To compare MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (Nasdaq: MFIC) with other business development companies, line up the same measures for the same reporting dates: dividend coverage, net asset value (NAV), market price relative to NAV, credit quality, portfolio mix, leverage and funding, and management fees. MFIC’s reported figures offer useful reference points, but they do not establish a current dividend yield, a current discount or premium to NAV, or which BDC is the better investment. A high yield by itself cannot show whether distributions are supported by recurring income or whether NAV is holding up.
What MFIC is—and what a comparison can tell you
MFIC is an externally managed, publicly traded business development company (BDC) whose stated objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation. Apollo-affiliated Apollo Investment Management, L.P. is its adviser, and MidCap Financial is the primary source of its senior secured loans. These are issuer descriptions, not an independent judgment about management quality.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
A BDC’s shareholder return depends on more than its distribution rate. Investment income, borrower credit performance, financing costs, expenses, portfolio valuations and the market price of the shares all matter. Compare MFIC with other BDCs using their filings and market data for a common date, and verify that each company defines its measures the same way.
Start with the income supporting the distribution
Net investment income (NII) measures investment income after operating expenses and interest expense, but before realized and unrealized gains or losses. It is useful when assessing distribution coverage; GAAP net income includes those gains and losses and therefore answers a different question.
#1 Best Overall
For the year ended December 31, 2025, MFIC reported NII of $1.52 per share and total distributions of $1.52 per share—1.00 times coverage for that year. It also reported GAAP net income of $0.68 per share, with the annual report attributing the difference from NII to realized and unrealized losses. One year of NII matching distributions does not establish that the rate is sustainable in future periods.
The distribution rate changed in 2026: MFIC paid $0.38 per share quarterly in 2025, and its board reduced the quarterly rate to $0.31 beginning in 2026, citing declining base rates and other factors. Do not annualize the old rate as though it were still declared. For the quarter ended June 30, 2026, MFIC reported $32.769 million of NII and $25.536 million of stockholder distributions, about 1.28 times coverage using those reported aggregate dollar amounts. A single quarter is not a forecast or proof of ongoing coverage.
For each peer, compare NII per share with distributions per share over several quarters, and identify supplemental or special distributions separately from the recurring rate. Check whether the company is counting undistributed income or other adjustments in its own coverage presentation. A yield uses a share price as well as a distribution rate, so it changes with the date and market price; it is not a substitute for coverage.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsTrack NAV and compare it with the share price
NAV per share is the value of a BDC’s assets minus liabilities, divided by common shares outstanding. It is an accounting estimate, not a guaranteed sale value. The market price may trade above or below it.
Rank #2
- Comes with secure packaging
- Easy to read text
- It can be a gift option
MFIC reported NAV of $14.18 per share at December 31, 2025, and $13.37 at June 30, 2026. That is a decrease of about 5.7% between those reporting dates; it does not, by itself, measure shareholder total return, which also includes distributions and market-price movements. To assess total return, use a defined period and include both share-price change and distributions.
For each company, compare the NAV trend across several reporting periods, then calculate its premium or discount to NAV using the share price and NAV from the same date:
Premium or discount to NAV (%) = (share price ÷ NAV per share − 1) × 100
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
A positive result is a premium; a negative result is a discount. The evidence here does not establish MFIC’s current share price or current premium or discount, so neither should be inferred from its NAV alone. Also review realized and unrealized losses: a distribution can remain high while NAV declines.
Assess credit quality, not just stated yield
Non-accruals and payment-in-kind (PIK) income can reveal risks that a headline yield may obscure. A loan on non-accrual status generally is no longer accruing interest as ordinary income; PIK income is interest added to a loan balance rather than paid in cash at that time. Definitions and treatment can vary, so check each BDC’s filing.
MFIC reported that non-accrual investments were 2.61% of portfolio fair value at December 31, 2025, and that PIK income represented 5.6% of total investment income for 2025. Compare both with peers at matching dates and on matching bases—especially non-accruals at cost versus fair value. Also review risk-rating changes, restructurings and realized losses where reported. No single one of these measures establishes a company’s future credit performance.
