues − declining issues. A positive result means more issues advanced than declined under the stated convention.
- A/D ratio = advancing issues ÷ declining issues. A value above 1 means advances outnumbered declines; below 1 means declines outnumbered advances.
If there are zero decliners, the simple ratio is undefined. Give the counts or describe the edge case rather than dividing by zero. Basic counts give every issue one vote, regardless of company size, index weight, or the size of its price move.
Cumulative advance/decline line
The A/D line accumulates daily net advances into a time series:
Rank #2
- Comes with secure packaging
- Easy to read text
- It can be a gift option
A/D line today = A/D line yesterday + (advancing issues today − declining issues today).
The first value is a chosen baseline, so the absolute level depends on where the series starts. Its direction, highs and lows, and relationship to a named index are more useful than comparing absolute levels across differently initialized series or vendors. Fidelity describes the line as a tool for trend confirmation and possible divergence analysis, while cautioning that its signals do not always confirm trends or forecast reversals: Fidelity’s advance/decline-line guide.
Percentage of constituents above a moving average
This measure asks what share of a specified universe has a latest close above each constituent’s own moving average:
Percentage above MA = (constituents with a close above their own MA ÷ total constituents) × 100.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →The lookback determines the horizon. TradingView documents 20-day, 50-day, and 200-day simple moving-average versions, characterized respectively as short-, medium-, and long-term measures. State both the universe and lookback; “breadth is 60%” is incomplete without them. Because the result is a percentage, it can be compared across index sizes, but differing universes, data coverage, and calculation rules still affect the comparison. See TradingView’s advance/decline-percent documentation.
Volume breadth and new highs or lows
Volume breadth weights activity by trading volume rather than counting each security equally. TradingView defines up volume as the volume of advancing constituents divided by total constituent volume, and down volume similarly for declining constituents. It answers a different question from A/D counts: how much volume is associated with each side, rather than how many securities moved that way. Fidelity also identifies the ARMS index, which incorporates volume, and 52-week highs and lows as complementary breadth indicators.
A historical glossary from the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston describes a 10-day average of issues in an index or exchange making new 52-week highs or lows. The page explicitly says the technical-analysis relationships it describes are analysts’ views and are not necessarily endorsed or validated by the Bank: Boston Fed glossary (PDF).
How to read breadth alongside an index
- Index rising and A/D line rising: more securities are contributing under the selected universe, suggesting broad or broadening participation.
- Index rising while A/D line is flat or falling: fewer securities may be carrying the index. Check whether gains are concentrated in large constituents or particular sectors; this is not by itself a sell signal.
- Index falling while A/D line rises: fewer securities may be declining than before, consistent with waning selling pressure, but it does not prove a bottom.
- Index and breadth make different highs or lows: for example, an index makes a higher high while its A/D line makes a lower high. Fidelity describes this as a possible sign of a weakening rally, not a reliable reversal call.
- A high share above a longer moving average: more of the chosen universe is in an uptrend by that specific definition. It is not automatically a buy signal; extreme readings may indicate a stretched market, while low readings may reflect widespread selling.
Nasdaq authors Brandon Bischof and Tom Hardin wrote that “The A/D Line often indicates how ‘healthy’ the market is at a given point” in their October 13, 2021 article. Treat “healthy” as their description of one way analysts use the indicator, not as an objective or predictive measure.
Recommended Free Tools
Why the market universe and date matter
A breadth figure is meaningful only with its scope and calculation defined. An exchange-wide count, a sector reading, and the share of S&P 500 constituents above their 50-day averages are not interchangeable. Nor are a daily count, a cumulative line, and a moving-average percentage: they measure daily direction, accumulated net participation, and trend status, respectively.
Best Value
When comparing readings, keep these details visible:
- the universe, such as exchange-wide issues, a named index, or a sector;
- the time horizon, including the session, cumulative period, or moving-average lookback;
- whether securities are counted equally or participation is weighted by volume;
- how unchanged issues are classified;
- the data source and any changes in index membership or coverage.
Use a consistent source and universe when comparing readings through time. Otherwise a change in coverage or membership can look like a change in market participation.
A dated example—not a current reading
Nasdaq reported that 41% of S&P 500 stocks were above their respective 50-day moving averages when its article was published on October 13, 2021, compared with nearly 70% a little over a month earlier. It also reported that Information Technology, Communications Services, and Health Care together represented 52% of S&P 500 market capitalization in the period discussed. These are historical figures from that article, not current market readings or evidence that breadth predicts future returns.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
