The U.S. Army has established three permanent counter-drone test lanes at Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona: one for detecting drones, one for electronic defeat such as jamming, and one for physically destroying them. The lanes were used in Falcon Peak 26.2, a September 2026 experiment that tested systems in desert scenarios modeled on drone incursions at the U.S. southern border.
What the three test lanes evaluate
The lanes divide counter-uncrewed aircraft system (counter-UAS) testing into three stages: finding a drone, disrupting it electronically, and physically intercepting it. The Army intends the facilities to support continuing tests involving the Department of War, military units, industry and defense partners.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
LIBEIMD for SKYDROID TR01 2.4G/5.8G Dual Band 20KM - Modules for Anti-Interference for Drone & RC... | $756.23 | Buy on Amazon |
| Lane | Purpose | Useful comparison measures |
|---|---|---|
| Detection | Find and track small drones using sensors such as radars and cameras. | Detection range and track quality. |
| Electronic defeat | Disrupt drone links or take control of drones without a physical intercept. | Resistance to countermeasures, selectivity, and recovery behavior. |
| Kinetic defeat | Use weapons to physically shoot drones down. | Hit probability, engagement speed, and controls for collateral risk. |
These are useful dimensions for comparing systems, not published scores from Falcon Peak 26.2. The public account did not provide statistical performance results for the lanes.
What Falcon Peak 26.2 tested at Yuma
Joint Interagency Task Force 401 conducted Falcon Peak 26.2 in September 2026 in support of U.S. Northern Command and Joint Task Force Southern Border. The event modeled drone incursions in southern-border desert conditions; it was the first Falcon Peak event to use that setting.
#1 Best Overall
- Good texture and have long service life.
- To ensure the practicality and durability.
- Small and exquisite appearance, with beautiful design.
- Great Solid and durable, long service life.
- Easy to install and reliable to use
Testing the systems in a common scenario can reveal how they work beyond an individual vendor demonstration. In particular, counter-drone operations depend on sensors, command-and-control software, and effectors—systems that jam or physically engage a target—working together.
How Anduril Lattice fit into the test
Falcon Peak 26.2 was the first Yuma test event to use Anduril’s Lattice autonomous command-and-control software as the baseline for commercial sensor-to-shooter evaluation. Radars, cameras and weapons were assessed on how well they connected to the common system, which tracks drones and assigns them to an appropriate weapon.
Yuma Proving Ground capability integrator David Bates described the event as Lattice’s first deployment there for test and evaluation, and said it produced lessons about testing and evaluation. Using one software baseline gives evaluators a shared integration point; it does not, by itself, establish that every system performed equally well or that any particular system prevailed.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What is publicly known about participating systems
Public reporting does not identify every participating company or publish comparative results. It names Allen Control Systems’ Bullfrog robotic gun turret as one example: the system was photographed firing at drone targets on September 9. That is evidence of its presence in the event, not evidence that it won or represented the full set of systems tested.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →The Army’s wider counter-UAS work also includes portable systems intended to detect, jam or destroy potential enemy aircraft. Those capabilities provide context for the Yuma lanes, but they do not establish that every portable system was part of Falcon Peak 26.2.
Why permanent lanes matter
Permanent facilities can give future evaluations a repeatable place to test detection, electronic warfare and kinetic interception under realistic scenarios. The Army’s stated effort to standardize each lane’s specifications and measurement aims to give different systems a common baseline rather than letting each be judged only under its own demonstration conditions.
Task force test integrator Hi-Sing Silen described that aim: “The range is standardizing the spec sheet for each of these three lanes. The goal is to have set standards of measurement so we all have a baseline to start with.” Whether that produces directly comparable results will depend on the specific standards and test conditions used; public reporting has not yet supplied those details or a vendor-by-vendor scorecard.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
