Side by side
AI Code Reviewer vs Cubic
Both stand on ai code review tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Open source LinuxSelf-hosted
AI Code Reviewer offers configurable automated review comments for GitHub, with several model choices and self-hosting options. Teams should account for its file and comment caps, as well as the restriction on public-fork reviews.
Visit AI Code Reviewer
Free plan APILinuxMac+2
Cubic combines pull request reviews, codebase scanning, and team-specific review context for GitHub repositories. Check its host support and reviewed-line allowances against your team's needs before choosing a plan.
Visit CubicThe facts
| AI Code Reviewer | Cubic | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted | API, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Team: $30 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 10 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | cubic.dev |
| On ai code review tools | #1 of 47 | #4 of 47 |
AI Code Reviewer: what it does well
- Runs as a GitHub Action without a server
- Supports four model-provider options
- Custom Markdown rules for house conventions
- Does not check out or run pull-request code
- Free and MIT-licensed
What to know first
- Skips changes involving more than 50 files by default
- Caps inline comments at 20 per pull request
- Skips public-repository fork pull requests
Cubic: what it does well
- Checks changes against the full codebase and team rules.
- Can score merge confidence from 1 to 5.
- Supports seven listed programming languages.
- Reviews run in isolated containers.
What to know first
- GitHub Enterprise Server is not supported.
- GitLab and Bitbucket are not supported.
- Free plan covers public repositories only.
- Reviews over 200 eligible files select up to 200.
Alternatives to AI Code Reviewer Alternatives to Cubic The whole list