The Jewish Greens say they have no official collective position on the Green Party motion “Zionism is Racism”: members are divided. That is a change from the group’s February 2026 statement opposing the motion. Its later briefings in August and October describe a split rather than a settled view.
What is the motion, and what is known about its status?
The Green Party of England and Wales’s Spring Conference 2026 final agenda lists a motion titled “Zionism is Racism” as E12. The Jewish Greens’ October briefing refers to the motion as E02. Those are the identifiers used by the respective sources; the available material does not explain how they relate.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Yachad said the motion was scheduled for the party’s Brighton conference on 2–4 October 2026. The sources available do not establish the debate or vote outcome. It would therefore be premature to describe the motion as passed, rejected, amended or adopted as current party policy.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
How the Jewish Greens’ position changed
- February 2026: The Jewish Greens collectively opposed the motion, arguing that it went beyond criticism of Israeli government actions and could make Jews feel unwelcome. The statement also warned about party structures acting against people considered Zionists.
- August 2026: After new members joined and discussions exposed a wider range of views than the February position reflected, the group withdrew that collective opposition. Its interim briefing said: “Our members are very divided over this motion, and as a result we do not have an official position on it.”
- 2 October 2026: The group’s survey briefing again described members as divided and reported no conclusive official position.
What the Jewish Greens’ survey briefing reports
The figures below are results reported by the Jewish Greens about its own members; they are not estimates of Jewish people or Green Party members generally. The available briefing extract does not state the respondent count, field dates or sampling method, and it provides only partial questionnaire wording.
#1 Best Overall
- A New York Times and Wall Street Journal Bestseller.
- Finalist for the Financial Times and Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year
- One of the best books of the year, picked by Washington Post, The Economist, Bloomberg
| Survey item or finding | Result reported by Jewish Greens |
|---|---|
| Whether the group should collectively oppose the motion | Average response of 5.1 on a 0–10 scale; the group interpreted this as a split down the middle. |
| Whether passing the motion could make discrimination against Jews in the party more likely | 53% agreed; 47% disagreed. |
| Whether “Zionism is racism” discriminates against Jews | 47% strongly disagreed; 25% strongly agreed. |
| Concern about the motion’s potential effect on the party’s electoral prospects | 68% were concerned. |
| Whether Palestine Action should be de-proscribed | 70% strongly agreed. |
| Whether Palestinians have a right to resist apartheid, occupation and genocide by “all available means within international law” | 64% strongly agreed. |
| Whether UK citizens who fight with the Israeli military should face criminal prosecution | 50% strongly agreed; 17% strongly disagreed. |
| Whether anti-Zionism is antisemitism | 67% strongly disagreed with the assertion. |
The Jewish Greens described members as predominantly non-Zionist and/or anti-Zionist, with a significant minority identifying as Zionist. Its October briefing said members’ leading concerns were not primarily about effects on Jewish members, but about policy and the party as a whole. The results indicate disagreement among the group’s respondents; the missing methodology details limit what can be inferred beyond that.
Why members and organisations disagree
Concern about exclusion and conflating identity with politics
In its August account of the internal debate, the Jewish Greens said some members feared the motion could expose Jews to discrimination because Jews are more likely to identify as Zionists or have connections with institutions such as synagogues. Its February statement similarly argued that the motion could make Jews feel unwelcome.
Rank #2
Yachad opposes the motion. In its 23 September 2026 statement, it described Zionism at its most basic as the belief that Jews have a right to self-determination and argued that calling it racist risks stigmatizing Jewish national aspirations. Yachad said parties can oppose the devastation in Gaza, settlement expansion and settler violence while also defending the rights and security of Israelis and Palestinians. The statement also said: “He showed that it is possible to be unflinching about Palestinian rights without denying Jewish ones.”
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsArgument that the motion targets an ideology, not Jews
Other Jewish Greens reject the claim that the motion targets Jews or Zionists, arguing instead that it addresses Zionism as the motion defines it. Greens for Palestine’s press material likewise presents the opposing argument that the motion uses a narrower definition of Zionism than the range of meanings in Zionist discourse. That is the organisation’s characterization of the motion, not a settled account of what all Zionism means.
Questions the disagreement turns on
The positions differ over how Zionism is defined, whether the motion is understood as criticism of a political ideology or as a risk of conflating Jewish identity with political belief, and what it could mean for party policy and member inclusion. They also reflect competing views about how Palestinian rights relate to Jewish self-determination and Israeli security. These are points of dispute, not conclusions established by the survey.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What readers can conclude
The Jewish Greens’ collective stance is not the February call to oppose the motion: by August and again in its 2 October briefing, the group described division and no official conclusive position. Its survey results show disagreement among respondents but do not establish opinion across the wider Jewish community or the Green Party. The motion’s conference outcome is also not established by the available sources.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Author: George Orwell.
- Publisher: Signet Classic
- Pages: 328
- Publication Date: 1961-01-01
- Edition: Large type / Large print
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →
