PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchThe Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is listed by Nothing at 825,564 in AnTuTu v10. Other published results differ: 91mobiles reports 809,554 in AnTuTu, while NanoReview reports 1,063,109 in AnTuTu 11. Those figures come from different sources and, in the latter case, a different benchmark version; they should not be treated as directly comparable scores or guaranteed results from every phone.
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro benchmark results at a glance
| Benchmark | Published result | Source and qualification |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu v10 | 825,564 | Nothing’s European product listing; the page identifies this as the Phone (3a) Pro figure. |
| AnTuTu | 809,554 | 91mobiles; its page does not specify the version alongside this overall result. |
| AnTuTu 11 | 1,063,109 | NanoReview; its page also shows a user-submitted 1,054,677 result dated 2026-09-15. |
| Geekbench 6, single-core / multi-core | 1,182 / 3,357 | NanoReview. |
| Geekbench, single-core / multi-core | 1,208 / 3,325 | 91mobiles; the page calls these Geekbench scores but does not establish the exact version. |
| Geekbench 6, single-core / multi-core | 1,166 / 3,275 | Tom’s Guide. |
| 3DMark Wild Life Original Unlimited | 4,192; 25.1 fps | Tom’s Guide; this is not Wild Life Extreme. |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,064 | 91mobiles. |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 388 | 91mobiles. |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 380; 98% stability | NanoReview; distinct from Steel Nomad. |
| PCMark 3.0 | 12,012 | NanoReview. |
| PCMark battery-performance test | 14 h 26 m | 91mobiles; a test duration, not a PCMark composite score. |
Why AnTuTu scores differ
The official 825,564 figure is specifically labeled AnTuTu v10 by Nothing. NanoReview’s 1,063,109 is labeled AnTuTu 11, a separate version, so the higher number does not by itself show that one result is better or that the phone’s performance changed. The 91mobiles page reports 809,554 but does not establish the version in the result summary. Its extracted breakdown also displays identical CPU and memory component values, so the overall score is more dependable to quote than those component figures unless the original test record is checked.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
NanoReview’s page provides a breakdown for its AnTuTu 11 result: CPU 412,882, GPU 181,358, memory 195,833, and UX 273,036. It also displays the separate user submission of 1,054,677 dated 2026-09-15, illustrating that reported scores can vary even within the same version.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Geekbench results: single-core and multi-core
Geekbench reports CPU performance in separate single-core and multi-core results; keep the version attached when comparing numbers. NanoReview and Tom’s Guide both label their results Geekbench 6, while 91mobiles identifies its results only as Geekbench. The scores are close across these publications, but the available pages do not establish identical test conditions or firmware.
#1 Best Overall
- Ultra-high Performance Chipset: This cell phone is equipped with a powerful and efficient Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chip, using 4nm technology and a full-core 3.2GHz CPU, supporting 24GB LPDDR5X memory + UFS 4.0 flash memory, and equipped with an AI engine, with comprehensive performance upgrades.
- Revolutionary 50MP Quad Camera System: This smartphone is equipped with All 50MP four camera system: Including a Main Camera, a Periscope, an Ultra-wide Camera, and a ultra-clear Front Camera; this cell phone support Ultra XDR 4K video, Auto Tone, Portrait Optimiser, Motion Capture Mode, Night Mode; Whether you're a photographer, vlogger, or social media enthusiast, with the pro-grade camera system and AI enhancements, this Nothing phone can ensure every shot is masterpiece-ready.
- One-Touch Control, AI-Powered Organization：ESSENTIAL KEY: A new button on the side of your device.Press once to capture your screen, long-press to record voice and ideas, and double-press to access Essential Space; ESSENTIAL SPACE: Everything in one place, organised the way you want it to be，AI mobile phones helps organise your captures, generating suggestions, and staying on top of what matters; Explore more AI features, Let AI enrich your life
- GLYPH INTERFACE: Where Light Speaks; The Glyph Matrix transforms your phone into an interactive playground—smart animations turn notifications, tools, and games into living light experiences; NFC: An animation comes to life when NFC is triggered; Glyph Button: Quick-tap to browse Glyph Toys, long-press to launch—from utilities to games; Smarter Alerts: Notifications now speak in light and sound, blending visuals with meaning; Beyond illumination; This is interaction, redefined.
