FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Midnight Commander vs muCommander

Both stand on file manager software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Midnight Commander

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted

Midnight Commander combines file management and built-in viewing and editing tools in a text interface, with remote access options. Its read-only tar access and conditional SFTP support are worth considering alongside its volunteer support model.

Visit Midnight Commander

muCommander

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

muCommander combines file operations, network access, and archive handling in a free desktop file manager. Check its Java requirement and supported services against your setup before choosing it.

Visit muCommander

The facts

Midnight CommandermuCommander
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, Self-hostedLinux, Mac, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitemidnight-commander.orgmucommander.com
On file manager software#6 of 100#10 of 100

Midnight Commander: what it does well

  • Dual-pane interface for file management
  • Includes an internal viewer, editor, and diff viewer
  • Supports FTP and shell connections
  • Read-only access to tar archives
  • Free under the GNU General Public License

What to know first

  • SFTP requires compilation with sftpfs
  • Tar archive access is read-only
  • No commercial-grade support, service-level agreements, or warranties

muCommander: what it does well

  • Free and open source under GNU GPL v3
  • Dual-pane browsing and multiple tabs
  • Batch renaming and file emailing
  • Supports Dropbox and Google Drive
  • Portable version available

What to know first

  • Requires Java 11 or later
  • Cloud services listed are Dropbox and Google Drive
  • Additional packages depend on Java-supporting systems

Alternatives to Midnight Commander Alternatives to muCommander The whole list