Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11In a May 2021 interview reported by Futurism, neuroscientist and physician Miguel Nicolelis said Neuralink had not done anything he considered innovative and criticized Elon Musk’s technology-first public claims. His comments were an expert’s opinion, not a regulatory finding or proof that Neuralink lacked engineering advances. The same report acknowledged sophisticated hardware and potential usefulness for people with paralysis.
What Miguel Nicolelis said about Neuralink
Nicolelis objected to both the novelty claims and the way invasive brain technology was discussed publicly. As quoted by Futurism from an interview with Inverse, he said: “Neuralink hasn’t done anything that I consider innovative at all.”
He also warned that technology advocates could overlook the person undergoing surgery: “What I see is most of these guys, these techie guys, going there and talking about technology like there is no human being behind what is going to be done.”
Those statements should be read as Nicolelis’s judgment. They do not independently establish that every Neuralink component copied earlier work, nor do they settle whether Neuralink’s system contains engineering improvements.
#1 Best Overall
Why he questioned Musk’s claims
Brain-computer interfaces predate Neuralink
Implanted brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) were not invented by Neuralink. Reuters reported in 2023 that researchers had experimented with such devices for more than four decades. Nicolelis’s criticism was that Neuralink and Musk presented familiar research goals as if they represented an entirely new breakthrough.
Prior work does not automatically make a new device unoriginal: a company can improve electrodes, surgical tools, signal processing, reliability or usability without inventing the underlying concept. Conversely, a polished demonstration does not prove that a system delivers broad medical benefits.
Rank #2
More electrodes are not automatically better treatment
Neuralink has emphasized dense electrode arrays and sophisticated hardware. Reuters reported that experts still debated whether increasing electrode counts would produce significantly better outcomes for patients. Recording more neural signals may help some tasks, but clinical value depends on signal quality, decoding software, surgery, durability and the user’s needs.
The human and surgical stakes
A penetrating BCI requires invasive neurosurgery. That makes patient welfare, removability and long-term reliability part of the innovation question, not secondary details.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Rank #3
Reuters’ December 2023 historical report described concerns raised during FDA interactions by employees, former employees and outside experts, including possible thread migration, battery failure, difficulty removing the device and overheating. These were reported risks and concerns, not evidence that each problem occurred in a patient, and they should not be presented as a current FDA finding without checking the agency’s latest records.
Gene Civillico, a neurophysiologist formerly involved in FDA and NIH neural-implant work, summarized the difficulty for Reuters: “The reason we don’t have a (BCI) device yet like Neuralink’s is not because no one has spent any money on it,” he said. “It’s not because Elon Musk hasn’t thought about it enough. It’s because it’s a hard problem.”
Rank #4
Owen Faris, who helps oversee the FDA’s Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, added: “Innovation and safety are not an either-or scenario.”
What the later timeline does—and does not—show
| Date | What is documented | What it does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2021 | Futurism reported Nicolelis’s criticism and noted possible use for paralysis and sophisticated Neuralink hardware. | It was not an independent audit of Neuralink’s novelty or clinical performance. |
| December 20, 2023 | Reuters described the field’s history, FDA-related concerns and comparisons with other implant developers. | It was historical reporting, not a statement of Neuralink’s present FDA status. |
| January 2024 | A 2025 SEC-filed Cortigent exhibit said Neuralink began a six-year PRIME study of its N1 BCI to evaluate safety and initial effectiveness for controlling external devices. | A study’s purpose is not evidence that safety or effectiveness has been demonstrated. |
| 2025 filing | The Cortigent exhibit said Neuralink had announced seven implants. | That is a filing’s account of company announcements, not an independently verified patient count or outcome report. |
The relevant documents available for this article do not establish live enrollment, trial results or current authorization status as of September 28, 2026. Present-tense claims about those matters require a current official trial record or regulator source.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Best Value
- Learn about your brainwaves, train your meditation, and develop your own applications with the mindwave mobile wireless headset.
- Bt/ble Dual mode module and support iOS, Android, PC, and Mac platform. Detects raw-brainwaves, eeg power spectrums (Alpha, beta, etc.), esense meters for attention, meditation, and future algorithms.
- More than 100 brain training games and educational apps available from the NeuroSky online store. Uses a single AAA battery (not included) for 8-hour battery run time
How to evaluate Neuralink claims responsibly
- Separate novelty from usefulness: an incremental engineering advance can matter even when the research idea is decades old.
- Ask for patient outcomes: demonstrations of cursor or device control are not the same as durable improvements in daily life.
- Examine safety over time: implantation, infection, migration, heating, battery life, removal and maintenance all matter.
- Check the evidence date and source: company announcements, a competitor’s SEC filing, journalism and peer-reviewed clinical results carry different evidentiary weight.
- Distinguish study aims from results: “evaluating safety and initial effectiveness” describes what a trial is designed to measure, not what it has proved.
How Neuralink compares with other BCI approaches
Comparisons are meaningful only when they use the same evidence date and clinical context. Useful axes include:
- whether electrodes penetrate brain tissue or sit on its surface;
- the surgical access required and whether the system can be removed;
- the intended task and patient population;
- human trial stage and published clinical evidence;
- device reliability and known safety issues; and
- regulatory status.
Reuters contrasted Neuralink’s penetrating electrodes with Precision Neuroscience’s surface-conforming approach while noting that companies were at different stages. Neither approach should be declared superior without comparable human evidence.
The bottom line on Nicolelis’s criticism
Nicolelis challenged Musk’s portrayal of Neuralink as an unprecedented breakthrough and insisted that the person receiving an implant must remain central to the discussion. The fairest reading is narrower than “Neuralink has no innovation”: the 2021 dispute showed that technical sophistication, public demonstrations and high electrode counts do not by themselves prove clinical benefit. Safety data, durable patient outcomes and transparent regulatory evidence are what would answer the larger claims.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute
