Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Possibly on particular tasks, but there is no established way to make everyone think faster across everyday life. Processing speed is assessed with specific tests, and improvement on a practiced task does not automatically transfer to untrained activities. Regular physical activity and adequate sleep support broader cognitive health; structured speed-of-processing training may improve trained abilities. Evidence for a general, durable increase in everyday processing speed is less certain.
What “processing speed” means—and what a faster test score proves
Processing speed is a cognitive domain assessed through particular tasks, such as tests of how quickly someone handles information or responds. It is not interchangeable with memory, attention, executive function, or general cognition. A study that reports improvement in one of those other domains has not necessarily shown that participants’ processing speed increased.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
It also matters whether an improvement appears on the task someone practiced, on a similar test, or in untrained activities. Better performance on a practiced test can be useful, but it does not by itself show that a person will think faster in daily life. Across the evidence reviewed here, no single widely accepted estimate describes how much adults generally can increase processing speed.
Which strategies have evidence?
Physical activity: worthwhile for health, but not a guaranteed speed boost
A 2025 umbrella review combined 133 systematic reviews covering 2,724 randomized controlled trials and 258,279 participants. Across populations and exercise types, it reported pooled improvements in general cognition (standardized mean difference, or SMD, 0.42), memory (SMD 0.26), and executive function (SMD 0.24). Those are broad cognitive-domain results, not proof of a consistent effect on processing speed. Read the BMJ Open review.
#1 Best Overall
- 399 Games Puzzles Trivia Challenges Specially Designed to Keep Your Brain Young By Linde Nancy
Processing-speed-specific findings are more mixed. A 2022 review of exercise studies in cognitively unimpaired adults aged 45–65 identified 13 eligible studies. Single-session studies found no significant changes on processing-speed measures; results from multi-session interventions varied. Different tests and interventions also made the evidence difficult to combine. See the middle-age review.
In a different population—people with cognitive decline—a 2023 meta-analysis pooled processing-speed results from four studies with 198 participants. The change was not statistically significant (g = −0.445; 95% confidence interval −0.929 to 0.040; p = 0.072), and the studies had substantial heterogeneity (I² = 64.11%). This small, varied evidence pool does not establish that exercise has no effect; it does not support a confident, general processing-speed claim either. Read the meta-analysis.
A 2018 review of moderate exercise in healthy adults found only three eligible studies. It reported improvements in some measures, including simple reaction time, response precision, and working memory, but noted moderate methodological quality and risk of bias. The results support cautious interest, not a precise exercise prescription for speeding up processing. See the review.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Regular physical activity remains a reasonable health behavior, scaled to a person’s abilities and circumstances. This evidence does not identify a single optimal routine for increasing processing speed, or establish that exercise equipment is required.
Speed-of-processing training: expect the clearest effects on trained or similar tasks
Structured cognitive training is more specific than the broad promise of “brain games.” A review of behavioral interventions in healthy older adults found that process- and strategy-based training commonly improved trained domains, while transfer to untrained domains was weak or inconsistent; relatively few studies assessed everyday function. Read the review.
The 2015 IHAMS randomized trial assigned 681 adults, aged 50–64 or 65 and older, to speed-of-processing training conditions or an active crossword-puzzle control. At one year, 587 participants had complete data. Assignment to 10–14 hours of training did not significantly improve the trial’s composite cognitive measure compared with the control (time-by-treatment p = 0.331). Because the outcome was a composite, this result is not proof that nobody can improve at a practiced task; it is a reason not to promise broad cognitive transfer. See the IHAMS trial.
Rank #3
- 60, 000+ POSSIBILITIES IN THE BOX: STEM puzzle game with the combination of dice, location of the blockers, and set of color shapes, there are 62, 208 POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS in the 6X6 grid! Think about it… what is the possibility you will beat your opponent?
