NASA is reportedly evaluating bulk purchases of launch services for its Moon Base program, but the available report does not name any rockets or providers. It does not establish that SpaceX is being phased out. NASA’s current oversight record still lists SpaceX and Blue Origin as lead contractors for the human landing system work tied to the revised Artemis plan.
What NASA is reportedly considering
A Bloomberg-attributed report says NASA is evaluating bulk buys of launchers to support Moon Base deliveries and expects to announce an initial group in the near future. Moon Base Program Manager Carlos García-Galán reportedly described the idea as a way to secure launch options and pair rockets with commercial lunar landers as cargo needs grow. The report says NASA may buy four or five different rockets at a time, but does not identify them.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The report was available as a Reddit repost attributed to Bloomberg; the original Bloomberg article was not independently accessible for this account. Accordingly, the proposed buy, its timing and the details attributed to García-Galán should be treated as reported rather than as a published NASA procurement decision.
Does this mean NASA is phasing out SpaceX?
No. The available evidence does not show that NASA has decided to exclude SpaceX. The Bloomberg-attributed report leaves open whether Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy would be included. Separately, the U.S. Government Accountability Office’s 2026 assessment says NASA continues to work with SpaceX and Blue Origin to accelerate their human landing system work for the revised Artemis plan, with NASA still targeting a first crewed lunar landing in 2028.
#1 Best Overall
- Recreate the main stage for all the action on the show Space: 1999 ! Base measures 18-inches x 12-inches. Includes 5 unique landing pads, a 4-piece vacuform base, in-scale Eagle Transporters, and more!
Those are related but distinct roles. A company’s human landing system contract is not the same thing as a NASA decision about which launch services to use for Moon Base cargo. The report does not name a launch provider, and the GAO account of ongoing lander work does not settle which rockets will compete for a bulk launch-services buy.
Why consider buying launches in bulk?
A multi-provider procurement could give NASA more options for matching cargo to available rockets and lunar landers. It could also help the agency plan repeated deliveries rather than arrange each launch in isolation. Those are plausible reasons for the flexibility described in the report, not confirmed terms or a finalized NASA rationale.
The challenge is not simply choosing the rocket with the largest advertised payload. A Moon Base delivery plan has to account for payload size and destination, compatibility with a lander, launch availability and cadence, readiness, and schedule risk. The report describes launch capacity and ramp-up as concerns, but these market assessments are report-attributed rather than NASA award findings.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
How the reported cargo scale differs from NASA’s technical concept
The Bloomberg-attributed account says NASA may need to land as much as 60 metric tons (132,000 pounds) of equipment on the Moon in 2029 for power systems, habitats and other infrastructure. That is a reported estimate of prospective surface deliveries, not a confirmed requirement in a published launch contract.
Rank #2
- Moebius
- Accurate Scale Model
- Assembly Instruction Provided
- Highly Detailed Model Kit
- Detailed Instructions Provided
A separate NASA Technical Reports Server record describes a conceptual mission for a generalized heavy payload exceeding 4,000 kilograms. In that study, the assumed launch vehicle could deliver more than 40,000 kilograms to orbit; the studied configuration avoided on-orbit propellant transfer and multiple launch configurations. Those are assumptions in a mission concept, not specifications for the reported bulk buy.
| Figure | What it refers to | Source and status |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 60 metric tons (132,000 pounds) | Equipment NASA may need to land in 2029 for Moon Base infrastructure | Bloomberg-attributed 2026 reporting quoting Moon Base Program Manager Carlos García-Galán; report-attributed, not a published contract requirement |
| More than 4,000 kilograms | Generalized heavy payload in a lunar delivery mission concept | NASA Technical Reports Server, 2026; conceptual study value |
| More than 40,000 kilograms to orbit | Launch capability assumed in that mission concept | NASA Technical Reports Server, 2026; study assumption, not a bulk-buy specification |
How a launch buy fits into NASA’s Moon Base plans
NASA’s March 2026 Ignition material describes a goal of establishing a permanent lunar outpost by 2030. It also sought industry input on hardware and technologies that could be developed or repurposed for lunar demonstrations within two to four years, along with supply-chain and testing constraints. The named areas included propellant-tank dome manufacturing, high-thrust hypergolic engines, radiation-hardened electronics and hypergolic test stands.
