Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →On English Wikipedia, editors do not decide inclusion by popularity, fame, or a fixed number of Google results. They ask two separate questions: does a subject merit its own page, and can a particular claim be included in an existing page? A standalone article normally needs significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, while individual passages must be verifiable, neutral, relevant to the article’s scope, and given weight proportionate to the available evidence. Editors then use policy-based discussion to choose between a new page, a merge, a redirect, a list entry, or coverage in a broader article.
First, identify which decision is being made
“Does this belong on Wikipedia?” can mean several different things. Editors distinguish eligibility for a separate article from the much narrower question of whether one fact belongs in a page that already exists. The distinction prevents two common errors: treating a notable subject as permission to publish every detail about it, and assuming that a subject without its own page can never be mentioned anywhere.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
- Standalone eligibility: whether a subject deserves a separate article or list.
- Article-content eligibility: whether a claim is relevant, reliably sourced, neutral, and proportionate inside a particular page.
- Page structure: whether readers will understand the material better as a standalone page, a section in a broader article, a grouped page, a list, or a redirect.
These are related judgments, but they use different tests. Notability is primarily an article-creation test. Verifiability, neutrality, due weight, and scope govern the material that appears after an article exists.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesDoes the subject fit an encyclopedia?
Editors begin with encyclopedic scope. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate directory, advertising platform, personal homepage, newsfeed, or repository for an author’s own theories. A topic can be famous, commercially successful, politically important, or popular online and still be unsuitable for an encyclopedia if the proposed page would amount to promotion, original research, or an unstructured collection of facts.
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
The question is not whether anyone has heard of the subject. It is whether a neutral, sourced account would add durable reference value. A company’s own announcement can establish what the company claims about itself, for example, but it does not independently demonstrate that the company merits an encyclopedia article.
How the notability test works for a standalone page
1. Look for significant coverage
English Wikipedia’s general notability guidance asks whether reliable sources independent of the subject have discussed it significantly. “Significant” means more than a passing mention, directory listing, routine database entry, or brief name-check. The sources should address the topic directly and in enough depth for an editor to write a useful article without adding unpublished interpretation.
There is no universal source-count requirement. One substantial, independent source can be more useful than many shallow mentions, while several modest sources may collectively establish a well-documented subject. Editors assess the quality, independence, depth, and relevance of the sources rather than tallying them.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →2. Prefer independent, generally secondary sources
For a notability presumption, editors usually look for secondary sources such as serious journalism, books from reputable publishers, scholarly work, or analytical reporting. Independence matters because a source controlled by the subject cannot provide the same evidence of outside attention. Press releases, sponsored copy, the subject’s own website, promotional brochures, and self-published statements may be usable for limited factual claims, but they do not normally establish notability.
Reliability is contextual rather than a single permanent ranking. A publication may be strong for reporting a date or quoting an announcement but weak for a technical conclusion outside its expertise. Editors examine the author, publisher, editorial process, subject-matter competence, and the exact claim being supported.
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
3. Test whether the attention is substantial
A short burst of coverage can be misleading. Sustained attention is a stronger indication that a subject has lasting reference significance, although continuous new coverage is not required once the subject has established notability. Editors also consider whether the sources merely repeat the same press material or provide genuinely independent treatment.
4. Check subject-specific guidance without treating it as an automatic pass
Some fields have additional notability guidance describing the kinds of sources or achievements that commonly matter. Meeting such a subject-specific guideline creates a presumption, not an unconditional entitlement to a page. The article still needs suitable sourcing, an encyclopedic purpose, and enough material for a coherent, balanced treatment.
Notability does not decide every fact in an article
A subject can fail to qualify for a standalone page yet deserve a sourced paragraph in a broader article. For example, a short-lived event might be relevant to the history of a movement even if independent sources do not support a complete page about the event itself. Conversely, a notable person, organization, or product is not entitled to every rumor, anecdote, award listing, or database field that can be found online.
For each proposed passage, editors ask whether the information is directly supported by a reliable published source, relevant to the page’s scope, written in a neutral manner, and important enough to receive the space it would take. A source can establish that a statement is true without making that statement important enough for inclusion.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
Choosing a standalone page or broader coverage
When more than one structure could work, editors compare the options against reader understanding and article balance rather than personal preference.
