OWASP Threat Dragon

Overview

Threat Dragon connects system diagrams to lists of threats associated with their elements, making it a practical way to include threat modeling in a secure development lifecycle. It covers familiar diagram components—processes, data stores, actors, data flows and trust boundaries—and supports several threat-category frameworks. That breadth makes it adaptable across modeling approaches, though the rule engine’s suggestions are a starting point for analysis rather than a substitute for the team’s judgment.

Deployment choice is a notable strength: teams can use the desktop application or run a containerized, self-hosted web application. The project also describes security practices including signed commits, security scans on every commit, and signed and notarized desktop releases where possible. Analytics are disabled by default, require server configuration, and Plausible does not collect threat-model content or usernames.

Key features

A rule engine suggests threats and mitigations, with context-specific suggestions informed by diagram element properties. This can help teams turn a system map into a more focused review. Threat categories include STRIDE, LINDDUN, CIA, CIA-DIE, DIE and PLOT4ai; risk prioritization, templates and multiple modeling methods add structure for teams with different analysis practices.

The web app supports local file storage and configurable access to GitHub, GitHub Enterprise, Google Drive, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Enterprise and GitLab. The desktop app saves models locally. This gives teams several storage paths, but the web integrations depend on configuration rather than being presented as a single uniform storage setup.

Pricing

Threat Dragon is free: the Free plan costs 0.00 USD per free, is billed Free, and is open source. No paid plans or usage limits are stated, so it is an unusually accessible option for teams that want threat modeling without a software charge. Its Apache License 2.0 and lack of a stated usage cap make it suitable for both individual use and broader adoption, while teams should weigh the volunteer-maintenance model against any need for assured rapid incident response.

Platforms

Threat Dragon is available on Linux, macOS and Windows, as well as the web, and can be self-hosted. Desktop installers are provided for Windows, macOS and Linux. The choice between local desktop storage and a self-hosted web deployment suits teams that want to select where models reside.

Who it's for

Developers and defenders can use Threat Dragon at either beginner or experienced-modeler level. It is a strong fit for teams that want diagrams, framework options and rule-based suggestions in a free tool, especially when local storage or self-hosting matters. It is less suitable for organizations that require immediate incident investigation or response as part of their support expectations.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Free and open source, with no usage limits stated, lowers the barrier to adopting structured threat modeling.
• Pros: Multiple frameworks and context-aware threat and mitigation suggestions help teams organize reviews around their diagrams.
• Pros: Desktop, web and self-hosted deployment options provide flexibility over how teams work with models.
• Cons: Volunteer maintenance means immediate investigation or incident response may not be possible, a concern for teams that depend on rapid support.
• Cons: Web access to third-party storage services is configurable, so teams must account for setup rather than assume integrations are ready without configuration.

Alternatives

For a broader comparison, see Threat Modeling Software. CAIRIS is another free, Apache-licensed option, available on Linux, macOS, Windows and the web, with self-hosting and API support. IriusRisk may suit a reader who wants a limited free Community Edition: it caps use at three active threat models and one user with limited collaboration, while including templates and libraries and XML diagram export.

ThreatModeler Nexus offers a free Community Edition aimed at practitioners, students, developers, architects and security teams who want to experience threat modeling before scaling. ThreatOpus is a freemium alternative with a free trial and a Starter plan at 129.99 GBP per month, which includes 15 users, 10 team workspaces, 50 threat modelling generations per month, 10 repositories, and all SCM and CI providers. ThreatTree has a free tier capped at three forests, three DFDs per forest and five Attack Trees per DFD; its Pro plan costs 29.00 USD per month per user for unlimited forests.

AWS Threat Composer and ThreatForge are also free alternatives. itemis SECURE is a paid option with named-user or floating licenses, the latter shared up to a concurrent-user limit.

Verdict

Choose OWASP Threat Dragon if you want a capable, free threat-modeling tool with multiple frameworks, diagram-linked suggestions and flexible local or self-hosted deployment. Its central limitation is support responsiveness: teams that need immediate incident investigation or response should look for an option that better matches that expectation.