PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchIn India, courts have used personality or publicity rights to protect identifiable aspects of a person’s persona—including their name, image, likeness and voice—from certain unauthorized uses. These rights are not a blanket veto over references to a person: the legal issue depends on how the identity is used, what interest is claimed, the evidence and the competing context, including freedom of expression.
What personality rights protect
Personality rights, sometimes discussed as publicity rights, concern the use of identity attributes that point to a particular person. Courts have considered attributes such as a person’s name, image, likeness, voice and other recognizable features of their persona. The concern can arise when another party uses those attributes without authorization, especially in a commercial context. Whether a particular use is legally actionable depends on the facts; merely mentioning or depicting someone does not automatically establish a violation.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The concept matters because identity can carry both personal and commercial significance. The Delhi High Court has described publicity rights as recognizing the commercial value of a person’s image or persona and protecting a proprietary interest in the profitability of that public reputation. That is the court’s summary in Krishna Kishore Singh v. Sarla A Saraogi, not a rule that every use of a well-known person’s identity is prohibited. Read the Delhi High Court decision.
Recommended Free Tools
In a separate order, the Delhi High Court observed that intellectual-property protections for individual attributes can have dimensions connected with rights protected by the Constitution of India. That observation appears in the interim order in Anil Kapoor v. Simply Life India, dated 20 September 2023. It illustrates why these disputes can involve more than a simple question of who owns a photograph or recording; it does not itself establish a universal rule for every identity-related claim. Read the Anil Kapoor order.
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
How the protection works in India
The cited decisions do not establish a single, comprehensive personality-rights statute. Instead, Indian courts have addressed persona and identity through cases involving privacy, publicity, intellectual-property interests and constitutional interests. A reader should therefore be wary of treating “personality rights” as one fixed statutory entitlement with an automatic outcome. The right asserted, the particular use and the procedural posture of the case all matter.
A court may be asked for an interim injunction—temporary relief sought while a case is pending—or may decide a matter at a later stage. An interim order records a court’s assessment at that stage and on the material before it; it should not be reported as a final decision resolving every possible dispute about the person’s identity. The 2023 Anil Kapoor order and the 2024 Arijit Singh order discussed below are interim orders.
When assessing a disputed use, the decisions point to several practical questions rather than one automatic trigger:
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteRank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
- Whose identity is involved? Is the person identifiable from the name, image, voice or combination of attributes used?
- What attribute and use are challenged? A photograph, a name in a story, a voice imitation and merchandise present different factual settings.
- Is the use authorized? Authorization is relevant, but the existence or absence of permission does not by itself settle every legal issue.
- What is the context? A commercial use, expressive work or use combining both may raise different considerations.
- What interest is asserted and what does the record show? The claimant’s legal basis, the evidence and the specific defendants or material are important.
- What competing interests apply? Freedom of expression and other relevant circumstances can affect whether relief is appropriate.
- What stage is the case at? An interim restraint and a final ruling have different procedural meanings.
This framework helps explain why a court order concerning one person and specified defendants cannot be converted into a nationwide ban on a whole category of speech or technology.
What the Anil Kapoor case decided at the interim stage
On 20 September 2023, the Delhi High Court considered Anil Kapoor’s request for protection of his name, image, likeness, voice and other attributes. The court found a prima facie case for ex parte interim relief and restrained specified defendants from specified uses of his persona. The order addressed, among other things, certain AI-generated and commercial content, face-morphing and merchandise uses. “Prima facie” describes an initial assessment for purposes of interim relief; it is not the same as a final ruling after a complete determination of all issues.
The decision is relevant to people asking whether synthetic or altered media can be challenged. It shows that, on the facts and at the stage before it, the court was prepared to grant interim protection against some specified uses involving Kapoor’s persona. It does not mean that every AI-generated depiction, parody, reference, altered image or use of a public figure’s name is automatically unlawful. The scope of the restraint was tied to the suit and the uses addressed in the order.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
The court wrote: “The present case shows how elements of intellectual property that protect the attributes of an individual, in fact have other dimensions including rights protected by the Constitution of India.” The observation reflects the court’s reasoning in that particular order. It is useful context for understanding why identity disputes may involve intersecting legal interests, but it should be read alongside the order’s specific procedural and factual setting. See the full order.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →What the Arijit Singh case adds about voice and AI
On 26 July 2024, the Bombay High Court issued an interim order in Arijit Singh v. Codible Ventures LLP. The dispute addressed alleged uses of the singer’s name, image, voice, vocal style, manner of singing and other attributes, including AI voice models and synthesized voice imitations. The order makes the case relevant to questions about whether reproducing or imitating a recognizable voice can raise a personality-rights issue.
