In the cited benchmark comparison, the Exynos 2400e leads the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in multi-core CPU results and the listed graphics tests; their Geekbench 6 single-core scores are close. Those figures suggest a benchmark advantage for the Exynos in those workloads, not a guaranteed advantage in every phone or game. The results come from aggregated samples rather than a controlled test of both chips in otherwise identical phones.
How the specifications compare
NanoReview lists both chips as 4 nm processors. The Exynos 2400e has 10 CPU cores and Samsung’s Xclipse 940 GPU; the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 has eight CPU cores and Qualcomm’s Adreno 740 GPU. Notebookcheck describes the Xclipse 940 as based on AMD RDNA 3.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
| Specification | Exynos 2400e | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU configuration | 1 Cortex-X4 at 3.11 GHz; 2 Cortex-A720 at 2.9 GHz; 3 Cortex-A720 at 2.6 GHz; 4 Cortex-A520 at 1.95 GHz | 1 Cortex-X3 at 3.2 GHz; 2 Cortex-A715 and 2 Cortex-A710 at 2.8 GHz; 3 Cortex-A510 at 2.0 GHz |
| CPU core count | 10 | 8 |
| Manufacturing process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Adreno 740 |
These are the specifications listed by NanoReview; the Xclipse architecture description is from Notebookcheck. The Exynos has more cores and a newer listed prime-core generation, while the Snapdragon has the higher listed peak CPU clock. Neither core count nor peak frequency alone predicts performance: results depend on how a workload uses the cores, as well as the phone’s power and thermal limits.
Recommended Free Tools
What the benchmark numbers show
The following scores are those displayed on NanoReview’s comparison page, not results independently measured in a controlled, same-phone test.
#1 Best Overall
- Unmatched Performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and 12GB RAM Experience blazing-fast speed and efficiency with the 17PROMA X, powered by the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor. Compared to other phones using older chips, this device delivers up faster performance for gaming, multitasking, and app loading. With 12GB of RAM and 512GB storage, you can run multiple apps seamlessly without lag, while competitors often offer only 8-12GB RAM. The enhanced operating system in Android 15 optimizes resource management, ensuring smoother operations and longer device lifespan. This combination outperforms rivals in benchmarks and real-world use, making it ideal for power users and professionals.
- Massive 7000mAh Battery for Extended Usage The 17PROMA X features a robust 7000mAh battery that far surpasses typical phones with 4000-5000mAh capacities. Enjoy up to 2 days of heavy use on a single charge, including streaming, gaming, and browsing, while competitors require frequent recharging. Advanced power-saving modes in Android 15 extend battery life by optimizing background apps and display settings. Compared to other devices, our battery maintains consistent performance over time, reducing degradation. This makes the phone perfect for travelers and busy individuals who need reliable, all-day power without compromises.
- Immersive 6.99-inch Display with Superior Visuals Dive into a vibrant viewing experience with the 17PROMA X's 6.99-inch screen, which outperforms many competitors' smaller displays. With high resolution and excellent color accuracy, this large screen is ideal for movies, games, and work, offering more real estate than standard 6.5-inch models. The display is optimized for Android 15, providing smoother scrolling and better touch response. Compared to other phones, it reduces eye strain with adaptive brightness and blue light filters. This combination of size and clarity gives you an edge in entertainment and productivity, making every interaction more engaging.
- Advanced 68MP+108MP Camera System for Pro-Level Photos Capture stunning details with the dual 68MP and 108MP cameras on the 17PROMA X, a setup that exceeds many phones with lower megapixel counts. Compared to competitors' 48-64MP cameras, our system offers superior low-light performance, sharper images, and 4K video recording enhanced by Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processing. Android 15's software improvements enable features like AI scene detection and portrait mode, delivering professional results effortlessly. This camera outperforms in versatility and quality, perfect for photography enthusiasts who want crisp, vibrant shots without extra gear.
- Future-Ready with Android 15, 5G, and Dual SIM Stay ahead with the 17PROMA X running the latest Android 15 OS, which provides better security, customization, and updates than older versions used by competitors. Enjoy seamless 5G connectivity for faster downloads and streaming, along with Dual SIM support for managing personal and work lines. Compared to other phones, our operating system is optimized for efficiency, reducing bloatware and improving battery life. This combination ensures a smooth, reliable experience that highlights the phone's advantages in speed and functionality, making it a top choice for modern users.
| Benchmark | Exynos 2400e | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | What to take from it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,045 | 2,004 | Close listed scores |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 6,397 | 5,311 | Exynos leads in this aggregated comparison |
| AnTuTu 11 total | 1,977,269 | 1,757,044 | Exynos has the higher listed total; component subscores do not all rank the chips identically |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 1,769; 70% listed stability | 1,092; 67% listed stability | Exynos leads in this graphics test; stability is the value reported on the comparison page |
| 3DMark Solar Bay | 7,699; 29 FPS listed | 5,312; 20 FPS listed | Exynos leads in this test’s score and listed frame rate |
Aggregate results have uneven sample counts. For AnTuTu 11, NanoReview lists 56 Exynos samples and 238 Snapdragon samples; for Geekbench 6 CPU, it lists 24 and 132 respectively. Different phones, cooling systems, software versions, and benchmark conditions may contribute to those pools. NanoReview also notes that game frame rates can vary with the game version, operating system, and other factors. The table is useful for seeing a broad pattern, but it cannot establish a precise performance gap for a particular handset.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What that means for different tasks
Everyday responsiveness and short CPU tasks
The listed Geekbench 6 single-core results differ by only 41 points, with the Exynos ahead. That is a small separation in this comparison, not proof that a user will notice a speed difference in ordinary apps. App launch time and responsiveness also reflect storage, software, memory management, and the phone’s tuning.
Work that uses several CPU cores
The Exynos 2400e’s higher listed Geekbench 6 multi-core score points to an advantage in that test’s multi-threaded workload. It is the clearer CPU gap in the displayed figures. It should not be treated as a universal result for every sustained task, because the comparison aggregates results from different devices.
Graphics and games
The Exynos scores higher in the cited Steel Nomad Light and Solar Bay comparisons. These synthetic graphics tests indicate how the sampled devices performed in those particular workloads. They do not guarantee higher frame rates, better image quality, or smoother play in every game. Game versions, graphics settings, software support, and thermal behavior all matter.
Why phone model matters as much as the chip name
Samsung identifies the Galaxy S24 FE as an Exynos 2400e phone. Its announcement lists 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB, 256 GB, and 512 GB storage options, with availability varying by carrier, country, or region. Samsung Canada also lists Exynos 2400e for its Galaxy S24 FE variant.
That gives the Exynos side a concrete phone reference, but the Snapdragon scores in an aggregated comparison may come from multiple phones with different cooling and power settings. Notebookcheck’s benchmark page includes results from a Galaxy S24 FE with 8 GB of RAM; those are results for that device, not a result that applies to every Exynos 2400e phone. A Geekbench Browser entry separately identifies an S24 FE test using Samsung s5e9945, with a 10-core layout and cluster frequencies of 1.96, 2.59, 2.90, and 3.11 GHz.
How to use the comparison when choosing a phone
- Compare exact handset models. Check the phone’s cooling design, memory configuration, software version, and regional chipset variant rather than assuming every model bearing a processor name performs alike.
- Match the evidence to your workload. Multi-core scores are relevant to heavily threaded tasks; graphics tests are clues about graphics performance, not substitutes for tests of the games you play.
- Look for comparable device-level results. The most useful head-to-head evidence tests the exact phones under the same workload and conditions. The cited aggregate comparison does not isolate chipset performance from handset design.
- Judge battery life and sustained speed from phone tests. The cited figures do not establish a universal winner for battery life, thermals, long gaming sessions, or day-to-day responsiveness.
Notebookcheck characterizes Exynos 2400e CPU performance in its benchmark set as comparable to Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. That device-focused context is a useful reminder that benchmark conclusions can vary with the tested handset and methodology.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
