The 2019 method by Mahesh Vishe and Jeffrey N. Johnston uses two polarity reversals to make a stereodefined β2,3-amino amide. First, an enantioselective addition of a nitroalkane to a β-substituted nitroalkene makes the key carbon–carbon bond and sets the carbon framework. The resulting intermediate then undergoes Umpolung Amide Synthesis (UmAS), which forms the amide without first converting the material into a carboxylic acid or an activated acid derivative. A molybdenum oxide-mediated hydride reduction is reported to furnish the anti-β2,3-amino amide with high selectivity.
This is a specific synthetic strategy reported in Chemical Science, not a claim that every β-amino amide is best made this way. The paper appeared in 2019 (volume 10, pages 1138–1143; DOI 10.1039/C8SC04330B) and was first published online on 12 November 2018.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Organic Chemistry | $125.24 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Organic Chemistry (MasteringChemistry) | $319.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Organic Chemistry as a Second Language: First Semester Topics | $76.48 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Organic Chemistry | $65.32 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Organic Chemistry I For Dummies (For Dummies (Math & Science)) | $11.48 | Buy on Amazon |
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
What the double umpolung approach makes
Umpolung means deliberately reversing the normal polarity of a functional group or reaction partner. In a conventional disconnection, chemists often treat an acyl component as an electrophile: an activated carboxylic acid derivative reacts with an amine to give an amide. Vishe and Johnston designed a route that avoids that familiar acyl-electrophile sequence.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Their strategy is called “double umpolung” because polarity is inverted in two key bond-forming events. The carbon–carbon bond is made through nitroalkane–nitroalkene chemistry rather than by the usual polarity pattern associated with constructing an acyl fragment. The carbon–nitrogen bond of the amide is then made by UmAS, so the amide appears without an intervening carboxylic acid or activated acid derivative.
#1 Best Overall
The result is a stereocontrolled route to a β2,3-amino amide. The abstract of the article states: “A stereocontrolled synthesis of β2,3-amino amides is reported.” The method is important as a design concept: it combines a stereodefined carbon framework with a nontraditional amide-forming operation instead of treating the amide as the first functional group to install.
What β2,3-amino amide means in this paper
A β-amino amide contains an amino substituent at the beta position relative to the amide carbonyl. The β2,3 designation identifies the paper’s substituted, stereochemically defined framework and the two carbon positions whose configuration and substitution are tracked in the products. The exact atom numbering is best read from each reaction scheme because different substrate drawings can make the same connectivity look different.
“Anti” describes the relative stereochemical relationship in the product: the relevant substituents are arranged on opposite faces of the framework in the convention used for the paper. It does not, by itself, specify an absolute R or S assignment. Absolute configuration depends on the substrate and the enantioselective conditions used for that example.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
These motifs matter because β-amino amides occur in complex natural products and therapeutic molecules. Their value is not only the presence of an amide and an amine, but also the three-dimensional arrangement of those groups. A route that forms the carbon skeleton and controls relative and enantiomeric stereochemistry can reduce the need for late-stage separation or corrective transformations.
Rank #2
How the sequence works
1. Start with a β-substituted nitroalkene
The electrophilic partner is a nitroalkene bearing substitution at the beta position. The nitro group strongly influences the alkene’s reactivity and provides a handle that can be carried through the sequence. The paper’s design uses this activated alkene to accept a carbon nucleophile while preserving the substitution pattern needed for the β2,3-amino amide.
The 2019 article does not establish one universal set of substrate structures or a complete substrate-by-substrate scope table. Consequently, the method should be understood as a demonstrated reaction platform rather than a guarantee for an arbitrary nitroalkene.
2. Add a nitroalkane enantioselectively
A nitroalkane is combined with the β-substituted nitroalkene under the authors’ enantioselective conditions. In polarity terms, the nitroalkane supplies the carbon nucleophile and the nitroalkene supplies the electrophilic alkene. This creates the key C–C bond while introducing the stereochemical information that will be expressed in the final amino amide.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
This is the first umpolung element. The carbon fragment that ultimately belongs to the amino-amide framework is introduced through nitroalkane addition, rather than through a conventional acyl-component disconnection. The addition establishes the carbon backbone before the amide is formed.
3. Convert the adduct by UmAS
The nitroalkane–nitroalkene adduct is taken into the Umpolung Amide Synthesis portion of the sequence. UmAS is the second polarity reversal: the amide is delivered from the functional-group arrangement created in the nitro chemistry, without isolating a carboxylic acid or an activated acid derivative as the amide precursor.
That distinction is operationally significant. Standard peptide-style couplings commonly require preparation, activation, storage or in situ generation of an acid derivative. The Vishe–Johnston design changes the order of operations: make the carbon skeleton first, then use UmAS to create the amide directly from the non-acid intermediate.
4. Use molybdenum oxide-mediated hydride reduction
The reported sequence includes a molybdenum oxide-mediated hydride reduction. The authors associate this operation with formation of the anti-β2,3-amino amide and describe the stereochemical outcome as highly selective. The 2019 article does not provide a verified numerical selectivity value, so “high selectivity” should not be converted into a percentage.
The reduction step is best viewed as part of the integrated stereochemical design rather than as an unrelated cleanup operation. It converts the precursor into the amino-amide oxidation state while preserving or delivering the relative configuration required for the anti product. Exact mechanistic assignments and substrate-dependent outcomes should be taken from the article’s schemes and supporting information for a particular example.