- GAME OF THE YEAR: Product Of the Year / Educational Product Of the Year / Top Toy Award Winners! Well-made table game that includes 2 grids, 7 dice, 2 sets of 7 blockers, and 2 sets of 9 colored shapes. Easy to travel with, easy to teach and learn, and simply enjoy the time! This puzzle game is SIMPLY GENIUS!
- EASY TO LEARN, BE FAST TO WIN: Promotes problem solving and motor manipulation skill training. Roll the seven dice together and place a blocker in each of the co-ordinates that appear on the faces. Now. . . RACE to fill every other space on the grid! Speed up your brain and hands! Who'll win?!
- SHARE THE JOY WITH SOMEONE, OR ENJOY ALONE: You can rack your brains against friends and family to see who fill out all the spaces first! Or you can challenge yourself against the clock! Either way… be the GENIUS one!
- FIND THAT ONE SOLUTION…OR MORE THAN ONE?: This board game is confirmed that all of arrangements have AT LEAST one possible solution for each, and maybe even more! Some are very easy, and some are much harder. Find a solution first, then challenge yourself to find another one… and… another one?
A separate long-term follow-up of the ACTIVE trial adds a distinct finding, with a different outcome. Participants aged 65 and older originally received memory, reasoning, or visual speed-of-processing training in 60–75-minute sessions twice weekly for five to six weeks in 1999; some were assigned booster sessions. In a 2026 news release, the National Institutes of Health reported that only the visual speed-of-processing training arm was associated with a 25% lower rate of later dementia diagnosis in Medicare claims data. This is an association in a defined trial cohort, not a repeated measure showing faster everyday processing over the follow-up, and it does not establish that arbitrary commercial games delay dementia. NIH described the finding as promising and said further research is needed. Read the NIH release.
If you choose training, look for a structured program that explicitly targets speed of processing, and judge it by what it measures. A program’s gains on its own exercises are not evidence that it improves untrained abilities or everyday functioning. An app, puzzle book, or subscription should not be assumed equivalent to the specific interventions studied.
Sleep: support for cognition, not direct proof of faster processing
A 2024 randomized crossover study followed 65 healthy adults (mean age 35.9; 89% women) through six-week conditions of habitual adequate sleep and sleep reduced by 1.5 hours, separated by a washout. Stable habitual sleep of at least seven hours a night was associated with improvement beyond practice effects on a working-memory test; a similar pattern appeared on a test of inhibitory control and attention. These were not direct processing-speed outcomes, so the study supports adequate, consistent sleep as a basis for cognition rather than proving that sleep makes processing speed faster. Read the sleep study.
The study does not establish that a sleep tracker, supplement, or sleep aid increases processing speed.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to judge a claim that promises faster thinking
Before treating a program or lifestyle change as a proven way to increase processing speed, check what the evidence actually measured:
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
- Outcome: Was it processing speed, or another domain such as memory, attention, working memory, executive function, or global cognition?
- Transfer: Did participants improve only on a practiced exercise, on a similar test, on untrained tests, or in everyday functioning?
- Study and duration: Was the result from a single session, a multiweek intervention, a controlled trial, or a review? Was the outcome an immediate test score or a later diagnosis?
- Participants: Were they healthy middle-aged adults, healthy older adults, or people with cognitive impairment? Findings in one group do not automatically apply to another.
- Strength and limits: Consider sample size, confidence intervals, statistical significance, variation between studies, the comparison group, and whether the reported result is an association or a demonstrated test-score change.
Be especially cautious when marketing turns improvement in a related cognitive skill into a promise of faster thinking in general. The evidence discussed here does not establish a supplement, device, workbook, or consumer app as a reliable way to raise processing speed.
When to seek an assessment
If cognitive slowing is new, worsening, or disrupting daily functioning, a lifestyle article cannot determine its cause. Consider seeking an appropriate clinical assessment rather than relying on self-diagnosis or trying to solve the change with a brain-training product.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
