Side by side
hack.chat vs TapHTML
Both stand on live chat software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb
hack.chat keeps chat simple with accountless channels, disappearing messages, and an open-source self-hosting option. Running your own instance requires the listed Node.js and npm versions plus a reverse proxy for SSL.
Visit hack.chat Free plan ExtensionSelf-hostedWeb
TapHTML combines a free website chat widget with team management, multi-channel alerts, Gmail replies, and browser tools. Its public code and self-hosting option may matter to teams with infrastructure requirements.
Visit TapHTMLThe facts
| hack.chat | TapHTML | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted, Web | Extension, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | hack.chat | taphtml.com |
| On live chat software | #39 of 94 | #43 of 94 |
hack.chat: what it does well
- Free MIT-licensed software
- Accountless, disappearing chats
- Web, API, and self-hosted options
- LaTeX and code highlighting
- Extensible server with hot-reload
What to know first
- No native TLS support
- Self-hosting requires Node.js and npm
- Messages are not retained
TapHTML: what it does well
- Free widget plan at no cost
- Alerts through Slack, Discord, Telegram, and web push
- Gmail replies also appear in chat
- Chrome and Firefox sidebar extensions
- MIT-licensed code can be self-hosted
What to know first
- No visitor tracking or tracking cookies
- Chat histories and media stored on its VPS
Alternatives to hack.chat Alternatives to TapHTML The whole list