Conviso Platform

Overview

Conviso’s strength is bringing application context to security findings rather than leaving teams with disconnected scan results. It organizes assets, consolidates vulnerabilities, and connects architectural threats to findings from tests and scans. Remediation workflows, finding correlation, ownership mapping, risk prioritization, and SBOM management support an end-to-end program view.

The service is cloud-based, with no on-premises deployment option, so it is not a fit for organizations that require self-hosted software. Conviso says it is certified to ISO 27001 and ISO 20000 standards. Founded in 2008 and headquartered in Curitiba, Brazil, the company serves organizations ranging from startups to large corporations.

Key features

Testing and risk context

The platform covers SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, and container testing. That breadth is useful when teams want to assess multiple kinds of application risk in one program, while the asset and threat context can help put findings in a remediation order. The value depends on whether a team can adopt the platform’s cloud model and meet the plan’s contribution limits.

Development workflow and integrations

Conviso lists integrations with GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, Jira, Slack, Snyk, Semgrep, ServiceNow, and Microsoft Teams. This mix connects code hosting, CI, issue tracking, communication, and security tooling, making the platform more practical for teams already using those services. Developers plan users also get AppSec Agent AI, described as providing diagnostics, fixes, and support within the development cycle.

API and security

The GraphQL API supports queries and mutations for projects, vulnerabilities, and scans, with a documented limit of 1,200 requests per minute. That offers a defined route for custom integrations, though teams with unusually high request volumes should account for the cap. Conviso states that it is certified in ISO 27001 and ISO 20000 standards.

Pricing

The Free plan costs 0.00 USD per free and includes up to 5 contributing developers, 5 assets, 10 users, and 2 integrations. Its 48-hour SLA and tight caps make it a sensible way for a small team to explore the platform, but not a generous baseline for a growing program.

Developers costs 19.00 USD per month, billed $2,040 charged per year, and starts from U$19 per contributing developer per month. It includes unlimited assets, users, and integrations, plus AppSec Agent AI, and has a 24-hour SLA. The minimum contract is 12 months, with monthly or annual payment options and a stated 20% discount for annual payments. The published annual charge means buyers should evaluate the full commitment, not just the per-developer monthly rate.

Contributing developers are counted by commits to associated repositories during the preceding 30 days. That definition can make the bill track active contributors rather than named accounts, so teams should consider repository activity when estimating seats. The Free plan caps contributing developers at five; Developers removes the asset, user, and integration caps, but its per-contributor pricing and annual commitment still matter.

Platforms

Conviso Platform is available as an API and web service. Its cloud-only deployment rules out on-premises installation.

Who it's for

Conviso is a strong fit for organizations that want to correlate testing results with assets, threats, and ownership, and that can use a cloud service. Teams with more contributors can benefit from unlimited assets, users, and integrations on Developers, provided the 12-month commitment works for their procurement model. It is less suitable for teams needing self-hosting or a paid plan without a long minimum term.

Pros and cons

• Context across AppSec work: Asset organization, vulnerability consolidation, threat links, finding correlation, and risk prioritization support decisions beyond raw scan output.
• Broad testing scope: SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, and container testing cover multiple application security testing areas.
• Useful workflow connections: Integrations span code, CI, issue tracking, messaging, and security products, with a GraphQL API for project, vulnerability, and scan operations.
• Restrictive free ceiling: Five contributing developers, five assets, and two integrations limit how far a larger team can evaluate the service.
• Long paid commitment: Developers has a 12-month minimum, and contributing developer counts are based on recent repository commits.
• No self-hosted option: Cloud-only deployment excludes organizations with an on-premises requirement.

Alternatives

OWASP DefectDojo is worth considering for teams seeking an open-source, free-forever community edition with support through OWASP Slack and GitHub, or a self-hosted option.

Phoenix Security offers a free tier for up to 1,000 assets, two premium users plus guests, community support, and dashboard reporting; it may suit buyers whose immediate priority is a larger stated asset allowance.

SecurStack is an alternative for teams looking for a free plan with 500 scan credits per month, three users, ten projects, and SAST, SCA, and secrets scanning.

Strobes ASPM has a free tier covering up to 100 assets, 500 tasks per month, one connector, and community support, making it a candidate for teams whose needs fit those caps.

OX Security may suit teams seeking a broader set of code and pipeline security capabilities, including SAST, SCA, secrets and PII, SBOM, IaC, CI/CD, container scanning, and IDE and CLI support; its plans require a quote.

Foxnode ASPM is another free ASPM option to compare.

Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access is a paid, named-user SaaS product to consider if that access category better matches the requirement.

Legit Security ASPM is a paid alternative whose pricing and package details require contacting sales.

For broader discovery, browse Application Security Posture Management Software or Application Security Orchestration Platforms.

Verdict

Choose Conviso Platform if your organization needs application security findings tied to assets, architectural threats, and remediation ownership in a cloud service. Its testing breadth, integrations, and program-level context are the main reasons to choose it; the free tier’s small caps, per-contributor pricing, and 12-month paid minimum are the reasons to look elsewhere if your team needs self-hosting or a low-commitment paid option.