Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Neanderthal-associated spears were sophisticated wooden weapons, mostly made from slow-growing spruce at Schöningen and shaped with a double taper that put more mass toward the front. Experiments with replicas show that skilled throwers could hit targets at up to about 20 metres, while injury evidence from Germany proves that Neanderthals also used spears at close range for forceful thrusting. The weapons were therefore versatile hunting tools, although the exact hominin species that made the oldest Schöningen examples remains debated.
The short answer: wood, careful shaping and two ways of fighting
The best-preserved group is the Schöningen assemblage, generally dated to about 300,000 years ago. At least 10 complete or nearly complete wooden spears were recovered there, together with approximately 16,000 animal bones and abundant large-herbivore remains. Most of the spears were made from slow-growing spruce (Picea).
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
These were not merely straight branches with a point at one end. Schöningen specimens taper toward both ends, and their widest section lies in the front half. That geometry makes the front heavier than the rear, a balance expected of a projectile as well as a thrusting weapon. Controlled tests using replicas support hand throwing at distances up to about 20 metres by trained athletes. Separate evidence from wounded fallow deer shows that Neanderthals used spears in close-range, direct attacks too.
“Effective” must be read carefully. Experiments demonstrate that a replica could carry enough kinetic energy to strike and kill a target under test conditions. Archaeology cannot provide a prehistoric hit rate, average hunting distance or a guaranteed kill distance for every spear user.
#1 Best Overall
- SET OF 6 PREHISTORIC SKULLS || Set of six prehistoric skulls. Consists of Afarenis cranium, Africanus cranium, Habilis cranium, Erectus cranium, Neanderthalensis cranial and Steinheim skull
- LIFE SIZED || Each prehistoric skull is approx. 10" in size
- INCREDIBLE REALISM || Models are hand painted. Realistic details, textures and bony landmarks provide an incredible amount of realism for examining Neanderthal skulls
- DURABLE POLYMER CONSTRUCTION || Made of durable and sturdy plastisol polymer. This washable model is easy to clean and will hold up to years of handling
What wood were the spears made from?
Schöningen: mostly spruce
Wood identification at Schöningen points primarily to slow-growing spruce. The wider wooden-artefact assemblage also includes pine, willow, birch, poplar, larch and other woods. The safest statement is therefore that the famous complete spears are mostly spruce, while several tree species were available to Middle Pleistocene toolmakers at the site.
Spruce matters because the surviving weapons preserve a deliberate choice of material and form rather than an accidental stick. The shafts were worked into regular, symmetrical shapes. Their front-heavy balance is a physical property that can be measured on replicas and is consistent with a weapon intended to travel point-first after release.
The Clacton spear: an older yew example
A separate fragment from Clacton, approximately 400,000 years old, was made from yew (Taxus). It is one of the earliest known wooden spear finds in Europe. The Clacton piece should not be treated as proof that every Neanderthal spear was yew, nor as a specimen with the same design as the Schöningen weapons. It demonstrates instead that archaic human groups selected different woods for hunting weapons over time and place.
| Find | Approximate date | Wood identified | What can be concluded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schöningen complete or nearly complete spears | About 300,000 years old | Mostly slow-growing spruce; other woods occur in the wider assemblage | Several carefully shaped wooden weapons had a forward-heavy, double-tapered form. |
| Clacton spear fragment | About 400,000 years old | Yew | Yew was used for an early European spear; its maker and exact function should not be assumed to match Schöningen. |
How were the wooden spears constructed?
Double taper and a front-loaded balance
A Schöningen spear narrows toward both ends rather than remaining a uniform cylinder. The maximum diameter is in the forward half, so the point and front section carry more mass than the rear. This arrangement helps keep the heavy end leading during flight and also concentrates force when the point is driven into an animal.
The shape is important evidence because a spear’s use cannot be inferred from its point alone. A sharpened pole could be used to jab, brace or throw. In Schöningen’s case, the repeated double-tapered design and measured balance fit a projectile interpretation, while the robust wooden construction would also tolerate close contact.
Why balance is more informative than appearance
Modern replicas made from Norwegian spruce reproduced the approximate mass and shape of the archaeological weapons. When six trained javelin athletes threw 760-gram and 800-gram replicas, the weapons behaved as usable projectiles rather than tumbling sticks. The experiment tested what the design could do, not how often a Pleistocene hunter succeeded.
