A newly described adult skull fragment from Drimolen, South Africa, is reported to be about 2 million years old. The fossil, named DNH 127, strengthens evidence that Homo erectus was present in southern Africa roughly 200,000 years earlier than the age of adult fossils often used for comparison—not that this report has settled where the species originated.
What the new fossil is—and where it was found
DNH 127 is an adult cranial, or skull, fragment from Drimolen Main Quarry in South Africa. A 2026 report says it is about 2 million years old and describes it as a newly published fossil attributed to Homo erectus. The report covers 18 hominin fossils assigned to Homo erectus and Paranthropus robustus, including material recovered during excavations at the quarry. La Trobe University’s report via ScienceDaily notes that the quarry was discovered in 1992 and excavated through 2019.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
JIANEEXSQ Real Trilobite Fossil from Hunan of China 450 Million Years Ago for Collections and... | $19.75 | Buy on Amazon |
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
What “200,000 years earlier” means
The headline’s comparison is between DNH 127, dated in the report to about 2.0 million years ago, and adult Homo erectus fossils from elsewhere, including material from Dmanisi, Georgia, reported at about 1.8 million years old. Subtracting those approximate ages gives the roughly 200,000-year difference. It is an age comparison, not a claim that scientists have pinpointed the species’ birthplace or established a precise first-appearance date.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
| Fossil or comparison | Reported age | What it contributes |
|---|---|---|
| Drimolen DNH 127, adult skull fragment | About 2.0 million years | Newly described adult Homo erectus evidence from South Africa, according to the 2026 report. |
| Dmanisi adult Homo erectus material | About 1.8 million years | Comparison cited in the report; the approximate age difference is about 200,000 years. |
| Drimolen DNH 134, child skull | Age context reported in 2020 as supporting a presence 100,000–200,000 years earlier than previously thought | Earlier Drimolen evidence. The child was estimated at two to four years old in the 2026 account. |
The accessible reporting does not give enough detail to compare dating methods or uncertainty ranges across Drimolen and Dmanisi. The figures should therefore be read as approximate reported ages, not as a precise measurement of the timing of migration or evolution.
#1 Best Overall
- Feature: It is real, nature and authentic. Not fake or man-made.
- Size: It is variation 5cm - 8cm. Send by random.
- Note: Coz it is real fossil, each will be slightly different in shape, color, and size. Send by random.
- From: It is from the Hunan Province of China. Time: 450 million years ago silurian period.
- Gift: Memorable gift to friend, kids or family.
How this relates to the earlier Drimolen child fossil
DNH 127 is not the first Drimolen fossil presented as evidence of early Homo erectus. The child skull DNH 134 had already been reported from the same site. In 2020, the University of Cape Town described the dating as evidence that Homo erectus existed 100,000–200,000 years earlier than previously thought; Monash University’s account says the DNH 134 reconstruction used more than 150 fragments. DNH 127 adds an adult specimen to the Drimolen evidence. The 2026 report quotes lead researcher Jesse Martin describing the new adult fossil as “providing further confirmation” of the species’ presence in southern Africa around 2 million years ago.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the fossils may reveal about two hominins
The 2026 report also contrasts Homo erectus with another hominin found in the material, Paranthropus robustus. It describes P. robustus as developing larger teeth and stronger chewing muscles between about 2 million and 1.8 million years ago, while characterizing H. erectus as having a larger brain and smaller molars. The report’s suggestion that this pattern could relate to greater meat consumption by H. erectus is tentative; it should not be treated as a conclusion established by the fossil comparison alone.
What the discovery does—and does not—establish
The new adult fossil adds support for an early southern African presence of Homo erectus. It does not, on its own, prove that the species originated in South Africa, identify the route by which it spread, or resolve the wider question of its origin. The study is identified as Martin and colleagues’ 2026 paper, “New hominin cranial and mandibular remains from Drimolen Main Quarry, South Africa,” in Annals of Human Biology; its bibliographic record is available via the DOI. The primary paper’s detailed methods and dating uncertainty ranges are not established by the accessible report, so more exact claims about them are not warranted here.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
