Finnivo

Finnivo is consolidation, reporting and planning software for organisations that need to bring financial and non-financial information together across entities and systems. It is best suited to multi-entity teams managing several reporting processes; the trade-off is custom pricing and an implementation measured in weeks.

Overview

Finnivo combines data collection, consolidation, analysis and reporting in a structured workflow intended to shorten close and reporting cycles. It covers a broad range of work, from budgets and forecasts to tax, sustainability reporting and annual financial statements, making it relevant to finance teams that want one system for multiple recurring processes.

Its scope is strongest where an organisation has several entities, cost or profit centres, or sources of information. Smaller teams with a narrow reporting need may find that breadth unnecessary, particularly when pricing requires a request and implementation takes 6–8 weeks.

Key features

Collection and consolidation

Finnivo collects financial and non-financial data from systems and people, then supports consolidation, inter-company reconciliation and elimination, and differences in accounting standards and currencies. That combination is useful for groups assembling results from multiple entities; it addresses more than the final reporting step by bringing data preparation and consolidation into the same workflow.

The maker says it can import from systems including Sage, Accpac, Microsoft Dynamics, Business Central, Syspro, Oracle, Xero, QuickBooks and SAP S/4 Hana, as well as Excel files. This range may suit organisations with mixed systems, though the breadth of supported imports does not by itself establish how a particular setup will fit.

Analysis and reporting

Analysis tools include drill-down, variance, trend, sensitivity and ad hoc analysis, scenario planning and KPI monitoring. These capabilities support both explaining past results and considering possible future outcomes. Users can design reports without coding and publish them to Excel, Word or PDF; tables and graphs in PowerPoint slides update automatically. That should help teams produce repeatable management and board outputs without rebuilding every report from scratch.

Finnivo also supports KPI dashboards and management pack templates. Data can be exported through database views or customisable APIs, while finished reports can be extracted in Excel, Word, PowerPoint or PDF. Those options give teams both presentation-ready outputs and routes to use the data elsewhere.

Controls and privacy

Role-based access, audit trails and journal reports provide controls relevant to financial reporting, and the maker says data is held in a secure, access-controlled database. Infinitus Reporting Solutions’ privacy policy describes personal-information handling under South Africa’s POPIA. Organisations should consider those controls alongside their own security and compliance requirements.

Pricing

Finnivo is paid, with custom pricing. The homepage describes the engagement as fixed scope, fixed time and fixed cost, but gives no displayed price. Buyers should request a quote against their entities, processes and implementation needs before comparing total costs.

There are no published plan tiers or free-plan terms to weigh against one another. The maker gives an implementation duration of 6–8 weeks, so Finnivo is a better fit for teams able to plan a defined rollout than for those needing a shorter stated implementation.

Platforms

Finnivo is available through web and API platforms. Excel imports and report exports are supported, alongside data export through database views or customisable APIs. This offers practical routes for connecting existing systems and using outputs in familiar formats.

Who it's for

Finnivo is aimed at organisations with multiple group entities, cost or profit centres, or information sources, across industries. It suits finance teams responsible for consolidation as well as recurring management accounts, year-end reporting, cash forecasting, budgeting and forecasting. The Knowledge Base says there is no limit to the number of processes, which may matter to groups seeking to bring many reporting workflows under one roof.

It is less compelling for a buyer that needs a publicly displayed price, a free entry point or a short stated rollout. Finnivo’s paid, custom-priced model and 6–8-week implementation favour a planned organisational deployment over an immediate lightweight tool.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Broad consolidation coverage: Inter-company reconciliation and elimination, plus support for accounting-standard and currency differences, fit multi-entity reporting needs.
• Flexible reporting outputs: No-code report design and Excel, Word, PowerPoint and PDF publishing support varied reporting audiences.
• Many data routes: Imports from named ERP and cloud systems, Excel, database views and APIs can accommodate mixed information sources.
• Controls for finance workflows: Role-based access, audit trails and journal reports address oversight needs.

Cons

• No displayed price: Custom pricing means prospective buyers must request a quote to assess affordability.
• Implementation takes 6–8 weeks: Teams seeking a quicker stated deployment should compare that timeline with their requirements.
• Provider-specific delivery: Finnivo is marketed, implemented and supported exclusively by Infinitus Reporting Solutions, so buyers work through that provider for support; technical requests go through its Service Request option.

Alternatives

Management Reporting Software is a useful category page for comparing options beyond Finnivo.

• OneStream is worth considering if Android, iOS, Windows or self-hosted access matters alongside web and API platforms; its paid platform pricing is also discussed through a demo request.
• CCH Tagetik is another paid web and self-hosted option for buyers who want to request a quote or demo.
• Cube may suit buyers looking for a plan that explicitly includes unlimited users, dimensions and dashboards; Finnivo’s published facts do not state comparable user or dashboard limits.
• Kepion is an alternative for buyers who want to contact sales for product information and a demo.
• Planful may be preferable when a subscription tailored to company size, user count and selected modules better matches procurement needs.
• Syft Analytics is a web-based freemium alternative for readers who want a free plan.
• Taxilla FP&A may suit buyers who want stated entity bands, from up to 3 entities on Essentials to up to 25+ on Enterprise.
• Vena is another option for readers comparing paid web and Windows software.

Verdict

Choose Finnivo if your organisation needs to consolidate information across entities and support reporting, planning and analysis in one workflow. Its combination of consolidation, broad analysis, flexible report outputs and multiple data routes is the main reason to choose it. Look elsewhere if you need a displayed price, a free plan or a shorter stated implementation; compare your requirements with the pricing and implementation terms from Infinitus Reporting Solutions before committing.