Side by side
JORAM vs NanoMQ
Both stand on message broker software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
JORAM offers multiple deployment and administration choices alongside clustered messaging and high-availability options. Its Java 11 minimum is a key compatibility constraint for older environments.
Visit JORAM
Free plan LinuxSelf-hostedWindows
NanoMQ provides a broad, self-hosted protocol and integration set for edge messaging without a listed charge. Platform-specific limitations, including Windows QUIC support and Linux gateway availability, should be checked against deployment needs.
Visit NanoMQThe facts
| JORAM | NanoMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Windows | Linux, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | joram.ow2.io | nanomq.io |
| On message broker software | #19 of 39 | #23 of 39 |
JORAM: what it does well
- Supports JMS 1.1, JMS 2.0, and Jakarta/JMS 3.0.
- Runs standalone, embedded, or through a JCA adapter.
- Provides clustered destinations and replicated-data high availability.
- Administration includes JMX, REST, and a web console.
- Free software under LGPL 2.1 or later.
What to know first
- Since version 5.22.0, Java versions earlier than 11 are unsupported.
- Java compatibility is listed only through version 21.
NanoMQ: what it does well
- Supports MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1, and 3.1
- Bridges edge messages to multiple clouds
- Built-in persistence resumes uploads
- Includes SQL-based rule engine
- Free open-source editions
What to know first
- Windows documentation marks QUIC unsupported
- Linux table marks several gateways unavailable
- HTTP API lists default admin/public credentials
- Self-hosted deployment requires installation