RTX 4090 vs RTX 3090: NVIDIA’s Next-Gen GPU Speed

The GeForce RTX 4090 and RTX 3090 represent two very different moments in NVIDIA’s flagship GPU timeline: Ampere brought massive 4K gaming and creator performance to enthusiasts, while Ada Lovelace pushed raw speed, ray tracing, and AI acceleration much further. For anyone considering an upgrade, the real question is not just which card is faster, but whether the RTX 4090’s gains justify its higher cost, power demands, and system requirements.

Across modern games, rendering engines, video workflows, and AI-assisted features, the RTX 4090 is substantially faster than the RTX 3090, often delivering a generational leap rather than a modest refresh. Its advantages are especially visible at 4K, in ray-traced titles, and in workloads that can use newer CUDA, Tensor, RT core, and DLSS 3 capabilities.

#	Preview	Product	Price
1		VIPERA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition Graphic Card	$4,649.99	Buy on Amazon
2		ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX™ 5080 16GB GDDR7 OC Edition Graphics Card | PCIe 5.0, HDMI/DP 2.1,...	$1,899.99	Buy on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This comparison focuses on practical performance differences: how the two GPUs stack up in specifications, architecture, gaming, creator applications, efficiency, pricing, and upgrade value. The goal is to clarify who benefits most from moving to NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace flagship and who can still get strong value from the previous-generation RTX 3090.

RTX 4090 vs RTX 3090 Specs at a Glance

The GeForce RTX 4090 and RTX 3090 occupy the same flagship class, but they are built around very different GPU generations. The RTX 3090 launched as NVIDIA’s Ampere halo card for 4K gaming, CUDA-heavy creation, and prosumer workloads. The RTX 4090 replaces it with the Ada Lovelace architecture, a much larger performance uplift than a simple clock-speed refresh, combining more CUDA cores, far higher boost frequencies, larger caches, faster ray tracing hardware, and support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation.

#1 Best Overall

VIPERA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition Graphic Card

• 16,384 NVIDIA CUDA Cores
• Supports 4K 120Hz HDR, 8K 60Hz HDR and variable refresh rate as indicated in HDMI 2.1A
• New streaming multiprocessors: up to 2x power and power efficiency
• Fourth generation tensor cores: up to 2x AI power
• Third-generation RT cores: up to 2x ray tracing performance

$4,649.99

Buy on Amazon

On paper, the RTX 4090’s biggest advantage is raw shader throughput. It has about 56% more CUDA cores than the RTX 3090 and runs at dramatically higher frequencies, so its theoretical FP32 compute output more than doubles. That does not mean every game or application is twice as fast, but it gives the RTX 4090 far more headroom in workloads that scale well with parallel GPU resources, such as GPU rendering, AI-assisted tools, high-resolution rasterized gaming, and heavy ray tracing.

Both cards include 24GB of GDDR6X memory, which is one reason the RTX 3090 has aged better than many gaming GPUs. Large VRAM capacity still matters for 8K timelines, high-resolution texture packs, complex Blender scenes, Unreal Engine projects, and local AI models. The RTX 4090 does not increase capacity, but it improves effective data handling through higher bandwidth and a much larger L2 cache, helping reduce trips to memory in many workloads.

The generational upgrades around RT cores, Tensor cores, and the optical flow accelerator are just as significant as the core-count increase. The RTX 4090 can accelerate ray-traced scenes more efficiently, process AI workloads faster, and use DLSS 3 Frame Generation in supported games. The RTX 3090 remains a powerful card, but its feature set is tied to the Ampere era: excellent DLSS 2 image reconstruction, strong CUDA performance, and large VRAM, without the frame-generation advantage that helps the RTX 4090 push very high perceived frame rates on demanding modern displays.

Architecture Differences: Ada Lovelace vs Ampere

The RTX 4090 is built on NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture, while the RTX 3090 uses the older Ampere design. Both are high-end GeForce GPUs aimed at 4K gaming, ray tracing, GPU rendering, and AI-accelerated work, but Ada Lovelace is a much larger step than a simple core-count increase. The RTX 4090 uses the AD102 GPU manufactured on TSMC’s custom 4N process, compared with the RTX 3090’s GA102 GPU on Samsung 8N. That process shift allows NVIDIA to push far higher clock speeds, pack in more transistors, and improve performance per watt.

