Five states—Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka—are reported to form a non-rotating core of a proposed new GST Council Standing Committee. The reported plan also includes seven other state positions that would rotate every two years. The arrangement has not been confirmed by an official decision record, and another report describes all committee membership as rotating, so “permanent seats” should not be treated as settled policy.
Which states are named in the proposal?
BusinessToday’s October 6, 2026 report names Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka as the proposed non-rotating core. It says the committee would have 12 state representatives in total, with seven additional positions rotating on a two-year cycle. These are reported proposal details, not a confirmed final roster.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
For the first two-year cycle, the report groups the additional states as follows:
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minute- Rajasthan and West Bengal
- Kerala and Punjab
- Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Meghalaya
The report does not establish a complete, officially approved membership list.
#1 Best Overall
Why is the word “permanent” uncertain?
The reports differ on whether any states would retain seats. BusinessToday describes five non-rotating core states alongside seven rotating positions. An October 5, 2026 Economic Times BFSI report instead says membership would be based on state size and rotate every two years, with no permanent state seats. The available reports do not establish whether this reflects different interpretations of the same proposal or a substantive disagreement about its design.
No official 2026 Council decision, government order or full proposal confirming adoption or implementation was identified. The careful description is therefore “reported proposal for non-rotating core representation,” rather than a definitive announcement of permanent seats.
How would states be selected?
According to the October 6 report, the proposed groupings draw on two measures of each state’s relative size in the GST system:
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →- Post-settlement gross State GST (SGST) revenue for financial year 2025–26.
- Registered GSTIN counts as of March 31, 2026.
The report does not publish the individual values or explain how the two indicators would be weighted. It is not possible from the reported information to calculate a state ranking or infer how a particular seat was allocated.
What would the committee do?
The reported remit is to examine proposals involving changes to GST laws, rules, notifications and forms; consider ways to simplify procedures; and review representations from trade and industry. These responsibilities are described as elements of the proposal, not confirmed operating procedures.
The reports also describe a proposed GST Council Secretariat process for receiving, screening, categorising and tracking representations. Similar submissions could be aggregated, with issues judged to have broader policy or systemic importance prioritised for referral to the appropriate committee. The available accounts do not confirm that this process is operating.
Rank #4
How does this relate to earlier GST committees?
The GST Council’s record of its 14th meeting provides historical context: it proposed eight standing committees for different aspects of the GST project. Each was to have two convenors—one from the Centre and one from a state—and identify action steps, a blueprint and timelines. That earlier record does not confirm the reported 2026 restructuring or its membership.
Quick Recap
What is confirmed—and what remains open?
| Question | What the reports say | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Committee size | 12 state representatives, according to BusinessToday’s October 6 report | Reported proposal; no official 2026 decision record identified |
| Five core states | Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka | Described as non-rotating by BusinessToday; permanence is disputed by the Economic Times BFSI account |
| Other positions | Seven positions said to rotate every two years; first-cycle groupings include Rajasthan, West Bengal, Kerala, Punjab, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Meghalaya | Reported proposal, not confirmed final roster |
| Selection measures | FY2025–26 post-settlement gross SGST revenue and GSTIN counts as of March 31, 2026 | Weights and state-level values not stated in the reports |
| Remit and Secretariat process | Review proposed GST changes, simplify procedures, consider representations, and screen and route issues | Reported proposed functions, not confirmed operating procedures |
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