Compare portfolio construction using the right denominator
MFIC reported the following characteristics for its direct-origination portfolio at December 31, 2025. These percentages do not describe the whole portfolio unless explicitly stated.
| Direct-origination portfolio measure | MFIC reported figure | How to interpret it in a peer comparison |
|---|---|---|
| First-lien debt | 99% | Compare with the same first-lien definition and portfolio denominator. |
| Floating-rate investments | 100% | Compare the rate structure and consider borrower sensitivity to changing rates. |
| Sponsored investments | 92% | Use the peer’s stated definition of sponsored investment. |
| Investments with financial covenants, at cost | 94% | Check how covenants are defined and whether the measure is based on cost or fair value. |
| Average exposure | $12.8 million | Compare exposure measures calculated on the same basis. |
| Median borrower EBITDA | $50 million | Check whether peers report median or average borrower size. |
| Weighted-average borrower net leverage | 5.29x | Compare leverage definitions and weighting methods. |
| Weighted-average interest coverage | 2.3x | Check the income and interest-expense definitions used. |
MFIC’s overall portfolio at December 31, 2025 had fair value of $3.17 billion and included 247 companies across 46 industries. Keep those whole-portfolio totals separate from the direct-origination percentages above. When comparing diversification, look at borrower and industry concentration as well as the number of companies; a count alone does not show how much value is concentrated in the largest positions.
Rank #4
A high first-lien share describes loan priority, not an absence of default or loss risk. Floating-rate loans may generate more income when reference rates rise, but higher borrowing costs can also burden borrowers and increase credit risk. Consider loan seniority, covenants, concentration and borrower leverage together rather than treating one portfolio statistic as a verdict.
Put leverage and funding on the same basis
Leverage can magnify gains and losses. Compare debt-to-equity or asset-coverage measures only after checking definitions and reporting dates. Also examine the mix of secured and unsecured borrowings, maturities, borrowing costs, unused commitments and refinancing needs. Those details affect both resilience and the income left after financing expenses.
MFIC’s Form 10-Q reported approximately $2.861 billion of total assets, $2.770 billion of investments at fair value, $1.740 billion of debt and $1.101 billion of net assets at June 30, 2026. Its filing stated that 82,372,628 common shares were outstanding as of August 5, 2026. These figures describe MFIC at the stated dates; a valid peer comparison requires equivalent figures and consistently defined leverage measures from each peer’s filings.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Compare adviser fees and governance terms
External management means shareholders should examine how compensation is calculated, not just the headline fee rate. Compare the base management fee and its fee base, incentive-fee hurdle and catch-up, any fee cap or lookback, waivers, administrative expenses and affiliate transactions. Two BDCs with similar gross portfolio income can deliver different net results if fees and expenses differ.
Best Value
MFIC is externally managed, but the figures cited here do not establish a same-period fee comparison with other BDCs. Do not label its fee structure low or high without calculating comparable terms from peer filings. Management’s statements about intended dividend coverage are commitments, not independent assurances of future results.
A practical same-date comparison
Use this framework to build a side-by-side comparison from each BDC’s filings and market data. The MFIC reference figures above are issuer-reported and date-specific; peer values are not stated here.
| Comparison area | Put side by side | MFIC reference or required check |
|---|---|---|
| Income and distributions | NII per share, distributions per share, coverage over several quarters, and supplemental or special distributions | 2025 NII and distributions were each $1.52 per share; the quarterly rate changed from $0.38 in 2025 to $0.31 beginning in 2026. |
| NAV and valuation | NAV per share trend, same-date share price, premium or discount, realized and unrealized losses | NAV was $14.18 at December 31, 2025 and $13.37 at June 30, 2026; same-date share-price data is required to calculate valuation. |
| Credit quality | Non-accruals at cost and fair value, rating migration, restructurings, realized losses, PIK share of income | At year-end 2025, non-accruals were 2.61% of portfolio fair value; PIK was 5.6% of 2025 investment income. |
| Portfolio construction | First-lien share, floating-rate share, borrower and industry concentration, company count, origination mix, covenant measures | The 99% first-lien and 100% floating-rate figures apply to MFIC’s direct-origination portfolio at December 31, 2025, not automatically to its full portfolio. |
| Leverage and funding | Consistently defined leverage or asset coverage, secured and unsecured funding, maturities, borrowing costs, unused commitments | Use each company’s filings for the same period and check definitions before comparing. |
| Fees and governance | Base fee and fee base, incentive terms, caps or lookbacks, waivers, expenses, affiliate transactions | MFIC is externally managed; a relative fee assessment requires same-period peer terms. |
Record the reporting date and definition alongside every figure. If a peer reports a percentage for its whole portfolio while MFIC’s figure covers only direct-originated investments, the figures are not directly comparable. Likewise, do not compare a declared quarterly distribution for one BDC with an annualized market yield for another without aligning the dates and calculation method.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