At the shader level, the RTX 4090 has 16,384 CUDA cores versus 10,496 on the RTX 3090. That alone gives the newer card a large advantage in traditional rasterized workloads, but the architecture also runs at dramatically higher frequencies. The RTX 3090 typically boosts around the 1.7 GHz range, while many RTX 4090 cards operate well above 2.5 GHz under gaming loads. Combined, the extra cores and higher clocks help explain the RTX 4090 often delivers around 60% to 90% higher 4K gaming performance before factoring in newer frame-generation features.

Core architectural upgrades

• Process node: Ada Lovelace uses TSMC 4N, giving the RTX 4090 better density and efficiency than Ampere’s Samsung 8N design.
• CUDA throughput: More CUDA cores and much higher boost clocks make the RTX 4090 far faster in shader-heavy games and compute workloads.
• Ray tracing hardware: Third-generation RT cores improve ray-triangle intersection performance and add features such as Shader Execution Reordering, which helps complex ray-traced scenes run more efficiently.
• Tensor cores: Fourth-generation Tensor cores increase AI throughput and support newer acceleration paths used by DLSS 3 and AI-assisted creative tools.
• Cache design: The RTX 4090 has a much larger L2 cache, reducing pressure on memory bandwidth and helping feed the GPU at high resolutions.

One of the biggest changes is how Ada Lovelace handles ray tracing. The RTX 3090 was already strong for its generation, but the RTX 4090’s third-generation RT cores are built for heavier ray-traced workloads, especially in games that use mulle ray bounces, path-traced lighting, or dense geometry. Shader Execution Reordering can improve GPU utilization by reorganizing shading work more efficiently, which is especially useful when rays behave unpredictably across a scene. This does not make every ray-traced game twice as fast, but it gives the RTX 4090 a clear edge as visual settings become more demanding.

Ada Lovelace also introduces the Optical Flow Accelerator required for DLSS 3 Frame Generation. The RTX 3090 can use DLSS Super Resolution, but it cannot generate interpolated frames through DLSS 3 in supported games. This gives the RTX 4090 a major advantage in CPU-limited or ray-tracing-heavy titles where raw rendering alone may not fully exploit a high-refresh 4K display. Architecturally, the RTX 4090 is not just a larger RTX 3090; it is a more efficient, higher-clocked, AI-enhanced design built for the next wave of demanding games and creator applications.

Gaming Performance at 4K and High Refresh Rates

At 4K, the RTX 4090 is in a different performance class from the RTX 3090. In traditional rasterized gaming, NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace flagship is commonly around 60% to 90% faster than the Ampere flagship, depending on the game engine, graphics preset, and CPU pairing. The RTX 3090 was already a strong 4K card, but the RTX 4090 is the first GPU of its generation that consistently turns demanding 4K ultra settings into high-refresh territory rather than simply targeting 60 fps.

In heavy single-player titles such as Cyberpunk 2077, Hogwarts Legacy, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Starfield, the RTX 4090 can deliver substantially higher frame rates before upscaling is even considered. Where an RTX 3090 may sit near the 60–90 fps range at 4K ultra in many demanding games, the RTX 4090 often pushes closer to 100–160 fps in the same class of workloads. Lighter esports titles such as Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, Rainbow Six Siege, and Overwatch 2 can run far beyond that, although at very high frame rates the processor and game engine often become the limiting factors.

4K performance expectations

The biggest practical difference appears on premium 4K displays. If you use a 4K 120 Hz, 144 Hz, or 165 Hz monitor, the RTX 4090 is much better suited to filling that refresh window in visually intensive games. The RTX 3090 can still provide an excellent experience, especially with optimized settings, but it more often requires compromises such as lowering shadows, reflections, volumetrics, or using DLSS Quality to stay above 100 fps. The RTX 4090 lets more games remain at ultra or near-ultra settings while preserving the smoothness expected from a high-refresh panel.

At lower resolutions, the gap narrows. At 1440p, the RTX 4090 can run into CPU bottlenecks with even high-end processors, particularly in simulation, strategy, and competitive shooters. At 1080p, buying an RTX 4090 for gaming alone usually makes little sense unless it is paired with an extreme refresh-rate monitor and a top-tier CPU. For most gamers, the RTX 4090’s advantage over the RTX 3090 is most visible at 4K, ultrawide 1440p, multi-monitor setups, and ray-traced titles where GPU load remains high enough for the card to stretch its legs.