The Scientific Reports study found overlap between the performance parameters of hand-thrown spears and those of spears launched with a spearthrower. That overlap does not establish that Schöningen hunters possessed a spearthrower; it shows that the aerodynamic and energetic demands of the replicas are compatible with more than one launch style.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Could Neanderthals throw spears accurately?
What the replica experiment actually measured
In the 2019 experiment associated with University College London and published by Milks and colleagues in Scientific Reports, six trained javelin athletes threw replicas weighing 760 g or 800 g. They achieved accurate target hits at distances up to 20 metres.
The study’s authors concluded that the data support the use of double-tapered Schöningen-type spears as throwing weapons on both flat and parabolic trajectories at distances up to 20 m. A flat trajectory is a relatively direct path, while a parabolic trajectory uses a higher arc. The result demonstrates a practical range for skilled throwers under controlled conditions; it is not a population-wide Neanderthal average.
What “accurate” means here
Accuracy in this context means that the trained participants could hit the experimental targets at the reported distances. Their athletic training, modern practice and repeated attempts are important qualifications. The experiment does not tell us whether an untrained hunter could do the same, how many throws were needed, or how accuracy changed in cold weather, darkness, rough ground or a moving herd.
Skill was a major variable. The Scientific Reports analysis concluded that successful use depends materially on the thrower’s ability. This fits a hunting system in which experienced people learned to judge distance, angle, target movement and release timing rather than relying on the weapon alone.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteHow far could a Neanderthal spear be thrown?
The best-supported figure is up to about 20 metres for accurate target hits by the six trained javelin athletes using 760 g and 800 g Norwegian-spruce replicas. The same work supports both direct and arcing throws within that distance.
Rank #2
- Authentic Viking Design: Handmade 31" Viking spear inspired by traditional Norse weaponry—perfect for historical collectors, Viking fans, and reenactors. Blade Legnth : 14" Handle : 17"
- PREMIUM CONSTRUCTION: Wooden recurve bow built with high-quality materials and expert craftsmanship for reliable performance
- COMFORTABLE GRIP: Leather-wrapped handle provides superior control and reduces hand fatigue during extended use
- Leather Sheath Included: Comes with a custom-fit leather sheath for safe storage and an authentic warrior look
- Versatile Use: Ideal for medieval decor, Viking-themed gifts, cosplay, LARP, SCA events, or wall displays.
Twenty metres is an experimental capability, not a fixed maximum. A spear could travel farther and still be dangerous, but the study’s target-hit result ends at the distance reported in the evidence. Conversely, a hunter might choose a shorter distance to improve hit probability or increase penetration. Range would vary with spear mass, wood, weather, target motion, release technique and the user’s training.
| Question | Evidence-based answer | Confidence and limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Could a replica be thrown? | Yes. Trained javelin athletes threw 760 g and 800 g replicas. | Direct experimental result; modern athletes are not a prehistoric population sample. |
| Could it hit a target? | Yes, accurate hits were recorded up to about 20 m. | Direct result under controlled conditions; no prehistoric hit-rate estimate. |
| Could the impact be lethal? | UCL’s study summary interprets the combination of mass and speed as enough kinetic energy to hit and kill a target. | Experimental inference about capability, not evidence of a particular ancient kill. |
| Was a spearthrower required? | No requirement was established; hand throwing produced the reported performance, and parameters overlapped with spearthrower use. | Compatibility is not proof that a spearthrower was used at Schöningen. |
Were the spears used for stabbing, throwing or both?
Close-range thrusting at Neumark-Nord
A separate study in Nature Ecology & Evolution examined two fallow-deer skeletons from Neumark-Nord in Germany. The animals date to about 120,000 years ago and came from deposits containing abundant Neanderthal traces. Micro-CT analysis of the bone perforations, combined with ballistic experiments, identified the injuries as damage caused by close-range thrusting spears.
