FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

gojq vs gron

Both stand on json tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

gojq

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1

gojq brings jq-style querying to Go with CLI and library use, plus YAML support. Check its documented compatibility and execution limits when replacing jq or embedding it in an application.

Visit gojq

gron

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

gron offers a focused way to inspect JSON structure and locate values, with reverse conversion and diffing workflows also documented. Its command-line format and certificate-bypass option are worth considering before use.

Visit gron

The facts

gojqgron
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, Self-hosted, WindowsLinux, Mac, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedgron
Websitegithub.comgithub.com
On json tools#3 of 29#7 of 29

gojq: what it does well

  • Runs jq-style queries against JSON input.
  • Supports YAML input and output.
  • Offers arbitrary-precision integer calculations.
  • Can be embedded as a Go library.

What to know first

  • Does not preserve object key order.
  • Does not parse jq's NaN or Infinity extensions.
  • Some regular-expression syntax differs from jq.
  • Library queries may run indefinitely or produce no output.

gron: what it does well

  • Searches JSON values alongside their paths.
  • Accepts files, URLs, and standard input.
  • Can convert assignments back into JSON.
  • Has no runtime dependencies.
  • MIT licensed and free.

What to know first

  • Command-line tool; no graphical interface is listed.
  • Insecure mode disables certificate validation when fetching URLs.
  • Listed platforms omit FreeBSD, despite its binary downloads being noted.

Alternatives to gojq Alternatives to gron The whole list