You Can See Everything, directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, follows Elizabeth Holmes and her family during the 34 days before she entered prison in 2023. The filmmakers’ production lasted three years, and the documentary is scheduled for release by A24 on October 16, 2026. Its unusual access puts the question of how to interpret Holmes on screen at the center—but it does not establish what she privately believes or intends.
What is You Can See Everything about?
A24’s synopsis says Holmes invited a skeptical film crew to document the 34 days before she began her prison sentence. The company describes the film as the result of a three-year journey. Film at Lincoln Center’s New York Film Festival listing says Holmes invited Fielder into her home, where she lived with her partner, Billy Evans, and frames the documentary around the boundary between nonfiction and fiction.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
That invitation creates the film’s central tension: how should viewers read a subject who is aware of the camera, particularly when the story concerns a company built on claims that later came under scrutiny? The premise gives the filmmakers unusual access, not an automatic answer about Holmes’s sincerity.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Did Nathan Fielder really film Elizabeth Holmes before prison?
Yes. The Associated Press reports that Fielder and Oppenheim shot the film secretly over three years. The 34 days refer to the period with Holmes before she entered prison, not the full production schedule. AP says she entered a Texas prison in May 2023.
#1 Best Overall
Fortune’s Emma Hinchliffe describes scenes of Holmes with Evans and their two children, as well as the couple making calls to investors and retrieving a Theranos device from a garage. Hinchliffe says the film’s second half shifts to Evans after Holmes is incarcerated. These are details from a reviewer’s account of the film, not a complete synopsis from the filmmakers.
Fortune also reports that Holmes and Evans had not seen the film when the article was published, and that the directors said they were no longer in touch with the couple. After the New York Film Festival screening, Fielder described the experience by saying, “I cannot tell you how weird it was that we were there.” The remark captures the filmmakers’ reaction to the access; it does not resolve how viewers should interpret what they filmed.
When does the documentary come out, and how long is it?
| Detail | What is confirmed |
|---|---|
| Release date | A24 lists October 16, 2026. |
| Runtime | Film at Lincoln Center lists 174 minutes for its 2026 U.S. production. |
| Festival screenings | AP reports a first screening at Telluride on September 6, 2026, followed by a New York Film Festival premiere. |
| Streaming or home video | No later streaming or physical home-video release is established by the available film announcements. |
The 174-minute runtime is the figure in the festival listing; it should not be confused with the 34-day period the film follows Holmes before prison.
What happened to Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos?
Holmes founded Theranos, which promised to run blood tests using very small samples. The company attracted major investment before Wall Street Journal reporting raised questions about its claimed technology, and Theranos eventually collapsed. AP reports that the company raised nearly $1 billion from investors and was valued at $4.5 billion in 2014.
Rank #3
In 2022, Holmes was found guilty of defrauding investors. Fortune reports she was acquitted of charges involving defrauding patients; AP describes her conviction as four felony counts of fraud and conspiracy. Those outcomes are distinct: the investor-fraud conviction should not be described as a conviction for defrauding patients.
The film revisits the Theranos story and, according to Fortune’s review, returns to the Wall Street Journal reporting and to a claim Holmes made to journalist Roger Parloff about the device’s capabilities. Those are part of the documentary’s account of the controversy, not evidence that Theranos’s blood-testing claims were scientifically validated.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Does the film prove whether Holmes was lying?
No. Fortune’s Hinchliffe characterizes the filmmakers’ approach as probing whether Holmes is lying, and Film at Lincoln Center describes the film in terms of documentary objectivity and the fiction–nonfiction boundary. Those are descriptions of the work’s approach and a reviewer’s interpretation, not independent findings about Holmes’s inner motives.
In the first clip released from the film, Holmes asks Fielder, “Why would I deceive you?” AP also reported Fielder saying after a screening, “I am still struggling to this day to understand what I went through.” The questions and reactions underline the documentary’s uncertainty; neither quotation settles the matter.
Best Value
What background helps put the film in context?
For readers who want a fuller account of Theranos beyond the documentary, John Carreyrou’s Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup, published in 2018, is an optional book-length account of the company. It is background reading, not an official film companion or tie-in.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