This is direct archaeological evidence of a confrontational hunting method. A hunter had to approach an animal, drive the spear into it and work with other people in a dangerous encounter. The finding demonstrates that Neanderthal hunting was not limited to standing back and throwing.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesWhy the same general weapon could serve both roles
A robust wooden spear can be carried into a close encounter and released from a distance. The Schöningen geometry favors flight, but a forward-heavy point also concentrates force during a thrust. The evidence therefore supports a flexible toolkit rather than a strict division between “throwing spears” and “stabbing spears.”
| Delivery mode | Relevant evidence | What it tells us |
|---|---|---|
| Hand throwing | Replica trials with six trained javelin athletes; accurate hits up to 20 m | Schöningen-type spears could function as distance weapons in skilled hands. |
| Close-range thrusting | Micro-CT and ballistic analysis of two Neumark-Nord fallow-deer skeletons | Neanderthals used spears in direct attacks at very short range. |
| Spearthrower-assisted launch | Performance parameters overlapped with the experimental hand-thrown results | The design is physically compatible with a spearthrower, but the artefacts do not prove one was used. |
Could a wooden spear kill a deer or horse?
For deer-sized prey, the evidence is strong that a wooden spear could inflict lethal trauma. The Neumark-Nord deer injuries show that thrusting penetrated bone, and the replica study found that a thrown spear could deliver significant impact. UCL’s summary interprets the measured combination of weight and speed as sufficient to hit and kill a target.
Those findings establish capability, not a guaranteed outcome in every hunt. A kill depends on where the point lands, penetration depth, animal movement, follow-up attacks and cooperation among hunters. The experiments did not measure a prehistoric success rate.
Large animals such as horses would have been especially dangerous. Schöningen’s associated assemblage contains abundant large-herbivore remains, but the presence of bones does not by itself prove that every animal was killed with a spear or that the weapons routinely killed horses with one throw. The defensible conclusion is that these spears had enough structural and impact performance to be serious big-game weapons, used either from a distance or during coordinated close encounters.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
What does the archaeological context say about Neanderthals?
The Schöningen weapons were made by Middle Pleistocene hominins. They are often discussed in connection with Neanderthals because of the age, region and broader archaeological record, and because distance hunting is now considered likely to have been within the Neanderthal repertoire. However, the exact species attribution for the Schöningen assemblage is not conclusively settled.
Use “Neanderthal-associated” or “available to Neanderthals” rather than presenting the maker as an established fact. The Neumark-Nord injury study provides a stronger Neanderthal connection because the deposits contain abundant Neanderthal traces and the researchers identified the deer damage as close-range spear thrusting.
Annemieke Milks of the UCL Institute of Archaeology described the significance this way: “This study is important because it adds to a growing body of evidence that Neanderthals were technologically savvy and had the ability to hunt big game through a variety of hunting strategies, not just risky close encounters.” Her conclusion is about behavioral capability, while the Schöningen maker attribution remains a separate archaeological question.
How strong is each line of evidence?
- Wooden artefacts: Direct evidence that carefully shaped spears existed, with spruce dominant at Schöningen and yew represented at Clacton.
- Geometry and balance: Direct measurements support a forward-heavy projectile design, although shape alone cannot reveal every use.
- Replica throwing trials: Controlled evidence that skilled throwers could hit targets to about 20 m and generate potentially lethal impact.
- Animal injuries: Direct evidence from Neumark-Nord that Neanderthals used thrusting spears at close range.
- Hunting success rates: Not recoverable from the current evidence. Archaeology cannot say what percentage of throws hit or killed.
- Exact maker of Schöningen spears: Still an attribution issue; the cautious label is Neanderthal-associated rather than definitively Neanderthal-made.
What the evidence changes about Neanderthal hunting
The combined picture is more capable and more adaptable than the old stereotype of a hunter who could only approach prey at arm’s length. The Schöningen replicas show that a wooden weapon could be thrown accurately at medium distance, while the Neumark-Nord deer show that direct thrusting remained part of the repertoire. Different situations could call for different choices: a throw from roughly 20 m when a clear opportunity existed, a coordinated close attack when terrain or animal behavior made distance impossible, or repeated use of both methods.
The most careful conclusion is therefore not that every Neanderthal spear was a long-range missile. It is that Neanderthal-associated wooden spears were engineered well enough to serve as projectiles and strong enough to function in close combat. Their makers selected suitable wood, controlled the shape and balance, and used hunting strategies that demanded substantial skill and cooperation.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