Rank #4
Why avoiding an acid intermediate matters
Removing the carboxylic-acid or activated-acid stage changes the route’s functional-group choreography. It can avoid a separate oxidation to an acid, protection or deprotection decisions associated with acid handling, and activation chemistry before amine coupling. More importantly, the amide-forming event is built into the polarity-reversed sequence rather than appended as a conventional final coupling.
This does not mean that UmAS is automatically simpler for every target. Nitroalkene preparation, enantioselective addition, reduction control and the compatibility of each substrate with the sequence all become central considerations. The advantage is strategic: the route aligns C–C construction, stereochemical control and amide formation in one plan.
Reported standard conditions
The article’s scheme caption gives the following standard conditions. They are the authors’ reported reaction conditions, not an independent replication or a scale-up recommendation.
Recommended Free Tools
| Parameter | Reported value | How to interpret it |
|---|---|---|
| Reaction scale | 0.1 mmol | Small-scale demonstration used for the standard reactions. |
| Concentration | 0.1 M | The reaction mixture was run at this stated concentration. |
| Amine loading | 2 equivalents | The stated standard amount of amine relative to the limiting substrate. |
| Time | 24 hours | The reported reaction duration for standard examples. |
| Temperature | 25 °C | Room-temperature condition as reported in the scheme caption. |
| Enantiomeric-ratio analysis | Chiral HPLC | Ratios were measured by HPLC using a chiral stationary phase. |
These values should not be generalized to every substrate. A change in nitroalkene substitution, nitroalkane structure, amine, solvent, concentration or catalyst loading can alter conversion and stereochemical outcome. Anyone reproducing the method should use the paper and its supporting information for the exact example rather than treating the caption as a complete experimental recipe.
Best Value
What the method establishes—and what it does not
Supported conclusions
- The paper reports a stereocontrolled synthesis of β2,3-amino amides.
- An enantioselective nitroalkane–nitroalkene addition establishes the key carbon framework.
- UmAS forms the amide without an intervening carboxylic acid or activated acid derivative.
- A molybdenum oxide-mediated hydride reduction is reported to deliver the anti product with high selectivity.
- The standard reactions were described at 0.1 mmol, 0.1 M, with 2 equivalents of amine, for 24 hours at 25 °C.
Claims that require checking in the full paper
- Exact isolated yields for individual substrates.
- Exact enantiomeric ratios for each example.
- The complete substrate scope and the limits of substitution tolerated by the nitroalkene, nitroalkane and amine components.
- Whether a particular functional group survives the reduction and UmAS operations.
- Scale-up behavior, mixing sensitivity and preparative work-up details.
The 2019 publication does not provide a complete, independently verified yield and enantiomeric-ratio table. That is a limitation on the numerical detail that can responsibly be quoted here, not evidence that the original article lacks such data.
How to evaluate this route against alternatives
A fair comparison should focus on the chemistry of the target rather than on a single headline yield. The most informative questions are:
- Bond disconnection: Is the target better served by nitroalkane addition, a conventional amide coupling, or another C–C-forming reaction?
- Polarity: Which partner is nucleophilic and which is electrophilic at each bond-forming step?
- Stereochemical control: Is the desired relative anti relationship set during carbon–carbon bond formation, during reduction, or by resolution afterward?
- Functional-group economy: Does the route require an acid, activated acid, protecting group or oxidation-state adjustment that the double-umpolung route avoids?
- Operational demands: Are the small-scale conditions compatible with the substrate’s solubility, stability and available analytical methods?
- Scope evidence: Has the exact substrate class been demonstrated, or is compatibility being inferred from a neighboring example?
The 2019 article supports the first route as a credible proof of concept for stereocontrolled β2,3-amino-amide synthesis. It does not support declaring it universally superior to all other methods.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Practical reading of the 2019 result
The central lesson is synthetic planning. Instead of treating the amide as a late-stage product of acid activation and amine coupling, the authors use a nitro-based polarity pattern to build the carbon skeleton and then invoke UmAS for direct amide formation. The two inversions are coordinated: the first controls how the carbon atoms are joined, while the second changes how the nitrogen-containing amide is installed.
For a chemist deciding whether to adapt the method, the first screen should be structural. Identify whether the desired β2,3-amino amide can be mapped onto a β-substituted nitroalkene and a suitable nitroalkane. Next, determine whether the required enantioselective addition has precedent for the specific substitution pattern. Finally, check the exact UmAS and molybdenum oxide-mediated reduction procedure for that substrate class, including analytical methods for relative and enantiomeric stereochemistry.
For readers learning reaction design, the method is an example of why “umpolung” is more than a named reaction. It is a planning principle: reverse the normal polarity at a strategically chosen stage so that a difficult bond can be made from different, and sometimes more controllable, partners.
Publication details
Mahesh Vishe and Jeffrey N. Johnston reported the method in “The inverted ketene synthon: a double umpolung approach to enantioselective β2,3-amino amide synthesis,” Chemical Science, 2019, volume 10, pages 1138–1143, DOI 10.1039/C8SC04330B. The article is marked open access by the Royal Society of Chemistry. A 2018 Chemistry World report placed the work in the broader context of β-amino amide motifs found in complex natural products and therapeutic molecules, while emphasizing the challenge of obtaining selected configurations.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
