FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Flowtake vs Screen Record

Both stand on screen recording software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Flowtake

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

Flowtake offers broad recording and timeline-editing tools without a paid app tier or export paywall. Users must install FFmpeg separately, and macOS and Linux are preview platforms.

Visit Flowtake

Screen Record

Free plan LinuxMacWeb+1

Screen Record offers free browser and desktop capture with webcam and audio options, subject to browser support. Consider its memory limits, lack of editing, and mobile-screen restriction before choosing it.

Visit Screen Record

The facts

FlowtakeScreen Record
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, WindowsLinux, Mac, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comscreen-record.app
On screen recording software#27 of 132#23 of 132

Flowtake: what it does well

  • Free with no export paywall
  • Records screen, camera, microphone, and audio
  • Timeline editing with effects and subtitles
  • Local H.264/MP4 and VP9/WebM export
  • Windows, macOS, and Linux support

What to know first

  • FFmpeg installation required separately
  • Linux capture requires X11 or XWayland
  • Windows artifacts are not Authenticode-signed
  • macOS artifacts are not notarized

Screen Record: what it does well

  • Free plan with no signup or watermark.
  • Records up to 1440p at 60 fps.
  • Can pause and resume recordings.
  • Browser capture works offline after the page loads.
  • No imposed recording-time or export limit.

What to know first

  • Recording length depends on available memory and disk.
  • Safari and Firefox cannot capture system audio.
  • Web recorder cannot capture iOS or Android screens.
  • Video editing is not included.

Alternatives to Flowtake Alternatives to Screen Record The whole list