| Question | Standalone page | Coverage in a broader page |
|---|---|---|
| Sourcing depth | Enough significant, independent material for a useful article with more than a definition. | Sources may support a focused section but not a complete, balanced page. |
| Reader context | The subject has a coherent history, scope, or identity readers can follow on its own. | The subject makes more sense as part of a larger topic. |
| Relationships | Separate treatment clarifies the subject without duplicating another page. | Grouping related subjects gives necessary context or prevents fragmented stubs. |
| Neutral weight | The page can represent significant viewpoints without exaggerating a minor topic. | A section can give proportionate space while keeping the larger article balanced. |
| Claim-level support | Material claims can be cited throughout a full article. | Only the well-supported, relevant claims need to be included in the parent page. |
A merge is therefore not necessarily a judgment that a subject is unimportant. It can be an editorial choice that readers will understand the subject better in context.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallHow editors decide what wording and claims to include
Verifiability
Material claims must be checkable against reliable, published sources. Inline citations are especially important for quotations, disputed statements, statistics, claims likely to be challenged, and information whose accuracy is not obvious. Editors should cite the source close to the claim it supports, not attach one citation to a paragraph containing several unrelated assertions.
Neutral point of view
Neutrality means describing significant views found in reliable sources fairly and in proportion to their prominence. It does not require giving equal space to every assertion. A fringe claim that receives little serious coverage should not occupy half an article simply because someone has made it; a well-documented controversy should not be erased merely because it is uncomfortable.
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
“All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.”
Neutral writing also avoids Wikipedia’s voice endorsing an argument. Instead of asserting that a disputed policy “is a failure,” an article can attribute the assessment to named publications or describe the measurable effects that sources report.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Due weight and article balance
Due weight connects sourcing to structure. A claim may be true and cited yet still receive too much emphasis compared with the subject’s overall coverage. Editors consider how much attention reliable sources give each aspect, whether the information is central or incidental, and how much space is appropriate in the article’s context.
No original research
Editors may summarize and combine what sources say, but they may not create a new conclusion by connecting facts that no source connects. Calculations, classifications, causal explanations, and interpretations need published support when they go beyond straightforward description. An editor’s expertise does not substitute for a source.
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
What happens when editors disagree?
Wikipedia uses consensus, not a simple vote. Editors explain their positions, identify the relevant policy, and point to the sources that support or undermine a proposal. Consensus weighs the quality of arguments and the strength of objections; counting usernames or comments does not settle the issue.
- Start on the article’s talk page. Describe the proposed addition, removal, merge, or structural change and provide the relevant sources.
- Discuss policy and evidence. Explain how the change affects verifiability, neutrality, due weight, scope, or the usefulness of the page.
- Revise where possible. Narrow an overbroad claim, add a missing citation, attribute a viewpoint, or propose a better structure.
- Seek wider input if discussion stalls. Requests for comment, noticeboards, and other dispute-resolution processes can bring in uninvolved editors.
- Apply the resulting consensus. Consensus cannot authorize content that conflicts with core policies such as neutrality, verifiability, or the prohibition on original research.
Editors should argue from sources and policy rather than from ownership, seniority, or the number of supporters on one side.
Why a page might be merged, redirected, listed, or deleted
If a proposed subject does not work as an independent article, editors have several alternatives. They may merge the sourced material into a parent page, redirect the title to that page, group related subjects together, or place the information in a suitable list. The choice depends on the amount and quality of sourcing, the relationship between topics, and what structure best serves readers.
Deletion is one possible outcome, not an automatic consequence of a weak draft. Poor prose, missing citations, or an incomplete search for sources can often be fixed. Editors may improve the page, add maintenance tags, or look for independent sources before concluding that no suitable article is possible. A deletion discussion is a review of the article’s policy fit and available evidence, not a referendum on whether the subject has value outside Wikipedia.
A practical checklist for proposing an article or edit
- Define the subject precisely and explain why it belongs in an encyclopedia.
- Find independent, reliable, generally secondary sources that discuss it in depth.
- Separate sources that establish outside coverage from sources that merely report the subject’s own claims.
- Draft only what the sources actually support; do not infer a conclusion they do not state.
- Decide whether a standalone page, a section, a grouped article, a list entry, or a redirect gives readers the clearest context.
- Give major viewpoints space in proportion to their treatment in reliable sources.
- Add inline citations for challenged, quoted, technical, numerical, or non-obvious claims.
- Use the talk page to explain the policy and evidence behind a disputed change.
The short answer to common misconceptions
Fame alone is not a guarantee of a page. A fixed number of sources is not required. A subject can be mentioned without qualifying for its own article. A notable subject can still have unsourced or irrelevant details removed. And consensus means policy-based evaluation of arguments, not a headcount.
These principles describe English Wikipedia. Other language editions have their own communities, policies, and guidelines, so their inclusion decisions may differ. The Wikimedia Foundation provides the platform and does not act as the editorial authority deciding which topics or claims belong in articles.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