Ray Tracing, DLSS 3, and AI Performance Gains

The RTX 4090’s biggest generational leap over the RTX 3090 shows up when games and applications lean heavily on ray tracing and AI acceleration. NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture equips the RTX 4090 with third-generation RT cores and fourth-generation Tensor cores, while the RTX 3090 uses second-generation RT cores and third-generation Tensor cores from Ampere. In practical terms, the RTX 4090 is not just faster because it has more raw shader throughput; it is much better equipped for the specific workloads that make modern lighting, reflections, denoising, and AI upscaling demanding.

In ray-traced games, the RTX 4090 can often deliver around 70% to more than 100% higher performance than the RTX 3090, depending on the title, resolution, and settings. Lighter ray tracing workloads may land closer to the lower end of that range, while path-traced or heavily ray-traced games can widen the gap dramatically. Titles such as Cyberpunk 2077 with RT Overdrive, Alan Wake 2, and Portal with RTX are far more comfortable on the RTX 4090, especially at 4K. The RTX 3090 can still run ray tracing well, but it often needs more aggressive upscaling or reduced settings to stay near high-refresh targets.

DLSS 3 is the RTX 4090’s major advantage

The most visible feature difference is DLSS 3 Frame Generation, which is exclusive to RTX 40-series GPUs. The RTX 3090 supports DLSS Super Resolution and DLSS Ray Reconstruction in supported titles, but it cannot use Frame Generation. On the RTX 4090, DLSS 3 inserts AI-generated frames between rendered frames, substantially increasing perceived smoothness in GPU-limited scenarios. In demanding ray-traced games, this can make the difference between a playable 50–70 fps experience and a much smoother 100–140 fps presentation at 4K, assuming the base frame rate is already healthy enough for good responsiveness.

This does not mean DLSS 3 is a direct replacement for native rendering performance. Frame Generation adds latency compared with a true rendered frame, so NVIDIA Reflex is used to reduce input lag. For single-player, cinematic, open-world, racing, and simulation games, the result can be excellent. For competitive shooters where input response matters more than visual richness, traditional high native frame rates or DLSS Super Resolution without Frame Generation may still be preferable. Even so, the RTX 4090 gives players more options: native 4K, DLSS Quality, ray tracing with upscaling, or DLSS 3 for maximum smoothness.

AI and compute gains extend beyond gaming

The RTX 4090 also advances AI performance through its fourth-generation Tensor cores, higher clock speeds, and much greater overall compute throughput. In AI-assisted creative tools, image generation workloads, upscaling, denoising, and local inference tasks, the RTX 4090 can be dramatically faster than the RTX 3090. The exact uplift depends on memory use, model size, precision mode, and software optimization, but workloads that fit comfortably within 24GB of VRAM often benefit from the RTX 4090’s stronger Tensor and CUDA performance.

• Ray tracing: the RTX 4090 is typically far faster, especially in heavy RT and path-traced titles.
• DLSS support: both cards support DLSS Super Resolution, but only the RTX 4090 supports DLSS 3 Frame Generation.
• AI workloads: the RTX 4090’s newer Tensor cores and higher throughput accelerate denoising, upscaling, generation, and inference tasks.
• Best use case: 4K gaming with ray tracing enabled, high-refresh displays, and AI-heavy creative workflows.

For users focused on rasterized gaming alone, the RTX 4090 is already a major upgrade over the RTX 3090. Once ray tracing, DLSS 3, and AI acceleration enter the picture, the gap becomes even more pronounced. The RTX 3090 remains capable, helped by its 24GB of VRAM, but the RTX 4090 is the card that turns NVIDIA’s newest rendering features into a genuinely high-performance experience rather than a set of compromises.

Creator Workloads: Rendering, Video, and 3D Performance

For creators, the RTX 4090 is more than a faster gaming card; it is a major uplift for GPU-accelerated production work. Compared with the RTX 3090, NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace flagship brings higher CUDA throughput, stronger ray tracing hardware, improved Tensor cores, and dual AV1 encoders. The RTX 3090 remains capable thanks to its 24GB of GDDR6X memory, but the RTX 4090 keeps the same 24GB capacity while delivering much higher compute performance and better media hardware, making it a far stronger choice for rendering, 3D animation, visual effects, and high-resolution video workflows.

In GPU rendering engines such as Blender Cycles, OctaneRender, Redshift, and V-Ray GPU, the RTX 4090 can often be around 1.7x to 2.5x faster than the RTX 3090 depending on the scene, renderer, and use of ray tracing acceleration. Complex scenes with heavy path tracing, high sample counts, volumetrics, and large texture sets benefit most. Since both cards have 24GB of VRAM, the RTX 4090 does not necessarily allow larger projects than the RTX 3090 in memory-limited workloads, but it can finish the same frames much sooner. For freelancers and studios billing by project or render time, that performance gap can directly affect turnaround times and machine availability.

Rank #2

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX™ 5080 16GB GDDR7 OC Edition Graphics Card | PCIe 5.0, HDMI/DP 2.1, 3.6-slot, Military-grade Components, Protective PCB Coating, Axial-tech Fans

• Powered by the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture and DLSS 4. System Requirements: Minimum 850W PSU with 16-pin 12V-2x6 (12VHPWR) connector required. Verify before purchasing.
• Military-grade components deliver rock-solid power and longer lifespan for ultimate durability. Compatibility: 348mm (13.7") length, 3.6 slots, 4.3 lbs. Confirm case clearance and slot spacing. GPU bracket included.
• Protective PCB coating helps protect against short circuits caused by moisture, dust, or debris
• 3.6-slot design with massive fin array optimized for airflow from three Axial-tech fans
• Phase-change GPU thermal pad helps ensure optimal thermal performance and longevity, outlasting traditional thermal paste for graphics cards under heavy loads

$1,899.99

Buy on Amazon

Where the RTX 4090 pulls ahead most clearly

• Blender and GPU path tracing: Faster CUDA, RT cores, and OptiX acceleration can dramatically reduce final-frame render times.
• 3D animation and look development: Viewport previews, lighting iterations, and material changes feel more responsive in demanding scenes.
• AI-assisted creative tools: Newer Tensor cores improve workloads such as denoising, upscaling, generative effects, and some machine learning tasks.
• Video export and streaming: Dual AV1 encoders give the RTX 4090 a clear advantage for modern high-efficiency encoding.

Video editors also see practical gains, although the improvement varies more by application and codec. In DaVinci Resolve, Premiere Pro, and similar tools, the RTX 4090 can accelerate GPU-heavy effects, color grading, noise reduction, stabilization, AI masks, and high-resolution timelines more smoothly than the RTX 3090. The biggest media-engine difference is AV1 encoding support. The RTX 3090 can decode AV1 but does not include AV1 hardware encoding, while the RTX 4090 can encode AV1 with strong quality at lower bitrates. That matters for YouTube uploads, livestreaming, archival exports, and workflows where H.264 or HEVC file sizes are becoming a bottleneck.

For 3D artists, the upgrade is especially compelling when time is spent waiting on renders rather than simply fitting assets into VRAM. A user working with large architectural visualizations, product renders, simulation previews, or cinematic scenes can see hours saved across a project. However, creators already limited by the 24GB frame buffer will not solve that constraint by moving from an RTX 3090 to an RTX 4090. In those cases, a workstation GPU with more VRAM or a multi-GPU/render-farm approach may be more appropriate. For most independent creators and small studios, though, the RTX 4090 offers a large productivity jump over the RTX 3090 while preserving the same high-memory prosumer positioning.

Power Consumption, Thermals, and System Requirements

The RTX 4090 is dramatically faster than the RTX 3090, but its power profile is more nuanced than the headline numbers suggest. Both cards are rated at a 450W graphics power target in their reference-class configurations, so the RTX 4090 does not automatically require more power than the RTX 3090 on paper. In practice, the Ada Lovelace card delivers far more frames, faster renders, and higher ray tracing throughput within a similar board power envelope, making its performance per watt much stronger.

Under gaming loads, the RTX 4090 often draws between 350W and 450W depending on the title, resolution, frame cap, and ray tracing settings. The RTX 3090 commonly sits in the 320W to 420W range in demanding 4K games. The difference is that the RTX 4090 may be producing 60% to 90% more rasterized performance, and even larger gains in ray-traced workloads with DLSS 3 frame generation enabled. If both GPUs are capped to the same frame rate, such as 120 fps in a 4K game, the RTX 4090 can frequently run at lower utilization and better efficiency than the RTX 3090.

Power Supply and Connector Requirements

NVIDIA recommends an 850W power supply for the RTX 4090, while many RTX 3090 systems can run well on a quality 750W to 850W unit. The exact requirement depends heavily on the CPU. A system using a Core i9 or Ryzen 9 processor, mulle drives, pumps, RGB controllers, and heavy overclocking should be paired with a high-quality 1000W PSU for extra headroom, especially with an RTX 4090. For more typical gaming builds using a Ryzen 7 or Core i7-class CPU, a strong 850W ATX 3.0 unit is usually appropriate.

• RTX 4090: typically uses a 12VHPWR or 12V-2×6 power connector, often with an adapter on older power supplies.
• RTX 3090: commonly uses two or three 8-pin PCIe connectors, depending on the board partner model.
• Recommended PSU range: 850W for most RTX 4090 builds, 750W to 850W for many RTX 3090 builds.
• Best practice: use a native ATX 3.0/3.1 cable where possible and avoid sharply bending the RTX 4090 power cable near the connector.

Thermals also depend more on the specific cooler than the GPU name alone. Many RTX 4090 cards are physically huge, often occupying three to four slots with long heatsinks and large axial fans. This size helps them run surprisingly cool and quiet for a 450W-class flagship, with many models staying in the 60°C to low-70°C range during gaming if case airflow is strong. RTX 3090 cards can run hotter, particularly models where GDDR6X memory modules are placed on both sides of the PCB. Memory junction temperatures on some RTX 3090 cards can climb high during rendering, mining-style compute loads, or long video exports.

Case compatibility is one of the biggest practical differences. Before buying an RTX 4090, measure GPU clearance, side-panel clearance for the power cable, and available expansion slots. Many cards exceed 330mm in length and are thick enough to interfere with lower PCIe slots, front radiators, or compact mid-tower layouts. The RTX 3090 is also a large GPU, but more cases were designed around its dimensions during the Ampere generation. For small-form-factor systems, the RTX 3090 is already challenging, while the RTX 4090 usually requires a carefully selected case and power cable arrangement.

For users upgrading from an RTX 3090 to an RTX 4090, the system does not always need a full rebuild, but the supporting hardware should be checked. A modern high-wattage PSU, strong case airflow, enough physical clearance, and a CPU fast enough to feed the card at high refresh rates are the main requirements. At 4K, the RTX 4090 can stretch its legs even with many recent high-end CPUs, but at 1440p high refresh, older processors may limit the card before the GPU reaches full utilization.

Price, Availability, and Upgrade Recommendation

The RTX 4090 launched at a much higher official price than the RTX 3090 did, but real-world buying decisions depend heavily on street pricing. The RTX 3090 debuted at $1,499, while the RTX 4090 launched at $1,599. On paper, that $100 gap looks small for a card that can be dramatically faster, but availability, board partner premiums, and used-market pricing change the equation. New RTX 4090 models often sell well above entry-level pricing, especially premium triple-slot and liquid-cooled designs. The RTX 3090, meanwhile, is far more common on the second-hand market and can be found at steep discounts compared with its original launch price.

For gamers buying new, the RTX 4090 is the stronger long-term purchase if the budget allows. It is not just faster in raw rasterization; it also has access to DLSS 3 Frame Generation, much stronger ray tracing throughput, better efficiency per frame, and higher headroom for 4K high-refresh monitors. In demanding modern games, the RTX 4090 can feel like a different class of GPU, especially when paired with a fast CPU and a 120Hz, 144Hz, or 240Hz display. The RTX 3090 remains capable at 4K, but it is more likely to require reduced settings, DLSS Quality or Balanced mode, or lower ray tracing settings to keep frame rates consistently high.

