Daniel Ellsberg was a U.S. government analyst and RAND researcher who copied and disclosed a classified history of U.S. decision-making in Vietnam. He said he leaked it because he believed the public had been deceived about the war and that revealing the record might help shorten it. The publication sparked a landmark fight over press freedom; Ellsberg was not convicted, and his prosecution was dismissed in 1973 after government misconduct came to light.
Who was Daniel Ellsberg?
Ellsberg was a military analyst and government consultant with direct access to a classified Defense Department study of the Vietnam War. He joined the Defense Department in 1964, served at the U.S. Embassy in Saigon for two years beginning in 1965, and returned to RAND in 1967. There, he worked on the top-secret study later known as the Pentagon Papers. He died on June 16, 2023. The University of Massachusetts Amherst exhibit and Ellsberg’s official biography describe his career and role.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
What were the Pentagon Papers?
Commissioned by Defense Secretary Robert McNamara in 1967 and completed in late 1968, the study examined U.S. decision-making in Indochina from 1945 through 1968. It comprised 7,000 pages in 47 volumes. Ellsberg was among the few people who read the full study, according to the UMass Amherst exhibit.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →The papers documented decisions and public statements by successive administrations about the war. The exhibit describes them as showing that officials repeatedly misled the public. Ellsberg himself characterized the documents as evidence of “a quarter century of aggression, broken treaties, deceptions, stolen elections, lies and murder”; that is his assessment, not a neutral legal finding.
#1 Best Overall
Why did Ellsberg leak the papers?
Ellsberg had initially supported U.S. policy in Vietnam. His government work, experience in the country, and reading of the historical record changed his view: he came to regard the war as unjust and unwinnable, and believed the public had repeatedly been deceived. He thought Americans deserved to know what their government had done and hoped disclosure could turn opinion against the war. The UMass exhibit recounts that evolution.
In a 2017 Fresh Air interview, Ellsberg explained that his immediate priority was reducing the ongoing war: “The nuclear information, I thought then and now, was actually more important. But the bombs were falling in Vietnam at that time, and I wanted to shorten that war as much as I could.” The remark reflects how he ranked his concerns at the time; it does not establish that the leak itself ended the war.
Rank #2
How did the leak reach newspapers?
- Copying the study: Ellsberg and former colleague Anthony Russo began photocopying it in October 1969.
- Seeking congressional disclosure: Ellsberg first offered the documents to antiwar senators, including members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, hoping they would place them in the public record. They declined.
- Sharing them with the press: In spring 1971, Ellsberg gave New York Times correspondent Neil Sheehan access. The UMass exhibit reports that Sheehan and his wife secretly copied the papers while Ellsberg was away.
- Publication and court challenge: The New York Times published its first report on June 13, 1971. After the government obtained an order stopping the Times from publishing, the Washington Post and other newspapers also published material.
On June 30, 1971, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 against the government’s effort to stop the newspapers from publishing. The ruling limited prior restraint in this particular case; it was not a general authorization to disclose classified information. The timeline and decision are summarized by the UMass exhibit and the Ellsberg biography.
Was Daniel Ellsberg convicted?
No. Ellsberg was indicted on 12 federal felony counts, including charges under the Espionage Act, and faced a possible 115-year sentence. In 1973, the judge dismissed the charges with prejudice after learning of government misconduct directed at Ellsberg. His account names the burglary of his former psychiatrist’s office among the actions Nixon secretly directed. The Nixon Presidential Library likewise describes the break-in as an effort to find information to discredit him and connects the “Plumbers” to the Watergate burglary.
What did the leak have to do with Watergate?
The publication triggered a rapid legal confrontation over whether the government could prevent newspapers from printing the material. Separately, the Nixon administration’s illegal effort to discredit Ellsberg became part of the broader chain of criminal conduct associated with Watergate. These events are connected, but Ellsberg did not cause Watergate. Nor do the cited accounts establish that his leak alone ended the Vietnam War or directly caused Nixon’s resignation.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Where to learn more
Ellsberg’s official books page lists Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers, his first-person account. It can provide his perspective on the events, alongside institutional histories and court records.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Recommended Free Tools
