FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Headlamp vs KubeSphere

Both stand on container management software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Headlamp

Free plan Open source APIExtensionLinux+4

Headlamp offers a no-charge graphical interface with multi-cluster management and plugin extensibility. Users should account for its plugin security guidance and browser token handling when selecting an installation approach.

Visit Headlamp

KubeSphere

Free plan Open source APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

KubeSphere pairs a free self-managed Community Edition with an Enterprise offering that adds security, permissions, and support options. Teams should compare the editions and contact sales for Enterprise pricing.

Visit KubeSphere

The facts

HeadlampKubeSphere
Free planYesYes
Open sourceYesYes
Runs onAPI, Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, WindowsAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planFree or on requestKubeSphere Backup Basic: $65 a month
Plans published27
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteheadlamp.devkubesphere.io
On container management software#1 of 28#2 of 28

Headlamp: what it does well

  • Available as web and desktop applications
  • Supports monitoring and switching between clusters
  • Controls adapt to Kubernetes RBAC permissions
  • Free under Apache 2.0
  • Desktop app tested on Windows, macOS, and Linux

What to know first

  • Plugins run in the main application’s JavaScript context
  • Browser local storage may retain a user token

KubeSphere: what it does well

  • Community Edition is free forever and self-managed
  • Supports multi-tenancy and multi-cluster management
  • Includes Jenkins-based CI/CD workflows
  • Supports online or offline installation

What to know first

  • Enterprise pricing requires contacting sales
  • Enterprise extensions are available by subscription
  • Community Edition is self-managed

Alternatives to Headlamp Alternatives to KubeSphere The whole list