The agency’s plans involve multiple commercial providers and programs, not a single contractor responsible for every part of the effort. NASA selected Astrolab and Lunar Outpost to develop lunar terrain vehicles, placed delivery task orders with Blue Origin, selected Firefly Aerospace to build the spacecraft that will carry its MoonFall drones, and announced later payload missions involving Astrobotic, Firefly Aerospace and Intuitive Machines.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
NASA’s May 2026 update said the first terrain vehicles are intended to support crewed and uncrewed mobility by 2028. It reported first-phase vehicle awards of $219 million to Astrolab and $220 million to Lunar Outpost, and a $188 million award to Blue Origin for delivery task orders with an option period worth $280.4 million. These are terrain-vehicle and delivery awards, not disclosed values for a launch-services bulk buy.
Rank #3
- 【Solar System】: DIY your own sun earth moon orbital rotation model with this creative kit. Seasonal plate that shows the names, order, and dates of the four seasons and the twenty-four solar terms in the traditional Chinese calendar. night, seasons, solar eclipse, lunar eclipse and moon phases .
- 【Usage Scenarios】: Great for Geology & Earth Sciences Teaching, School project also Great gift for your children over 6 years old, it cultivates children's interest in space science. Earth orbiting around the sun, and moon orbiting around the earth showing planetary orbit.
- 【To Demonstrate Seasons and Solar and Lunar Eclipses】: 1)Rotate the Earth to show how the Earth's rotation and orbit around the Sun create seasons; 2)To demonstrate a solar eclipse, move the Moon between the Earth and the Sun, blocking the Sun's light and casting a shadow on the Earth; 3)To demonstrate a lunar eclipse, move the Moon into the Earth's shadow, creating a tint on the Moon.
- 【Easy to Assemble 】: Updated Instruction 1)Wrench the connecting nut to the seasonal plate; 2) Insert the axe to the slot, put the two screws to the corresponding holes, then tighten the screws; 3) Get the “solar system” aligned correctly: Set the handle with the pointer on the summer solstice, adjust the position of the Earth so that the sun shines directly on its Tropic of Cancer; 4)Assemble the gears upper and underneath with the black peg;Put the sun’s metal wire in the hole on the lever.
- 【Size Information】100% brand new and high quality. Size(LxWxH): Approx. 38 x 20 x 28 cm / 15.20 x 7.87 x 11.02 inch.
NASA also describes CLPS 2.0 as a competitive successor to CLPS 1.0 for delivering payloads to the lunar surface and orbit. The agency’s stated plan anticipates a ten-year ordering period and a fifteen-year execution timeline, with the program targeted to be capped at $6 billion. That program target is not a stated price for the reported launcher purchases.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What has changed in the Artemis architecture
The GAO’s 2026 account says NASA no longer planned to use SLS Block 1B and Mobile Launcher 2 as originally planned, and had paused Gateway Initial Capability after changes to Artemis missions and a shift in focus toward a lunar surface base. NASA intended to repurpose applicable Gateway hardware and draw on existing international partner commitments. These changes help explain why procurement flexibility may matter, but they do not confirm a particular bulk purchase or a decision to exclude SpaceX.
The same GAO account notes continuing technical risks in SpaceX’s cryogenic propellant-transfer technology and Starship testing. That is a schedule and technical risk in the human landing system effort; it is not evidence that NASA has ended its work with SpaceX.
What is still unknown
- Which launch vehicles or providers NASA might include in an initial buy.
- Whether Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy or any other named system would be eligible or selected.
- The number of launches, payload assignments, schedule, award value and contract terms.
- Whether NASA will publish the plan as an award, solicitation or another procurement announcement.
NASA’s Moon Base page also describes the harsh lunar South Pole environment: sunlit areas can exceed 130°F (54°C), while permanently shadowed craters can reach -334°F (-203°C). That temperature range helps explain why the cargo list includes substantial infrastructure and why surface-delivery planning involves more than transporting a single crew vehicle.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