For creators, the upgrade value depends on whether faster turnaround directly saves time or generates income. In GPU rendering, 3D viewport work, AI-assisted tools, and heavy effects pipelines, the RTX 4090 can cut render times substantially compared with the RTX 3090. That makes the premium easier to justify for Blender, Octane, Redshift, Unreal Engine, DaVinci Resolve, and similar workloads. Both cards include 24GB of VRAM, so the RTX 4090 does not increase memory capacity over the RTX 3090, but it uses that memory with far more compute performance behind it. If your projects already fit comfortably inside 24GB, the 4090’s speed advantage is the main draw.

If you already own an RTX 3090 and mostly play at 1440p or use moderate creative workloads, the RTX 4090 is a luxury upgrade rather than a necessity. The 3090 still has excellent VRAM capacity and enough performance for many professional and gaming tasks. If you are building a no-compromise 4K system from scratch, however, the RTX 4090 is clearly the better flagship. Its higher upfront cost buys a much larger performance jump than the small launch-price gap suggests, and it is the card that best shows NVIDIA’s generational leap from Ampere to Ada Lovelace.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much faster is the RTX 4090 than the RTX 3090 in real games?

At 4K, the RTX 4090 is commonly around 60% to 80% faster than the RTX 3090 in traditional rasterized gaming, depending on the title and CPU. In ray-traced games, the gap can be even larger, especially when DLSS 3 Frame Generation is available. At lower resolutions like 1440p, the difference may shrink if the CPU becomes the bottleneck.

Is the RTX 4090 worth upgrading to from an RTX 3090?

It is worth upgrading if you play at 4K with high refresh rates, use heavy ray tracing, or rely on GPU rendering, AI, and 3D workloads where time savings matter. If your RTX 3090 already handles your games or creative apps comfortably, the upgrade is harder to justify because the RTX 4090 is expensive and may require a stronger power supply or larger case. The biggest gains are for users who can fully use the extra performance rather than casual 1440p gaming.

Does the RTX 4090 use more power than the RTX 3090?

The RTX 4090 has a 450W rated board power, compared with 350W for the RTX 3090, so its peak power limit is higher. However, it is much more efficient, meaning it delivers substantially more performance per watt. In many games, you can reduce the power limit or undervolt the RTX 4090 and still outperform an RTX 3090 by a wide margin.

How big of a difference does DLSS 3 make compared with DLSS on the RTX 3090?

The RTX 3090 supports DLSS Super Resolution, but it does not support DLSS 3 Frame Generation. The RTX 4090 can generate additional frames in supported games, which can make high-refresh 4K gaming much smoother, especially with ray tracing enabled. This does not improve raw input latency by itself, so it works best when paired with NVIDIA Reflex and an already decent base frame rate.

Is the RTX 4090 better than the RTX 3090 for video editing, rendering, and 3D work?

Yes, the RTX 4090 is significantly faster in many creator workloads, including GPU rendering in Blender, Octane, Redshift, and similar tools. It also has newer Ada Lovelace hardware features, including improved ray tracing performance and AV1 encoding support, which is useful for modern video workflows and streaming. The RTX 3090 still has 24GB of VRAM like the RTX 4090, so it remains capable for large projects, but the 4090 usually completes demanding tasks much faster.

Bottom Line

The RTX 4090 is a huge leap over the RTX 3090, especially for 4K high-refresh gaming, ray tracing, DLSS 3-supported titles, 3D rendering, AI workloads, and demanding creator pipelines. It delivers far more performance per watt, though its high price, large size, and power requirements mean it is best suited to users who can actually use that extra horsepower.

If you already own an RTX 3090 and mainly play at 1440p or run lighter creative tasks, upgrading is not essential. But if you want the fastest consumer GPU available for 4K gaming, heavy production work, or future-facing features like Frame Generation, the RTX 4090 is the clear choice.

Quick Recap

Bestseller No. 1

VIPERA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition Graphic Card

16,384 NVIDIA CUDA Cores; Supports 4K 120Hz HDR, 8K 60Hz HDR and variable refresh rate as indicated in HDMI 2.1A

$4,649.99

Bestseller No. 2

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX™ 5080 16GB GDDR7 OC Edition Graphics Card | PCIe 5.0, HDMI/DP 2.1, 3.6-slot, Military-grade Components, Protective PCB Coating, Axial-tech Fans

3.6-slot design with massive fin array optimized for airflow from three Axial-tech fans; Auto-Extreme precision automated manufacturing helps ensure higher reliability

$1,899.99

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.