Side by side
Crismo vs Flowable
Both stand on process mapping software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb
Visit Crismo Free plan Open source AndroidAPIiPhone+3
Choose Flowable if your case and process work needs standards-based engines, AI-agent controls, or Java deployment options. Flowable Design and the core engines provide free entry points, and the Agentic Case Platform has a 30-day free-access offer. Its deployment model is best suited to teams able to run Java applications or services.
Visit FlowableThe facts
| Crismo | Flowable | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted, Web | Android, API, iPhone, Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Flowable Platform: $99 per user a month |
| Plans published | 5 | 5 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | crismo.io | flowable.com |
| On process mapping software | #7 of 27 | #3 of 27 |
Crismo: what it does well
Flowable: what it does well
- Engines support BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards.
- Apache 2.0 licensed engines are written in Java.
- AI controls include runtime guardrails and inspection.
- Connectors directory lists 30 integrations.
- Cloud offers dedicated and shared environments.
What to know first
- The Agentic Case Platform free-access offer lasts 30 days.
- Engines run embedded in Java applications or as server, cluster, or cloud services.
Alternatives to Crismo Alternatives to Flowable The whole list