FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Honeyd vs OpenCanary

Both stand on honeypot software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Honeyd

Free plan LinuxSelf-hostedWindows

Honeyd offers extensive virtual-host and network simulation capabilities for self-hosted honeypot setups. Traffic routing requires separate configuration, and the latest listed release is dated 2007.

Visit Honeyd

OpenCanary

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted

OpenCanary offers a range of decoy services and alert routes for self-hosted network monitoring. Review platform and module limits, and secure its root-read configuration file.

Visit OpenCanary

The facts

HoneydOpenCanary
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Self-hosted, WindowsLinux, Mac, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comgithub.com
On honeypot software#6 of 21#10 of 21

Honeyd: what it does well

  • Simulates thousands of virtual hosts at once
  • Supports configurable virtual routing topologies
  • Flow logs include connection details and OS comments
  • Free and GPL-licensed

What to know first

  • Traffic must be directed to Honeyd manually
  • Maker recommends sandboxing because it interacts with malicious traffic
  • Latest listed release dates to 2007

OpenCanary: what it does well

  • Imitates a broad range of network services.
  • Supports email, Syslog, webhooks and chat alerts.
  • Correlator groups related events into one alert.
  • Can run on a Raspberry Pi.
  • Free plan: free.

What to know first

  • SMB monitoring is unavailable on macOS.
  • Portscan monitoring is Linux-only.
  • Portscan monitoring is disabled in Docker.
  • Configuration must be writable only by root.

Alternatives to Honeyd Alternatives to OpenCanary The whole list