Voice disputes are not limited to a literal copy of an existing recording. The allegations in Singh’s case concerned voice and vocal characteristics, including synthesized imitations. Still, the existence of an allegation and an interim order does not establish that every imitation or synthetic voice is prohibited. The context, identifiability, use, asserted legal interest and evidence remain significant, and the result in this case should not be generalized beyond its setting. Read the Bombay High Court interim order.
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
Limits: expression, public information and context
Personality or publicity rights must be understood alongside freedom of expression. A person’s public profile does not automatically make every reference to them an unauthorized commercial exploitation, and an identity claim does not by itself resolve whether a film, article or other expressive work may be published. Courts consider the particular material and the claim before them.
In Krishna Kishore Singh v. Sarla A Saraogi, decided on 11 July 2023, the Delhi High Court declined an application seeking an interim restraint against a film about Sushant Singh Rajput. The court found the material was drawn from publicly available reporting and addressed freedom of expression. This was a decision about the record and request before the court; it does not establish that any publication using public information is immune from all possible claims.
The same decision rejected, on the facts before it, the plaintiff’s attempt to inherit the deceased person’s asserted privacy, publicity and personality rights. That holding should be described narrowly: it is not a complete statement of every possible posthumous claim or the law in every future case. Someone considering a claim involving a deceased person’s persona should not assume that a family member automatically inherits the same rights, or that the ruling answers every related legal question. Read the Delhi High Court decision.
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
How the three decisions differ
The cases are most useful when read as examples of different facts, claims and procedural settings, not as interchangeable precedents for every dispute.
| Case | Issue and setting | What the decision supports | Important limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anil Kapoor v. Simply Life India, Delhi High Court, 20 September 2023 | Request for protection of name, image, likeness, voice and other attributes; certain AI, face-morphing and commercial uses were addressed. | The court found a prima facie case and granted ex parte interim relief against specified defendants and specified uses. | Interim, case-specific relief—not a final national rule or a blanket ban on AI or references to public figures. Order. |
| Arijit Singh v. Codible Ventures LLP, Bombay High Court, 26 July 2024 | Interim proceedings concerning alleged uses of name, image, voice, vocal style and other attributes, including AI voice models and synthesized voices. | A recognizable voice imitation may raise a personality-rights issue depending on the claim and context. | The order does not settle that every imitation or synthetic voice is unlawful. Order. |
| Krishna Kishore Singh v. Sarla A Saraogi, Delhi High Court, 11 July 2023 | Application to restrain a film about Sushant Singh Rajput; the court considered public-domain reporting and expression, as well as asserted posthumous rights. | The court declined the interim restraint and rejected inheritance of the asserted rights on the facts before it. | Does not make every use of public information immune or comprehensively resolve all posthumous claims. Decision. |
What to do if you believe your identity has been misused
A useful first step is to preserve the material and the circumstances in which it appeared. The question is not only whether a name, image or voice is present, but how the content identifies the person, who made or distributed it, and what use is being made of it. A clear record can help a qualified lawyer assess the relevant facts without assuming that one of the reported cases decides the matter automatically.
- Save the specific content. Keep copies or captures of the image, recording, post, page or product listing, along with the address where it appeared and the date you encountered it, when available.
- Record the context. Note whether it appears to be advertising, merchandise, commentary, a film or other expressive material, an imitation, or a mix of uses. Preserve surrounding text rather than only an isolated image or audio clip.
- Identify the attribute at issue. Be precise about whether the concern is a name, image, likeness, voice, vocal style or multiple recognizable features, and why the person can be identified.
- Gather information about authorization and use. Record any relevant permission, terms or communication and, where apparent, how the material is being distributed or used commercially.
- Seek advice based on the facts. A lawyer can assess which legal interests may apply and whether a court remedy is appropriate. The cited cases discuss interim injunctions and damages as possible remedies, but neither is guaranteed by the existence of a disputed use.
This is general information, not individualized legal advice. The appropriate claim and response depend on the actual content, evidence, parties and context.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Quick Recap
What these rights do not mean
- They do not create an automatic right to prevent every mention, depiction or discussion of a person.
- They do not make every AI-generated image, deepfake, voice imitation or altered image unlawful solely because it resembles someone.
- An interim order in a particular person’s case is not, by itself, a final rule governing all people, platforms or content.
- A decision declining one request for an injunction does not establish that all comparable claims must fail.
- The Delhi High Court’s ruling about inheritance in the Sushant Singh Rajput film dispute should not be treated as a comprehensive answer to every posthumous-rights question.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