- Larger and Brighter FHD Display: 6.67" FHD+ 1.5K AMOLED flex screen with 1.07B colors & 120Hz adaptive refresh for ultra-smooth visuals; Vs Nothing Phone (2)/(3a): Phone (3) boasts 181.2% brighter (4500 nits), 16.7% sharper (460 PPI), and 316% faster touch response (1000Hz); IP68-rated—tough enough for any adventure.
- NanoReview: Geekbench 6, 1,182 single-core and 3,357 multi-core.
- Tom’s Guide: Geekbench 6, 1,166 single-core and 3,275 multi-core.
- 91mobiles: Geekbench, 1,208 single-core and 3,325 multi-core; exact sub-version is not stated.
3DMark results are workload-specific
3DMark scores should be compared only when the test name and workload match. Wild Life Original Unlimited, Wild Life Extreme, Steel Nomad, and Steel Nomad Light are not interchangeable tests.
- Tom’s Guide reports 4,192 and 25.1 fps in 3DMark Wild Life Original Unlimited.
- 91mobiles reports 1,064 in Wild Life Extreme and 388 in Steel Nomad.
- NanoReview reports 380 in Steel Nomad Light, with 98% stability.
PCMark score versus battery runtime
NanoReview lists a PCMark 3.0 composite score of 12,012. Its page also reports category scores of 11,321 for web, 6,246 for video editing, 20,223 for photo editing, 10,284 for data manipulation, and 16,850 for writing. Separately, 91mobiles reports 14 hours 26 minutes in a PCMark battery-performance test. That duration is a runtime result, not another score on the same scale as PCMark 3.0.
Rank #2
- [Compatibility] Designed for Nothing Phone 3a / 3a Pro. Designed with thoughtful 2.5D curved edges, compatible with most phone cases. Please kindly check your device model before purchasing
- [Effortless Installation] Comes with an easy installation tool. Allow you to align perfectly and install the screen protector quickly without leaving any air bubbles
- [Anti-Scratch] Built with 9H hardness tempered glass, highly protect the screen against daily scratches, abrasions or other impact caused by accidental drops and bumps
- [Ultra-Clear & Sensitive] Featuring high light transmittance, the screen protector keeps the original quality of photos and videos. Ensure enjoyable viewing and responsive touching experiences as using your bare screen
- [Fingerprint & Oil-Proof] The hydrophobic and oleophobic coating prevents fingerprints, oil residue and sweat from gathering on the screen. Always maintain a clean screen environment for you
What the results suggest in everyday use
Nothing identifies the Phone (3a) Pro as using a Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 processor, with a listed maximum frequency of up to 2.5 GHz and an Adreno 810 GPU at 1.05 GHz; its European product page also publishes the AnTuTu v10 score. Benchmark results can help distinguish CPU, graphics, and mixed-workload performance, but they do not guarantee a particular experience on every device.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsTom’s Guide says its tested Geekbench and 3DMark results were below those of its named flagship comparators. The reviewer reported not noticing the difference for basic email, video, and web use, while games felt less smooth than on flagship phones in the titles tested. That is one reviewer’s assessment of its tested use, not a promise about every game or owner.
Quick Recap
How to compare these results fairly
- Match benchmark version and exact workload, not just the benchmark family name.
- Keep single-core, multi-core, graphics scores, composite productivity scores, and battery-test durations in their own categories.
- Look for consistent firmware, temperature, performance mode, and laboratory conditions. The cited pages do not establish that all tests used identical conditions.
- Treat published scores as results from particular tests, not guaranteed scores for every retail unit.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
